Plagiorhynchus (Plagiorhynchus) crassicollis Luhe 1911

Plagiorhynchus ( Plagiorhynchus ) crassicollis (Villot, 1875) Lühe, 1911 Syn. Plagiorhynchus lanceolatus (von Linstow, 1876) Lühe, 1911 Material studied. BMNH 1928.2.17.91, from small intestine of Charadrius hiaticula L., Great Britain (detailed locality data not known), whole-mount of 2 specimens (...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Dimitrova, Zlatka
Format: Text
Language:unknown
Published: Zenodo 2009
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3792492
https://zenodo.org/record/3792492
id ftdatacite:10.5281/zenodo.3792492
record_format openpolar
institution Open Polar
collection DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology)
op_collection_id ftdatacite
language unknown
topic Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Acanthocephala
Palaeacanthocephala
Polymorphida
Plagiorhynchidae
Plagiorhynchus
Plagiorhynchus crassicollis
spellingShingle Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Acanthocephala
Palaeacanthocephala
Polymorphida
Plagiorhynchidae
Plagiorhynchus
Plagiorhynchus crassicollis
Dimitrova, Zlatka
Plagiorhynchus (Plagiorhynchus) crassicollis Luhe 1911
topic_facet Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Acanthocephala
Palaeacanthocephala
Polymorphida
Plagiorhynchidae
Plagiorhynchus
Plagiorhynchus crassicollis
description Plagiorhynchus ( Plagiorhynchus ) crassicollis (Villot, 1875) Lühe, 1911 Syn. Plagiorhynchus lanceolatus (von Linstow, 1876) Lühe, 1911 Material studied. BMNH 1928.2.17.91, from small intestine of Charadrius hiaticula L., Great Britain (detailed locality data not known), whole-mount of 2 specimens (1 slide) (material listed by Baylis, 1928); BMNH 1936.8.17.124-140, from small intestine of C . hiaticula , Weymouth, Dorset, England, wet material (material listed by Baylis 1939). Description (Fig. 1) Based on 10 male and 12 female specimens from Charadrius dubius , Weymouth, Dorset, England (BMNH 1936.8.17.124-140). General. Trunk elliptical, almost ovoid, narrowing posteriorly. Transverse vessels of lacunar system form dense reticulum of large polygons. Proboscis cylindrical, situated at angle to axis of trunk. Proboscis armament consists of 19-20 longitudinal rows of 13-14 (12) hooks; first 8 (9) hooks longest, next 2 smaller and last 3 hooks smallest; all hooks with posteriorly directed roots. Neck short (partly or completely withdrawn in some specimens), trapezoidal. Proboscis receptacle doublewalled. Lemnisci band-shaped (bifurcate in single specimen), longer than proboscis receptacle. Male. Trunk 2.4-5.2 long, 1.0-1.64 wide. Proboscis (completely everted in only 2 specimens) 0.56-0.62 long, 0.16 wide. Length of first 8 hooks – blade 32-42 µm, root 32-44 µm; length of next 2 hooks – blade 29 µm, root 25-32 µm; length of last 3 hooks – 25-27 (29) µm, root 13-22 µm. Neck (in 2 specimens) c .0.1 long. Proboscis receptacle 0.70-0.95 long and 0.16-0.25 wide. Lemnisci 1.0-2.6 long, 0.09-0.15 wide. Testes oval to spherical, 0.30-0.80 long, 0.23-0.41 wide, situated in tandem and slightly overlapping one another, in middle region of trunk. Cement glands 6 in number, of different lengths, 0.30-0.95 long, situated immediately posterior to hind testis. Duct of cement glands 0.35-0.65 long. Genital bursa (everted in single specimen) 0.25 long, 0.30 wide. Female. Trunk 2.64-7.0 long, 1.21-2.9 wide. Proboscis (completely everted in only 2 specimens) 0.66-0.7 long, 0.17-0.19 wide. Length of first 8 (9) hooks – blade 37-44 (49) µm, root 34-54 µm; length of next 2 hooks – blade 34-39 µm, root 27-39 µm; length of last 3 hooks blade – 17-29 µm, root 15-27 µm. Neck 0.15-0.17 long. Proboscis receptacle 0.72-1.1 long, 0.24-0.27 wide. Lemnisci 1.0-1.9 long, 0.1-0.13 wide. Female genital tract c .1.2-1.45 long. Vagina provided with 2 sphincters. Genital pore slightly subterminal, at 0.06-0.12 from posterior end of trunk. Fully-developed eggs were observed in 4 specimens (5.1-7.0 long). Eggs elongate-oval, shuttle-shaped, with polar prolongations, 91-134 (135) × 25-42 µm. Additional data. (based on 2 male specimens from C. hiaticula , BMNH 1928.2.17.91). Trunk 4.0- 4.7 in length, 1.4-1.55 wide. Proboscis 0.48-0.5 long. Proboscis armament consists of 20 longitudinal rows of 11-12 hooks in each row. Measurements and morphology of hooks are similar to material from Dorset. Neck very short (40-63 µm long). Testes spherical, 0.60-0.65 long, 0.75-0.87 wide. Cement glands 0.55-1.0 long. Remarks. There are only a few descriptions of this species (Lühe 1911; Petrochenko 1958; Belopol’skaya 1983; del Valle and Coy Otero 1990). Only female specimens were described by Petrochenko (1958) from Phalaropus lobatus (L.) [= P. hyperboreus (L.)] in Kazakhstan. Compared to previous descriptions of the same species (Lühe 1911; Belopol’skaya 1983), the specimens from Kazakhstan differ in the shape and the length of the trunk (elongate-cylindrical and 17 mm long versus oval and c . 7 mm long), the shape of the proboscis (oval versus cylindrical) and the number of longitudinal rows of hooks (16 longitudinal rows of hooks versus 18-20). In addition, there are differences in the dimensions of the eggs: 84 × 16 µm (Petrochenko 1958) versus 110 × 49 µm (Lühe 1911). Consequently, it seems likely that the specimens from Kazakhstan described by Petrochenko (1958) belong to another species. Del Valle and Coy Otero (1990) reported P . crassicollis from Charadrius wilsonia wilsonia Ord in Cuba. According to their description, the armature of the proboscis consists of 18 longitudinal rows of 10-11 hooks per row. However, judging by the drawing of the proboscis (figure 1c in del Valle and Coy Otero 1990), the number of hooks per row is at least 18. Comparing the morphometric data of the present specimens with the descriptions of Lühe (1911) and Belopol’skaya (1983), there are several differences. The maximum number of hooks per longitudinal row in the specimens studied is greater, i.e. 11-14 versus 11-12 (Lühe 1911) or 13 (Belopol’skaya 1983). The male specimens among our material (see ‘Additional data’ above) are in close accordance with the description of Lühe (1911); however, they have a smaller proboscis, i.e. 0.48-0.50 versus 0.60 mm. A difference in the females relates to the size of eggs, which are larger in our specimens, i.e. 91-134 × 25-42 µm compared to 110 × 49 µm (Lühe 1911) and 88-102 × 27-34 µm (del Valle and Coy Otero 1990). One immature female from the same host specimen (Dorset material) possesses a longer proboscis (0.76 mm) and a greater number of hooks per row (15-16). According to these characters, we consider it as belonging to Plagiorhynchus odhneri Lundström, 1942 (see ‘Additional data’ for P. odhneri ). P . ( P .) crassicollis was previously reported from Charadrius hiaticula (= Aegialitis hiaticula ) in the United Kingdom (Baylis 1928, 1939), once apparently in a mixed infection with P . odhneri (see below). It is mainly a parasite of charadriiform birds throughout the western Palaearctic [(Germany, France, Sweden, Switzerland, Ukraine, Russia (the White and Baltic Sea coasts)] (Lühe 1911; Belopol’skaya 1983; Hansson 1997; Reimer 2002; Gibson 2004). There are also occasional records from the Nearctic [Greenland (Hansson 1997)] and Neotropical [Cuba (del Valle and Coy Otero 1990)] Regions. : Published as part of Dimitrova, Zlatka, 2009, Acanthocephalans of the nominotypical subgenus of Plagiorhynchus (Plagiorhynchidae) from charadriiform birds in the collection of the Natural History Museum, London, with a key to the species of the subgenus, pp. 75-90 in ZooKeys 6 (6) on pages 76-79, DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.6.94, http://zenodo.org/record/576435 : {"references": ["Luhe M (1911) Acanthocephalen. In: Brauer A (Ed) Susswasserfauna Deutschlands. Eine Exkursionfauna. Gustav Fischer, Jena, 116 pp.", "Baylis HA (1928) Records of some parasitic worms from British vertebrates. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, Series 10, 1: 329 - 343.", "Baylis HA (1939) Further records of parasitic worms from British vertebrates. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, Series 11, 4: 473 - 497.", "Petrochenko VI (1958) Acanthocephalans of domestic and wild animals. Vol. 2. Academy of Science USSR, Moscow, 456 pp. (In Russian).", "Belopol'skaya MM (1983) Acanthocephalans from charadriiform birds in the European part of the USSR. Vestnik Leningradskovo Universiteta, Zoologiya 3: 17 - 25 (In Russian).", "Del Valle MT, Coy Otero A (1990) Nuevas notificaciones de helmintos en aves cubanas. Poeyana, 401: 1 - 4.", "Lundstrom A (1942) Die Acanthocephalen Schwedens, mit Ausnahme der Fischacanthocephalen von Susswasserstandorten. C. W. Lindstrom, Lund, 238 pp.", "Hansson HG (1997) NEAT (North East Atlantic Taxa): South Scandinavian marine \" Aschelminthes \" (excl. Nematoda) & other species poor phyla Check-List. Internet PDF. Ed., May 1997. http: // www. tmbl. gu. se / [accessed 3. I. 2009].", "Reimer LW (2002) Parasitische Wurmer (Helminthen) von Seevogeln der Ostseekuste. Seevogel, Zeitschrift Verein Jordsand, Hamburg 23: 66 - 76.", "Gibson DI (2004) Acanthocephala. Fauna Europaea version 1.1, http: // www. faunaeur. org / [accessed 3. I. 2009]."]}
format Text
author Dimitrova, Zlatka
author_facet Dimitrova, Zlatka
author_sort Dimitrova, Zlatka
title Plagiorhynchus (Plagiorhynchus) crassicollis Luhe 1911
title_short Plagiorhynchus (Plagiorhynchus) crassicollis Luhe 1911
title_full Plagiorhynchus (Plagiorhynchus) crassicollis Luhe 1911
title_fullStr Plagiorhynchus (Plagiorhynchus) crassicollis Luhe 1911
title_full_unstemmed Plagiorhynchus (Plagiorhynchus) crassicollis Luhe 1911
title_sort plagiorhynchus (plagiorhynchus) crassicollis luhe 1911
publisher Zenodo
publishDate 2009
url https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3792492
https://zenodo.org/record/3792492
long_lat ENVELOPE(-86.200,-86.200,-77.800,-77.800)
ENVELOPE(157.629,157.629,51.533,51.533)
geographic Greenland
Reimer
Vestnik
geographic_facet Greenland
Reimer
Vestnik
genre Charadrius hiaticula
Greenland
North East Atlantic
Phalaropus lobatus
genre_facet Charadrius hiaticula
Greenland
North East Atlantic
Phalaropus lobatus
op_relation http://zenodo.org/record/576435
http://publication.plazi.org/id/9F2C5149FFE3FF9EE71DFFF97C55FFA7
https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.6.94
http://zenodo.org/record/576435
http://publication.plazi.org/id/9F2C5149FFE3FF9EE71DFFF97C55FFA7
https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3787311
https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3792491
https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit
op_rights Open Access
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/legalcode
cc0-1.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
op_rightsnorm CC0
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3792492
https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.6.94
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3787311
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3792491
_version_ 1766389202189025280
spelling ftdatacite:10.5281/zenodo.3792492 2023-05-15T15:54:02+02:00 Plagiorhynchus (Plagiorhynchus) crassicollis Luhe 1911 Dimitrova, Zlatka 2009 https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3792492 https://zenodo.org/record/3792492 unknown Zenodo http://zenodo.org/record/576435 http://publication.plazi.org/id/9F2C5149FFE3FF9EE71DFFF97C55FFA7 https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.6.94 http://zenodo.org/record/576435 http://publication.plazi.org/id/9F2C5149FFE3FF9EE71DFFF97C55FFA7 https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3787311 https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3792491 https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit Open Access Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/legalcode cc0-1.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess CC0 Biodiversity Taxonomy Animalia Acanthocephala Palaeacanthocephala Polymorphida Plagiorhynchidae Plagiorhynchus Plagiorhynchus crassicollis article-journal ScholarlyArticle Text Taxonomic treatment 2009 ftdatacite https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3792492 https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.6.94 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3787311 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3792491 2022-03-10T14:34:24Z Plagiorhynchus ( Plagiorhynchus ) crassicollis (Villot, 1875) Lühe, 1911 Syn. Plagiorhynchus lanceolatus (von Linstow, 1876) Lühe, 1911 Material studied. BMNH 1928.2.17.91, from small intestine of Charadrius hiaticula L., Great Britain (detailed locality data not known), whole-mount of 2 specimens (1 slide) (material listed by Baylis, 1928); BMNH 1936.8.17.124-140, from small intestine of C . hiaticula , Weymouth, Dorset, England, wet material (material listed by Baylis 1939). Description (Fig. 1) Based on 10 male and 12 female specimens from Charadrius dubius , Weymouth, Dorset, England (BMNH 1936.8.17.124-140). General. Trunk elliptical, almost ovoid, narrowing posteriorly. Transverse vessels of lacunar system form dense reticulum of large polygons. Proboscis cylindrical, situated at angle to axis of trunk. Proboscis armament consists of 19-20 longitudinal rows of 13-14 (12) hooks; first 8 (9) hooks longest, next 2 smaller and last 3 hooks smallest; all hooks with posteriorly directed roots. Neck short (partly or completely withdrawn in some specimens), trapezoidal. Proboscis receptacle doublewalled. Lemnisci band-shaped (bifurcate in single specimen), longer than proboscis receptacle. Male. Trunk 2.4-5.2 long, 1.0-1.64 wide. Proboscis (completely everted in only 2 specimens) 0.56-0.62 long, 0.16 wide. Length of first 8 hooks – blade 32-42 µm, root 32-44 µm; length of next 2 hooks – blade 29 µm, root 25-32 µm; length of last 3 hooks – 25-27 (29) µm, root 13-22 µm. Neck (in 2 specimens) c .0.1 long. Proboscis receptacle 0.70-0.95 long and 0.16-0.25 wide. Lemnisci 1.0-2.6 long, 0.09-0.15 wide. Testes oval to spherical, 0.30-0.80 long, 0.23-0.41 wide, situated in tandem and slightly overlapping one another, in middle region of trunk. Cement glands 6 in number, of different lengths, 0.30-0.95 long, situated immediately posterior to hind testis. Duct of cement glands 0.35-0.65 long. Genital bursa (everted in single specimen) 0.25 long, 0.30 wide. Female. Trunk 2.64-7.0 long, 1.21-2.9 wide. Proboscis (completely everted in only 2 specimens) 0.66-0.7 long, 0.17-0.19 wide. Length of first 8 (9) hooks – blade 37-44 (49) µm, root 34-54 µm; length of next 2 hooks – blade 34-39 µm, root 27-39 µm; length of last 3 hooks blade – 17-29 µm, root 15-27 µm. Neck 0.15-0.17 long. Proboscis receptacle 0.72-1.1 long, 0.24-0.27 wide. Lemnisci 1.0-1.9 long, 0.1-0.13 wide. Female genital tract c .1.2-1.45 long. Vagina provided with 2 sphincters. Genital pore slightly subterminal, at 0.06-0.12 from posterior end of trunk. Fully-developed eggs were observed in 4 specimens (5.1-7.0 long). Eggs elongate-oval, shuttle-shaped, with polar prolongations, 91-134 (135) × 25-42 µm. Additional data. (based on 2 male specimens from C. hiaticula , BMNH 1928.2.17.91). Trunk 4.0- 4.7 in length, 1.4-1.55 wide. Proboscis 0.48-0.5 long. Proboscis armament consists of 20 longitudinal rows of 11-12 hooks in each row. Measurements and morphology of hooks are similar to material from Dorset. Neck very short (40-63 µm long). Testes spherical, 0.60-0.65 long, 0.75-0.87 wide. Cement glands 0.55-1.0 long. Remarks. There are only a few descriptions of this species (Lühe 1911; Petrochenko 1958; Belopol’skaya 1983; del Valle and Coy Otero 1990). Only female specimens were described by Petrochenko (1958) from Phalaropus lobatus (L.) [= P. hyperboreus (L.)] in Kazakhstan. Compared to previous descriptions of the same species (Lühe 1911; Belopol’skaya 1983), the specimens from Kazakhstan differ in the shape and the length of the trunk (elongate-cylindrical and 17 mm long versus oval and c . 7 mm long), the shape of the proboscis (oval versus cylindrical) and the number of longitudinal rows of hooks (16 longitudinal rows of hooks versus 18-20). In addition, there are differences in the dimensions of the eggs: 84 × 16 µm (Petrochenko 1958) versus 110 × 49 µm (Lühe 1911). Consequently, it seems likely that the specimens from Kazakhstan described by Petrochenko (1958) belong to another species. Del Valle and Coy Otero (1990) reported P . crassicollis from Charadrius wilsonia wilsonia Ord in Cuba. According to their description, the armature of the proboscis consists of 18 longitudinal rows of 10-11 hooks per row. However, judging by the drawing of the proboscis (figure 1c in del Valle and Coy Otero 1990), the number of hooks per row is at least 18. Comparing the morphometric data of the present specimens with the descriptions of Lühe (1911) and Belopol’skaya (1983), there are several differences. The maximum number of hooks per longitudinal row in the specimens studied is greater, i.e. 11-14 versus 11-12 (Lühe 1911) or 13 (Belopol’skaya 1983). The male specimens among our material (see ‘Additional data’ above) are in close accordance with the description of Lühe (1911); however, they have a smaller proboscis, i.e. 0.48-0.50 versus 0.60 mm. A difference in the females relates to the size of eggs, which are larger in our specimens, i.e. 91-134 × 25-42 µm compared to 110 × 49 µm (Lühe 1911) and 88-102 × 27-34 µm (del Valle and Coy Otero 1990). One immature female from the same host specimen (Dorset material) possesses a longer proboscis (0.76 mm) and a greater number of hooks per row (15-16). According to these characters, we consider it as belonging to Plagiorhynchus odhneri Lundström, 1942 (see ‘Additional data’ for P. odhneri ). P . ( P .) crassicollis was previously reported from Charadrius hiaticula (= Aegialitis hiaticula ) in the United Kingdom (Baylis 1928, 1939), once apparently in a mixed infection with P . odhneri (see below). It is mainly a parasite of charadriiform birds throughout the western Palaearctic [(Germany, France, Sweden, Switzerland, Ukraine, Russia (the White and Baltic Sea coasts)] (Lühe 1911; Belopol’skaya 1983; Hansson 1997; Reimer 2002; Gibson 2004). There are also occasional records from the Nearctic [Greenland (Hansson 1997)] and Neotropical [Cuba (del Valle and Coy Otero 1990)] Regions. : Published as part of Dimitrova, Zlatka, 2009, Acanthocephalans of the nominotypical subgenus of Plagiorhynchus (Plagiorhynchidae) from charadriiform birds in the collection of the Natural History Museum, London, with a key to the species of the subgenus, pp. 75-90 in ZooKeys 6 (6) on pages 76-79, DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.6.94, http://zenodo.org/record/576435 : {"references": ["Luhe M (1911) Acanthocephalen. In: Brauer A (Ed) Susswasserfauna Deutschlands. Eine Exkursionfauna. Gustav Fischer, Jena, 116 pp.", "Baylis HA (1928) Records of some parasitic worms from British vertebrates. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, Series 10, 1: 329 - 343.", "Baylis HA (1939) Further records of parasitic worms from British vertebrates. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, Series 11, 4: 473 - 497.", "Petrochenko VI (1958) Acanthocephalans of domestic and wild animals. Vol. 2. Academy of Science USSR, Moscow, 456 pp. (In Russian).", "Belopol'skaya MM (1983) Acanthocephalans from charadriiform birds in the European part of the USSR. Vestnik Leningradskovo Universiteta, Zoologiya 3: 17 - 25 (In Russian).", "Del Valle MT, Coy Otero A (1990) Nuevas notificaciones de helmintos en aves cubanas. Poeyana, 401: 1 - 4.", "Lundstrom A (1942) Die Acanthocephalen Schwedens, mit Ausnahme der Fischacanthocephalen von Susswasserstandorten. C. W. Lindstrom, Lund, 238 pp.", "Hansson HG (1997) NEAT (North East Atlantic Taxa): South Scandinavian marine \" Aschelminthes \" (excl. Nematoda) & other species poor phyla Check-List. Internet PDF. Ed., May 1997. http: // www. tmbl. gu. se / [accessed 3. I. 2009].", "Reimer LW (2002) Parasitische Wurmer (Helminthen) von Seevogeln der Ostseekuste. Seevogel, Zeitschrift Verein Jordsand, Hamburg 23: 66 - 76.", "Gibson DI (2004) Acanthocephala. Fauna Europaea version 1.1, http: // www. faunaeur. org / [accessed 3. I. 2009]."]} Text Charadrius hiaticula Greenland North East Atlantic Phalaropus lobatus DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology) Greenland Reimer ENVELOPE(-86.200,-86.200,-77.800,-77.800) Vestnik ENVELOPE(157.629,157.629,51.533,51.533)