Heterophoxus Shoemaker 1925

Identification key to species of Heterophoxus of the world 1. Epimeral plate 3, posteroventral corner with an acute projection.................................................... 3 – Epimeral plate 3, posteroventral corner without projection..............................................................

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andrade, Luiz F., Senna, André R.
Format: Text
Language:unknown
Published: Zenodo 2020
Subjects:
ren
Online Access:https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3629794
https://zenodo.org/record/3629794
id ftdatacite:10.5281/zenodo.3629794
record_format openpolar
institution Open Polar
collection DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology)
op_collection_id ftdatacite
language unknown
topic Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Malacostraca
Amphipoda
Phoxocephalidae
Heterophoxus
spellingShingle Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Malacostraca
Amphipoda
Phoxocephalidae
Heterophoxus
Andrade, Luiz F.
Senna, André R.
Heterophoxus Shoemaker 1925
topic_facet Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Malacostraca
Amphipoda
Phoxocephalidae
Heterophoxus
description Identification key to species of Heterophoxus of the world 1. Epimeral plate 3, posteroventral corner with an acute projection.................................................... 3 – Epimeral plate 3, posteroventral corner without projection............................................................. 2 2. Uropod 1, rami subequal................................................................................ H. opus Griffiths, 1975 – Uropod 1, outer ramus much shorter than inner............................... H. cephalodens Griffiths, 1975 3. Epimeral plate 3, acute projection medium to long.......................................................................... 4 – Epimeral plate 3, acute projection short............................................. H. videns K.H. Barnard, 1930 4. Pereopod 7, basis reaching apex of merus........................................................................................ 5 – Pereopod 7, basis not reaching apex of merus.................................................................................. 7 5. Uropod 1, rami subequal................................................................................................................... 6 – Uropod 1, inner ramus about twice the length of outer.... H. pellusidus Ren in Ren & Huang, 1991 6. Uropod 2, peduncle longer than inner ramus........................ H. ophthalmicus (Schellenberg, 1925) – Uropod 2, peduncle shorter than inner ramus................................ H. ellisi Jarret & Bousfield, 1994 7. Antenna 2, article 4 without posteroproximal lobe.......................................................................... 8 – Antenna 2, article 4 with posteroproximal lobe.......................................... H. despard Alonso, 2012 8. Pereopod 4, coxa, posterodorsal margin with moderate to strong excavation................................. 9 – Pereopod 4, coxa, posterodorsal margin with weak excavation........ H. pennatus Shoemaker, 1925 9. Epimeral plates 1–3, posterior margin without setules................................................................... 10 – Epimeral plates 1–3, posterior margin covered with setules......................... H. shoemakeri sp. nov. 10. Pereopod 7, merus stout, posterodistal lobe produced................... H. trichosus K.H. Barnard, 1932 – Pereopod 7, merus slender, posterodistal lobe not produced................. H. oculatus (Holmes, 1908) : Published as part of Andrade, Luiz F. & Senna, André R., 2020, A novel species of Heterophoxus Shoemaker, 1925 (Crustacea, Amphipoda, Phoxocephalidae) from southeast and southern Brazil, with an identification key to world species of the genus, pp. 1-16 in European Journal of Taxonomy 592 on page 14, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2020.592, http://zenodo.org/record/3626084 : {"references": ["Griffiths C. L. 1975. The Amphipoda of Southern Africa Part 5. The Gammaridea and Caprellidea of the Cape Province west of Cape Agulhas. Annals of the South African Museum 67 (5): 91 - 181.", "Barnard K. H. 1930. Crustacea. Part XI. Amphipoda. British Antarctic (\" Terra Nova \") Expedition, 1910. Natural History Report, Zoology 8 (4): 307 - 454. Available from https: // biodiversitylibrary. org / page / 49462829 [accessed 20 Dec. 2019].", "Ren X. & Huang L. 1991. Studies on Gammaridea and Caprellidea (Crustacea: Amphipoda) from the northwest waters off the Antarctic Peninsula. Studia Marina Sinica 32: 185 - 323.", "Jarret N. E. & Bousfield E. L. 1994. The amphipod superfamily Phoxocephaloidea on the pacific coast of North America. Family Phoxocephalidae. Part II. Subfamilies Pontharpiniinae, Paharpiniinae, Brolginae, Phoxocephalinae, and Harpiniinae. Systematics and distributional ecology. Amphipacifica 3 (4): 71 - 150.", "Alonso G. M. 2012. Amphipod crustaceans (Corophiidea and Gammaridea) associated with holdfasts of Macrocystis pyrifera from the Beagle Channel (Argentina) and additional records from the Southwestern Atlantic. Journal of Natural History 46 (29 - 30): 1799 - 1894. https: // doi. org / 10.1080 / 00222933.2012.692825"]}
format Text
author Andrade, Luiz F.
Senna, André R.
author_facet Andrade, Luiz F.
Senna, André R.
author_sort Andrade, Luiz F.
title Heterophoxus Shoemaker 1925
title_short Heterophoxus Shoemaker 1925
title_full Heterophoxus Shoemaker 1925
title_fullStr Heterophoxus Shoemaker 1925
title_full_unstemmed Heterophoxus Shoemaker 1925
title_sort heterophoxus shoemaker 1925
publisher Zenodo
publishDate 2020
url https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3629794
https://zenodo.org/record/3629794
geographic Antarctic
The Antarctic
Antarctic Peninsula
Pacific
Argentina
geographic_facet Antarctic
The Antarctic
Antarctic Peninsula
Pacific
Argentina
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctic Peninsula
ren
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctic Peninsula
ren
op_relation http://zenodo.org/record/3626084
http://publication.plazi.org/id/FFBBB71FFFF41037CF7AD712DC74FFF5
http://zoobank.org/31DF91C1-8CF2-4E84-AD18-F4899822690D
https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit
https://dx.doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2020.592
http://zenodo.org/record/3626084
http://publication.plazi.org/id/FFBBB71FFFF41037CF7AD712DC74FFF5
http://zoobank.org/31DF91C1-8CF2-4E84-AD18-F4899822690D
https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3629793
https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit
op_rights Open Access
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/legalcode
cc0-1.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
op_rightsnorm CC0
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3629794
https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2020.592
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3629793
_version_ 1766217596157296640
spelling ftdatacite:10.5281/zenodo.3629794 2023-05-15T13:45:14+02:00 Heterophoxus Shoemaker 1925 Andrade, Luiz F. Senna, André R. 2020 https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3629794 https://zenodo.org/record/3629794 unknown Zenodo http://zenodo.org/record/3626084 http://publication.plazi.org/id/FFBBB71FFFF41037CF7AD712DC74FFF5 http://zoobank.org/31DF91C1-8CF2-4E84-AD18-F4899822690D https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit https://dx.doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2020.592 http://zenodo.org/record/3626084 http://publication.plazi.org/id/FFBBB71FFFF41037CF7AD712DC74FFF5 http://zoobank.org/31DF91C1-8CF2-4E84-AD18-F4899822690D https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3629793 https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit Open Access Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/legalcode cc0-1.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess CC0 Biodiversity Taxonomy Animalia Arthropoda Malacostraca Amphipoda Phoxocephalidae Heterophoxus Taxonomic treatment article-journal Text ScholarlyArticle 2020 ftdatacite https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3629794 https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2020.592 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3629793 2022-02-09T14:14:33Z Identification key to species of Heterophoxus of the world 1. Epimeral plate 3, posteroventral corner with an acute projection.................................................... 3 – Epimeral plate 3, posteroventral corner without projection............................................................. 2 2. Uropod 1, rami subequal................................................................................ H. opus Griffiths, 1975 – Uropod 1, outer ramus much shorter than inner............................... H. cephalodens Griffiths, 1975 3. Epimeral plate 3, acute projection medium to long.......................................................................... 4 – Epimeral plate 3, acute projection short............................................. H. videns K.H. Barnard, 1930 4. Pereopod 7, basis reaching apex of merus........................................................................................ 5 – Pereopod 7, basis not reaching apex of merus.................................................................................. 7 5. Uropod 1, rami subequal................................................................................................................... 6 – Uropod 1, inner ramus about twice the length of outer.... H. pellusidus Ren in Ren & Huang, 1991 6. Uropod 2, peduncle longer than inner ramus........................ H. ophthalmicus (Schellenberg, 1925) – Uropod 2, peduncle shorter than inner ramus................................ H. ellisi Jarret & Bousfield, 1994 7. Antenna 2, article 4 without posteroproximal lobe.......................................................................... 8 – Antenna 2, article 4 with posteroproximal lobe.......................................... H. despard Alonso, 2012 8. Pereopod 4, coxa, posterodorsal margin with moderate to strong excavation................................. 9 – Pereopod 4, coxa, posterodorsal margin with weak excavation........ H. pennatus Shoemaker, 1925 9. Epimeral plates 1–3, posterior margin without setules................................................................... 10 – Epimeral plates 1–3, posterior margin covered with setules......................... H. shoemakeri sp. nov. 10. Pereopod 7, merus stout, posterodistal lobe produced................... H. trichosus K.H. Barnard, 1932 – Pereopod 7, merus slender, posterodistal lobe not produced................. H. oculatus (Holmes, 1908) : Published as part of Andrade, Luiz F. & Senna, André R., 2020, A novel species of Heterophoxus Shoemaker, 1925 (Crustacea, Amphipoda, Phoxocephalidae) from southeast and southern Brazil, with an identification key to world species of the genus, pp. 1-16 in European Journal of Taxonomy 592 on page 14, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2020.592, http://zenodo.org/record/3626084 : {"references": ["Griffiths C. L. 1975. The Amphipoda of Southern Africa Part 5. The Gammaridea and Caprellidea of the Cape Province west of Cape Agulhas. Annals of the South African Museum 67 (5): 91 - 181.", "Barnard K. H. 1930. Crustacea. Part XI. Amphipoda. British Antarctic (\" Terra Nova \") Expedition, 1910. Natural History Report, Zoology 8 (4): 307 - 454. Available from https: // biodiversitylibrary. org / page / 49462829 [accessed 20 Dec. 2019].", "Ren X. & Huang L. 1991. Studies on Gammaridea and Caprellidea (Crustacea: Amphipoda) from the northwest waters off the Antarctic Peninsula. Studia Marina Sinica 32: 185 - 323.", "Jarret N. E. & Bousfield E. L. 1994. The amphipod superfamily Phoxocephaloidea on the pacific coast of North America. Family Phoxocephalidae. Part II. Subfamilies Pontharpiniinae, Paharpiniinae, Brolginae, Phoxocephalinae, and Harpiniinae. Systematics and distributional ecology. Amphipacifica 3 (4): 71 - 150.", "Alonso G. M. 2012. Amphipod crustaceans (Corophiidea and Gammaridea) associated with holdfasts of Macrocystis pyrifera from the Beagle Channel (Argentina) and additional records from the Southwestern Atlantic. Journal of Natural History 46 (29 - 30): 1799 - 1894. https: // doi. org / 10.1080 / 00222933.2012.692825"]} Text Antarc* Antarctic Antarctic Peninsula ren DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology) Antarctic The Antarctic Antarctic Peninsula Pacific Argentina