Scolopocryptops melanostoma

1. Scolopocryptops melanostoma Newport, 1845 Figs 3–6 Otocryptops melanostomus : Attems, 1930: 263; Scolopocryptops melanostoma : Chagas, 2010: 164; Scolopocryptops melanostoma : Schileyko, 2014: 154. Material. E Indonesia, West Papua Province, S Bird’s Neck: 1 ad [spm 1, No. 7503], Kaimana 47 km E,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Schileyko, Arkady A., Stoev, Pavel E.
Format: Text
Language:unknown
Published: Zenodo 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3511087
https://zenodo.org/record/3511087
id ftdatacite:10.5281/zenodo.3511087
record_format openpolar
institution Open Polar
collection DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology)
op_collection_id ftdatacite
language unknown
topic Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Chilopoda
Scolopendromorpha
Scolopocryptopidae
Scolopocryptops
Scolopocryptops melanostoma
spellingShingle Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Chilopoda
Scolopendromorpha
Scolopocryptopidae
Scolopocryptops
Scolopocryptops melanostoma
Schileyko, Arkady A.
Stoev, Pavel E.
Scolopocryptops melanostoma
topic_facet Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Chilopoda
Scolopendromorpha
Scolopocryptopidae
Scolopocryptops
Scolopocryptops melanostoma
description 1. Scolopocryptops melanostoma Newport, 1845 Figs 3–6 Otocryptops melanostomus : Attems, 1930: 263; Scolopocryptops melanostoma : Chagas, 2010: 164; Scolopocryptops melanostoma : Schileyko, 2014: 154. Material. E Indonesia, West Papua Province, S Bird’s Neck: 1 ad [spm 1, No. 7503], Kaimana 47 km E, Triton bay, environs Kamaka (former Warika) village, lake Kamakawalar, 03°45’33”S, 134°12’05”E, 90 m, primeval lowland rainforest on limestone, 09.09.2010, leg. M. Kalninsh; 1 ad [spm 2, No. 7504], Kaimana 7–9 km NW, 25– 200 m, primeval lowland rainforest on limestone, 05.09.2010, leg. DT; 1 ad [spm 3, СDT], Kaimana 40 km E, Triton bay, environs Lobo village, 03°45’00”S, 134°05’33”E, 700–900 m, primeval rainforest on limestone, 17.09.2010, leg. M. Kalninsh. Range. Mexico; Central America (Guatemala, Honduras, Costa Rica, Panama), Greater Antilles (Puerto Rico, Haiti), Lesser Antilles (Martinique, Saint Vincent and Grenadines, Trinidad); South America (Venezuela, Colombia, Ecuador, Peru, Brazil); Australasia (Fiji Islands), Indochina (Nicobar Island, Vietnam), Taiwan, Philippines, E Indonesia, Papua New Guinea. Remarks. Spiracles of spm 1 and 2 were filled up by white thin thread-like parasites, which are superficially similar to nematods (Fig. 3) and were loosely attached to the host and easy to remove. These parasites were missing in spm 3. Morphologically, the studied specimens fit well to the diagnosis of S. melanostoma as per Schileyko (2014), including also the presence of three longitudinal ridges at the mesal surface of forcipular tarsungula (see Fig. 2 in Schileyko (2014)) and basal transverse suture of process of forcipular trochanteroprefemur (Fig. 4; see also Fig. 3 in Schileyko (2014)). West Papuan specimens are considerably larger than those from Venezuela used for comparison (the type locality of this species is St.Vincent in Lesser Antilles, thus the Venezuelan material can reasonably be used as a reference). Furthermore, they differ from the latter also by the following features: 1) tergites with irregular patches of a dark pigment (Fig. 5), 2) 4 (vs. 6) basal antennomeres being glabrous, 3) pretarsus of maxillae 2 with one (upper) very short but well-developed and darkly sclerotized accessory spine (Fig. 4), 4) coxopleural process (Fig. 6) conical (triangular) and comparatively short (cylindrical, slender and nearly twice as long as sternite 23 in the examined Venezuelan specimen) (see Fig. 6 in Schileyko (2014)), 5) tip of coxopleural process and a very narrow posterior area poreless (Fig. 6), 6) legs 1–20 (vs 1–18) with two tibial and one tarsal spur, leg 21 (vs 19) with tarsal spur only, leg 22 without spurs, and 7) all legs lacking accessory spines (though some rudiments recognizable at x85 magnification) vs legs 1–9 with minor accessory spines. Attems (1930: 259, 263) considered the lack of accessory spines as a diagnostic character for S. melanostoma . : Published as part of Schileyko, Arkady A. & Stoev, Pavel E., 2016, Scolopendromorpha of New Guinea and adjacent islands (Myriapoda, Chilopoda), pp. 247-280 in Zootaxa 4147 (3) on page 250, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4147.3.3, http://zenodo.org/record/264843 : {"references": ["Attems, C. (1930) Myriopoda. 2. Scolopendromorpha. Das Tierreich 54. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 1 - 308.", "Schileyko, A. (2014) A contribution to the centipede fauna of Venezuela (Chilopoda: Scolopendromorpha). Zootaxa, 3821 (1), 151 - 192. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 3821.2.1"]}
format Text
author Schileyko, Arkady A.
Stoev, Pavel E.
author_facet Schileyko, Arkady A.
Stoev, Pavel E.
author_sort Schileyko, Arkady A.
title Scolopocryptops melanostoma
title_short Scolopocryptops melanostoma
title_full Scolopocryptops melanostoma
title_fullStr Scolopocryptops melanostoma
title_full_unstemmed Scolopocryptops melanostoma
title_sort scolopocryptops melanostoma
publisher Zenodo
publishDate 2016
url https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3511087
https://zenodo.org/record/3511087
long_lat ENVELOPE(-59.515,-59.515,50.600,50.600)
ENVELOPE(-60.734,-60.734,-63.816,-63.816)
ENVELOPE(-55.615,-55.615,49.517,49.517)
ENVELOPE(-92.384,-92.384,76.602,76.602)
geographic Saint-Vincent
Trinidad
Triton
Triton Bay
geographic_facet Saint-Vincent
Trinidad
Triton
Triton Bay
genre Triton Bay
genre_facet Triton Bay
op_relation http://zenodo.org/record/264843
http://publication.plazi.org/id/FFC44A1F0E48B00DFFCBFF9EBC17FFF9
http://treatment.plazi.org/id/0392244DFF8D937EFF6BFF08FAFCFCAD
http://zoobank.org/6238B25B-787F-4F50-BFAE-03CD33D0F699
https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit
https://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4147.3.3
http://zenodo.org/record/264843
http://publication.plazi.org/id/FFC44A1F0E48B00DFFCBFF9EBC17FFF9
https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.264845
https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.264846
https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3507000
http://treatment.plazi.org/id/0392244DFF8D937EFF6BFF08FAFCFCAD
http://zoobank.org/6238B25B-787F-4F50-BFAE-03CD33D0F699
https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3511086
https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit
op_rights Open Access
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/legalcode
cc0-1.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
op_rightsnorm CC0
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3511087
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4147.3.3
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.264845
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.264846
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3507000
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3511086
_version_ 1766218370161573888
spelling ftdatacite:10.5281/zenodo.3511087 2023-05-15T18:33:43+02:00 Scolopocryptops melanostoma Schileyko, Arkady A. Stoev, Pavel E. 2016 https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3511087 https://zenodo.org/record/3511087 unknown Zenodo http://zenodo.org/record/264843 http://publication.plazi.org/id/FFC44A1F0E48B00DFFCBFF9EBC17FFF9 http://treatment.plazi.org/id/0392244DFF8D937EFF6BFF08FAFCFCAD http://zoobank.org/6238B25B-787F-4F50-BFAE-03CD33D0F699 https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit https://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4147.3.3 http://zenodo.org/record/264843 http://publication.plazi.org/id/FFC44A1F0E48B00DFFCBFF9EBC17FFF9 https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.264845 https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.264846 https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3507000 http://treatment.plazi.org/id/0392244DFF8D937EFF6BFF08FAFCFCAD http://zoobank.org/6238B25B-787F-4F50-BFAE-03CD33D0F699 https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3511086 https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit Open Access Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/legalcode cc0-1.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess CC0 Biodiversity Taxonomy Animalia Arthropoda Chilopoda Scolopendromorpha Scolopocryptopidae Scolopocryptops Scolopocryptops melanostoma article-journal ScholarlyArticle Text Taxonomic treatment 2016 ftdatacite https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3511087 https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4147.3.3 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.264845 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.264846 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3507000 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3511086 2022-03-10T12:09:25Z 1. Scolopocryptops melanostoma Newport, 1845 Figs 3–6 Otocryptops melanostomus : Attems, 1930: 263; Scolopocryptops melanostoma : Chagas, 2010: 164; Scolopocryptops melanostoma : Schileyko, 2014: 154. Material. E Indonesia, West Papua Province, S Bird’s Neck: 1 ad [spm 1, No. 7503], Kaimana 47 km E, Triton bay, environs Kamaka (former Warika) village, lake Kamakawalar, 03°45’33”S, 134°12’05”E, 90 m, primeval lowland rainforest on limestone, 09.09.2010, leg. M. Kalninsh; 1 ad [spm 2, No. 7504], Kaimana 7–9 km NW, 25– 200 m, primeval lowland rainforest on limestone, 05.09.2010, leg. DT; 1 ad [spm 3, СDT], Kaimana 40 km E, Triton bay, environs Lobo village, 03°45’00”S, 134°05’33”E, 700–900 m, primeval rainforest on limestone, 17.09.2010, leg. M. Kalninsh. Range. Mexico; Central America (Guatemala, Honduras, Costa Rica, Panama), Greater Antilles (Puerto Rico, Haiti), Lesser Antilles (Martinique, Saint Vincent and Grenadines, Trinidad); South America (Venezuela, Colombia, Ecuador, Peru, Brazil); Australasia (Fiji Islands), Indochina (Nicobar Island, Vietnam), Taiwan, Philippines, E Indonesia, Papua New Guinea. Remarks. Spiracles of spm 1 and 2 were filled up by white thin thread-like parasites, which are superficially similar to nematods (Fig. 3) and were loosely attached to the host and easy to remove. These parasites were missing in spm 3. Morphologically, the studied specimens fit well to the diagnosis of S. melanostoma as per Schileyko (2014), including also the presence of three longitudinal ridges at the mesal surface of forcipular tarsungula (see Fig. 2 in Schileyko (2014)) and basal transverse suture of process of forcipular trochanteroprefemur (Fig. 4; see also Fig. 3 in Schileyko (2014)). West Papuan specimens are considerably larger than those from Venezuela used for comparison (the type locality of this species is St.Vincent in Lesser Antilles, thus the Venezuelan material can reasonably be used as a reference). Furthermore, they differ from the latter also by the following features: 1) tergites with irregular patches of a dark pigment (Fig. 5), 2) 4 (vs. 6) basal antennomeres being glabrous, 3) pretarsus of maxillae 2 with one (upper) very short but well-developed and darkly sclerotized accessory spine (Fig. 4), 4) coxopleural process (Fig. 6) conical (triangular) and comparatively short (cylindrical, slender and nearly twice as long as sternite 23 in the examined Venezuelan specimen) (see Fig. 6 in Schileyko (2014)), 5) tip of coxopleural process and a very narrow posterior area poreless (Fig. 6), 6) legs 1–20 (vs 1–18) with two tibial and one tarsal spur, leg 21 (vs 19) with tarsal spur only, leg 22 without spurs, and 7) all legs lacking accessory spines (though some rudiments recognizable at x85 magnification) vs legs 1–9 with minor accessory spines. Attems (1930: 259, 263) considered the lack of accessory spines as a diagnostic character for S. melanostoma . : Published as part of Schileyko, Arkady A. & Stoev, Pavel E., 2016, Scolopendromorpha of New Guinea and adjacent islands (Myriapoda, Chilopoda), pp. 247-280 in Zootaxa 4147 (3) on page 250, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4147.3.3, http://zenodo.org/record/264843 : {"references": ["Attems, C. (1930) Myriopoda. 2. Scolopendromorpha. Das Tierreich 54. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 1 - 308.", "Schileyko, A. (2014) A contribution to the centipede fauna of Venezuela (Chilopoda: Scolopendromorpha). Zootaxa, 3821 (1), 151 - 192. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 3821.2.1"]} Text Triton Bay DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology) Saint-Vincent ENVELOPE(-59.515,-59.515,50.600,50.600) Trinidad ENVELOPE(-60.734,-60.734,-63.816,-63.816) Triton ENVELOPE(-55.615,-55.615,49.517,49.517) Triton Bay ENVELOPE(-92.384,-92.384,76.602,76.602)