Scolopocryptops melanostoma
1. Scolopocryptops melanostoma Newport, 1845 Figs 3–6 Otocryptops melanostomus : Attems, 1930: 263; Scolopocryptops melanostoma : Chagas, 2010: 164; Scolopocryptops melanostoma : Schileyko, 2014: 154. Material. E Indonesia, West Papua Province, S Bird’s Neck: 1 ad [spm 1, No. 7503], Kaimana 47 km E,...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Text |
Language: | unknown |
Published: |
Zenodo
2016
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3511087 https://zenodo.org/record/3511087 |
id |
ftdatacite:10.5281/zenodo.3511087 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology) |
op_collection_id |
ftdatacite |
language |
unknown |
topic |
Biodiversity Taxonomy Animalia Arthropoda Chilopoda Scolopendromorpha Scolopocryptopidae Scolopocryptops Scolopocryptops melanostoma |
spellingShingle |
Biodiversity Taxonomy Animalia Arthropoda Chilopoda Scolopendromorpha Scolopocryptopidae Scolopocryptops Scolopocryptops melanostoma Schileyko, Arkady A. Stoev, Pavel E. Scolopocryptops melanostoma |
topic_facet |
Biodiversity Taxonomy Animalia Arthropoda Chilopoda Scolopendromorpha Scolopocryptopidae Scolopocryptops Scolopocryptops melanostoma |
description |
1. Scolopocryptops melanostoma Newport, 1845 Figs 3–6 Otocryptops melanostomus : Attems, 1930: 263; Scolopocryptops melanostoma : Chagas, 2010: 164; Scolopocryptops melanostoma : Schileyko, 2014: 154. Material. E Indonesia, West Papua Province, S Bird’s Neck: 1 ad [spm 1, No. 7503], Kaimana 47 km E, Triton bay, environs Kamaka (former Warika) village, lake Kamakawalar, 03°45’33”S, 134°12’05”E, 90 m, primeval lowland rainforest on limestone, 09.09.2010, leg. M. Kalninsh; 1 ad [spm 2, No. 7504], Kaimana 7–9 km NW, 25– 200 m, primeval lowland rainforest on limestone, 05.09.2010, leg. DT; 1 ad [spm 3, СDT], Kaimana 40 km E, Triton bay, environs Lobo village, 03°45’00”S, 134°05’33”E, 700–900 m, primeval rainforest on limestone, 17.09.2010, leg. M. Kalninsh. Range. Mexico; Central America (Guatemala, Honduras, Costa Rica, Panama), Greater Antilles (Puerto Rico, Haiti), Lesser Antilles (Martinique, Saint Vincent and Grenadines, Trinidad); South America (Venezuela, Colombia, Ecuador, Peru, Brazil); Australasia (Fiji Islands), Indochina (Nicobar Island, Vietnam), Taiwan, Philippines, E Indonesia, Papua New Guinea. Remarks. Spiracles of spm 1 and 2 were filled up by white thin thread-like parasites, which are superficially similar to nematods (Fig. 3) and were loosely attached to the host and easy to remove. These parasites were missing in spm 3. Morphologically, the studied specimens fit well to the diagnosis of S. melanostoma as per Schileyko (2014), including also the presence of three longitudinal ridges at the mesal surface of forcipular tarsungula (see Fig. 2 in Schileyko (2014)) and basal transverse suture of process of forcipular trochanteroprefemur (Fig. 4; see also Fig. 3 in Schileyko (2014)). West Papuan specimens are considerably larger than those from Venezuela used for comparison (the type locality of this species is St.Vincent in Lesser Antilles, thus the Venezuelan material can reasonably be used as a reference). Furthermore, they differ from the latter also by the following features: 1) tergites with irregular patches of a dark pigment (Fig. 5), 2) 4 (vs. 6) basal antennomeres being glabrous, 3) pretarsus of maxillae 2 with one (upper) very short but well-developed and darkly sclerotized accessory spine (Fig. 4), 4) coxopleural process (Fig. 6) conical (triangular) and comparatively short (cylindrical, slender and nearly twice as long as sternite 23 in the examined Venezuelan specimen) (see Fig. 6 in Schileyko (2014)), 5) tip of coxopleural process and a very narrow posterior area poreless (Fig. 6), 6) legs 1–20 (vs 1–18) with two tibial and one tarsal spur, leg 21 (vs 19) with tarsal spur only, leg 22 without spurs, and 7) all legs lacking accessory spines (though some rudiments recognizable at x85 magnification) vs legs 1–9 with minor accessory spines. Attems (1930: 259, 263) considered the lack of accessory spines as a diagnostic character for S. melanostoma . : Published as part of Schileyko, Arkady A. & Stoev, Pavel E., 2016, Scolopendromorpha of New Guinea and adjacent islands (Myriapoda, Chilopoda), pp. 247-280 in Zootaxa 4147 (3) on page 250, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4147.3.3, http://zenodo.org/record/264843 : {"references": ["Attems, C. (1930) Myriopoda. 2. Scolopendromorpha. Das Tierreich 54. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 1 - 308.", "Schileyko, A. (2014) A contribution to the centipede fauna of Venezuela (Chilopoda: Scolopendromorpha). Zootaxa, 3821 (1), 151 - 192. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 3821.2.1"]} |
format |
Text |
author |
Schileyko, Arkady A. Stoev, Pavel E. |
author_facet |
Schileyko, Arkady A. Stoev, Pavel E. |
author_sort |
Schileyko, Arkady A. |
title |
Scolopocryptops melanostoma |
title_short |
Scolopocryptops melanostoma |
title_full |
Scolopocryptops melanostoma |
title_fullStr |
Scolopocryptops melanostoma |
title_full_unstemmed |
Scolopocryptops melanostoma |
title_sort |
scolopocryptops melanostoma |
publisher |
Zenodo |
publishDate |
2016 |
url |
https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3511087 https://zenodo.org/record/3511087 |
long_lat |
ENVELOPE(-59.515,-59.515,50.600,50.600) ENVELOPE(-60.734,-60.734,-63.816,-63.816) ENVELOPE(-55.615,-55.615,49.517,49.517) ENVELOPE(-92.384,-92.384,76.602,76.602) |
geographic |
Saint-Vincent Trinidad Triton Triton Bay |
geographic_facet |
Saint-Vincent Trinidad Triton Triton Bay |
genre |
Triton Bay |
genre_facet |
Triton Bay |
op_relation |
http://zenodo.org/record/264843 http://publication.plazi.org/id/FFC44A1F0E48B00DFFCBFF9EBC17FFF9 http://treatment.plazi.org/id/0392244DFF8D937EFF6BFF08FAFCFCAD http://zoobank.org/6238B25B-787F-4F50-BFAE-03CD33D0F699 https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit https://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4147.3.3 http://zenodo.org/record/264843 http://publication.plazi.org/id/FFC44A1F0E48B00DFFCBFF9EBC17FFF9 https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.264845 https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.264846 https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3507000 http://treatment.plazi.org/id/0392244DFF8D937EFF6BFF08FAFCFCAD http://zoobank.org/6238B25B-787F-4F50-BFAE-03CD33D0F699 https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3511086 https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit |
op_rights |
Open Access Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/legalcode cc0-1.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
op_rightsnorm |
CC0 |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3511087 https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4147.3.3 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.264845 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.264846 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3507000 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3511086 |
_version_ |
1766218370161573888 |
spelling |
ftdatacite:10.5281/zenodo.3511087 2023-05-15T18:33:43+02:00 Scolopocryptops melanostoma Schileyko, Arkady A. Stoev, Pavel E. 2016 https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3511087 https://zenodo.org/record/3511087 unknown Zenodo http://zenodo.org/record/264843 http://publication.plazi.org/id/FFC44A1F0E48B00DFFCBFF9EBC17FFF9 http://treatment.plazi.org/id/0392244DFF8D937EFF6BFF08FAFCFCAD http://zoobank.org/6238B25B-787F-4F50-BFAE-03CD33D0F699 https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit https://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4147.3.3 http://zenodo.org/record/264843 http://publication.plazi.org/id/FFC44A1F0E48B00DFFCBFF9EBC17FFF9 https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.264845 https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.264846 https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3507000 http://treatment.plazi.org/id/0392244DFF8D937EFF6BFF08FAFCFCAD http://zoobank.org/6238B25B-787F-4F50-BFAE-03CD33D0F699 https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3511086 https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit Open Access Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/legalcode cc0-1.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess CC0 Biodiversity Taxonomy Animalia Arthropoda Chilopoda Scolopendromorpha Scolopocryptopidae Scolopocryptops Scolopocryptops melanostoma article-journal ScholarlyArticle Text Taxonomic treatment 2016 ftdatacite https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3511087 https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4147.3.3 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.264845 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.264846 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3507000 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3511086 2022-03-10T12:09:25Z 1. Scolopocryptops melanostoma Newport, 1845 Figs 3–6 Otocryptops melanostomus : Attems, 1930: 263; Scolopocryptops melanostoma : Chagas, 2010: 164; Scolopocryptops melanostoma : Schileyko, 2014: 154. Material. E Indonesia, West Papua Province, S Bird’s Neck: 1 ad [spm 1, No. 7503], Kaimana 47 km E, Triton bay, environs Kamaka (former Warika) village, lake Kamakawalar, 03°45’33”S, 134°12’05”E, 90 m, primeval lowland rainforest on limestone, 09.09.2010, leg. M. Kalninsh; 1 ad [spm 2, No. 7504], Kaimana 7–9 km NW, 25– 200 m, primeval lowland rainforest on limestone, 05.09.2010, leg. DT; 1 ad [spm 3, СDT], Kaimana 40 km E, Triton bay, environs Lobo village, 03°45’00”S, 134°05’33”E, 700–900 m, primeval rainforest on limestone, 17.09.2010, leg. M. Kalninsh. Range. Mexico; Central America (Guatemala, Honduras, Costa Rica, Panama), Greater Antilles (Puerto Rico, Haiti), Lesser Antilles (Martinique, Saint Vincent and Grenadines, Trinidad); South America (Venezuela, Colombia, Ecuador, Peru, Brazil); Australasia (Fiji Islands), Indochina (Nicobar Island, Vietnam), Taiwan, Philippines, E Indonesia, Papua New Guinea. Remarks. Spiracles of spm 1 and 2 were filled up by white thin thread-like parasites, which are superficially similar to nematods (Fig. 3) and were loosely attached to the host and easy to remove. These parasites were missing in spm 3. Morphologically, the studied specimens fit well to the diagnosis of S. melanostoma as per Schileyko (2014), including also the presence of three longitudinal ridges at the mesal surface of forcipular tarsungula (see Fig. 2 in Schileyko (2014)) and basal transverse suture of process of forcipular trochanteroprefemur (Fig. 4; see also Fig. 3 in Schileyko (2014)). West Papuan specimens are considerably larger than those from Venezuela used for comparison (the type locality of this species is St.Vincent in Lesser Antilles, thus the Venezuelan material can reasonably be used as a reference). Furthermore, they differ from the latter also by the following features: 1) tergites with irregular patches of a dark pigment (Fig. 5), 2) 4 (vs. 6) basal antennomeres being glabrous, 3) pretarsus of maxillae 2 with one (upper) very short but well-developed and darkly sclerotized accessory spine (Fig. 4), 4) coxopleural process (Fig. 6) conical (triangular) and comparatively short (cylindrical, slender and nearly twice as long as sternite 23 in the examined Venezuelan specimen) (see Fig. 6 in Schileyko (2014)), 5) tip of coxopleural process and a very narrow posterior area poreless (Fig. 6), 6) legs 1–20 (vs 1–18) with two tibial and one tarsal spur, leg 21 (vs 19) with tarsal spur only, leg 22 without spurs, and 7) all legs lacking accessory spines (though some rudiments recognizable at x85 magnification) vs legs 1–9 with minor accessory spines. Attems (1930: 259, 263) considered the lack of accessory spines as a diagnostic character for S. melanostoma . : Published as part of Schileyko, Arkady A. & Stoev, Pavel E., 2016, Scolopendromorpha of New Guinea and adjacent islands (Myriapoda, Chilopoda), pp. 247-280 in Zootaxa 4147 (3) on page 250, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4147.3.3, http://zenodo.org/record/264843 : {"references": ["Attems, C. (1930) Myriopoda. 2. Scolopendromorpha. Das Tierreich 54. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 1 - 308.", "Schileyko, A. (2014) A contribution to the centipede fauna of Venezuela (Chilopoda: Scolopendromorpha). Zootaxa, 3821 (1), 151 - 192. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 3821.2.1"]} Text Triton Bay DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology) Saint-Vincent ENVELOPE(-59.515,-59.515,50.600,50.600) Trinidad ENVELOPE(-60.734,-60.734,-63.816,-63.816) Triton ENVELOPE(-55.615,-55.615,49.517,49.517) Triton Bay ENVELOPE(-92.384,-92.384,76.602,76.602) |