Opaque Lowermost Mantle

Earth’s lowermost mantle displays complex geological structures that likely result from heterogeneous thermal and electromagnetic interaction with the core. Geophysical models of the core-mantle boundary (CMB) region rely on the thermal and electrical conductivities of appropriate geomaterials which...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lobanov, Sergey S., Soubiran, Francois, Holtgrewe, Nicholas, Badro, James, Lin, Jung-Fu, Goncharov, Alexander F.
Format: Report
Language:unknown
Published: Zenodo 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3716258
https://zenodo.org/record/3716258
id ftdatacite:10.5281/zenodo.3716258
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdatacite:10.5281/zenodo.3716258 2023-05-15T16:19:40+02:00 Opaque Lowermost Mantle Lobanov, Sergey S. Soubiran, Francois Holtgrewe, Nicholas Badro, James Lin, Jung-Fu Goncharov, Alexander F. 2020 https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3716258 https://zenodo.org/record/3716258 unknown Zenodo https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3716257 Open Access Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode cc-by-4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess CC-BY Preprint Text article-journal ScholarlyArticle 2020 ftdatacite https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3716258 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3716257 2021-11-05T12:55:41Z Earth’s lowermost mantle displays complex geological structures that likely result from heterogeneous thermal and electromagnetic interaction with the core. Geophysical models of the core-mantle boundary (CMB) region rely on the thermal and electrical conductivities of appropriate geomaterials which, however, have never been probed at representative pressure and temperature (P-T) conditions. Here we report on the opacity of single crystalline bridgmanite and ferropericlase, which is linked to both their radiative and electrical conductivity, measured in dynamically- and statically-heated diamond anvil cells as well as computed from first-principles at CMB conditions. Our results show that light absorption in the visible spectral range is enhanced upon heating in both minerals but the rate of change in opacity with temperature is a factor of six higher in ferropericlase. As a result, bridgmanite in the lowermost mantle is moderately transparent while ferropericlase is highly opaque. Our measurements suggest a very low (< 1 W/m/K) and largely temperature-independent radiative conductivity in the lowermost mantle, at odds with previous studies. This implies that the radiative mechanism has not contributed significantly to cooling the Earth’s core throughout the geologic time and points to a present-day CMB heat flow of 9-11 TW. Opaque ferropericlase is electrically conducting and mediates strong core-mantle electromagnetic coupling, explaining the intradecadal oscillations in the length of day, low secular geomagnetic variations in Central Pacific, and the preferred paths of geomagnetic pole reversals. Report Geomagnetic Pole DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology) Anvil ENVELOPE(-64.267,-64.267,-65.239,-65.239) Pacific
institution Open Polar
collection DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology)
op_collection_id ftdatacite
language unknown
description Earth’s lowermost mantle displays complex geological structures that likely result from heterogeneous thermal and electromagnetic interaction with the core. Geophysical models of the core-mantle boundary (CMB) region rely on the thermal and electrical conductivities of appropriate geomaterials which, however, have never been probed at representative pressure and temperature (P-T) conditions. Here we report on the opacity of single crystalline bridgmanite and ferropericlase, which is linked to both their radiative and electrical conductivity, measured in dynamically- and statically-heated diamond anvil cells as well as computed from first-principles at CMB conditions. Our results show that light absorption in the visible spectral range is enhanced upon heating in both minerals but the rate of change in opacity with temperature is a factor of six higher in ferropericlase. As a result, bridgmanite in the lowermost mantle is moderately transparent while ferropericlase is highly opaque. Our measurements suggest a very low (< 1 W/m/K) and largely temperature-independent radiative conductivity in the lowermost mantle, at odds with previous studies. This implies that the radiative mechanism has not contributed significantly to cooling the Earth’s core throughout the geologic time and points to a present-day CMB heat flow of 9-11 TW. Opaque ferropericlase is electrically conducting and mediates strong core-mantle electromagnetic coupling, explaining the intradecadal oscillations in the length of day, low secular geomagnetic variations in Central Pacific, and the preferred paths of geomagnetic pole reversals.
format Report
author Lobanov, Sergey S.
Soubiran, Francois
Holtgrewe, Nicholas
Badro, James
Lin, Jung-Fu
Goncharov, Alexander F.
spellingShingle Lobanov, Sergey S.
Soubiran, Francois
Holtgrewe, Nicholas
Badro, James
Lin, Jung-Fu
Goncharov, Alexander F.
Opaque Lowermost Mantle
author_facet Lobanov, Sergey S.
Soubiran, Francois
Holtgrewe, Nicholas
Badro, James
Lin, Jung-Fu
Goncharov, Alexander F.
author_sort Lobanov, Sergey S.
title Opaque Lowermost Mantle
title_short Opaque Lowermost Mantle
title_full Opaque Lowermost Mantle
title_fullStr Opaque Lowermost Mantle
title_full_unstemmed Opaque Lowermost Mantle
title_sort opaque lowermost mantle
publisher Zenodo
publishDate 2020
url https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3716258
https://zenodo.org/record/3716258
long_lat ENVELOPE(-64.267,-64.267,-65.239,-65.239)
geographic Anvil
Pacific
geographic_facet Anvil
Pacific
genre Geomagnetic Pole
genre_facet Geomagnetic Pole
op_relation https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3716257
op_rights Open Access
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
cc-by-4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
op_rightsnorm CC-BY
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3716258
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3716257
_version_ 1766006070846685184