Fig. 2. A in Host and geographic differences in prevalence and diversity of gastrointestinal helminths of foxes (Vulpes vulpes), coyotes (Canis latrans) and wolves (Canis lupus) in Quebec´, Canada ...

• Main Authors: Emilie, Bouchard, Schurer, Janna M., Kolapo, Temitope, Wagner, Brent, Mass, Ariane, e, Locke, Sean A., Leighton, Patrick, Jenkins, Emily J.
• Format: Still Image
• Language: unknown
• Published: Zenodo 2021
• Subjects: Biodiversity; Taxonomy; Canis lupus; Subarctic
• Online Access: https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13267636; https://zenodo.org/doi/10.5281/zenodo.13267636

Fig. 2. A) Parasite genus richness in foxes (Vulpes vulpes, blue), coyotes (Canis latrans, orange), and wolves (Canis lupus, gray) from Qu´ebec, Canada, determined by gross examination and fecal flotation combined (N = 250). Fewer foxes were uninfected than coyotes (p = 0.006). More foxes were infected by two parasite genera than coyotes (p = 0.004). B) Parasite genus richness between Subarctic (yellow) and Humid Continental climate (green) in foxes from Qu´ebec, Canada, determined by gross examination and fecal flotation combined (N = 155). No significant difference in parasite genera was seen in foxes between Subarctic and Humid Continental climate regions. Parasites counted in both histograms were: diphyllobothriids (likely Dibothriocephalus spp.), Echinococcus spp., Taenia spp., Capillaria spp., Toxascaris sp., Toxocara sp., Trichuris sp., Uncinaria sp., Alaria sp., Cryptocotyle sp., and Metorchis sp. Parasites observed in both fecal and gross examination were only counted once. Bars represent 95% ... : Published as part of Emilie, Bouchard, Schurer, Janna M., Kolapo, Temitope, Wagner, Brent, Mass, Ariane, e, Locke, Sean A., Leighton, Patrick & Jenkins, Emily J., 2021, Host and geographic differences in prevalence and diversity of gastrointestinal helminths of foxes (Vulpes vulpes), coyotes (Canis latrans) and wolves (Canis lupus) in Quebec´, Canada, pp. 126-137 in International Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and Wildlife 16 on page 132, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2021.09.002, http://zenodo.org/record/13267631 ...