Oil Recovery Study By Low Temperature Carbon Dioxide Injection In High-Pressure High-Temperature Micromodels

For the past decades, CO 2 flooding has been used as a successful method for enhanced oil recovery (EOR). However, high mobility ratio and fingering effect are considered as important drawbacka of this process. Low temperature injection of CO 2 into high temperature reservoirs may improve the oil re...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hamdi, Zakaria, Mariyamni Awang
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Zenodo 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1132624
https://zenodo.org/record/1132624
id ftdatacite:10.5281/zenodo.1132624
record_format openpolar
institution Open Polar
collection DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology)
op_collection_id ftdatacite
language English
topic Enhanced oil recovery
CO2 flooding
micromodel studies
miscible flooding.
spellingShingle Enhanced oil recovery
CO2 flooding
micromodel studies
miscible flooding.
Hamdi, Zakaria
Mariyamni Awang
Oil Recovery Study By Low Temperature Carbon Dioxide Injection In High-Pressure High-Temperature Micromodels
topic_facet Enhanced oil recovery
CO2 flooding
micromodel studies
miscible flooding.
description For the past decades, CO 2 flooding has been used as a successful method for enhanced oil recovery (EOR). However, high mobility ratio and fingering effect are considered as important drawbacka of this process. Low temperature injection of CO 2 into high temperature reservoirs may improve the oil recovery, but simulating multiphase flow in the non-isothermal medium is difficult, and commercial simulators are very unstable in these conditions. Furthermore, to best of authors’ knowledge, no experimental work was done to verify the results of the simulations and to understand the pore-scale process. In this paper, we present results of investigations on injection of low temperature CO 2 into a high-pressure high-temperature micromodel with injection temperature range from 34 to 75 °F. Effect of temperature and saturation changes of different fluids are measured in each case. The results prove the proposed method. The injection of CO 2 at low temperatures increased the oil recovery in high temperature reservoirs significantly. Also, CO 2 rich phases available in the high temperature system can affect the oil recovery through the better sweep of the oil which is initially caused by penetration of LCO 2 inside the system. Furthermore, no unfavorable effect was detected using this method. Low temperature CO 2 is proposed to be used as early as secondary recovery. : {"references": ["Z. Hamdi and M. Awang, \"Improving Oil Recovery by Cold CO2 Injection: A Simulation Study,\" International Journal of Petroleum and Geoscience Engineering (IJPGE), vol. 1, pp. 167-177, 30/09/2013 2013.", "Z. Hamdi, M. Bt. Awang, and B. Moradi, \"Low Temperature Carbon Dioxide Injection in High Temperature Oil Reservoirs,\" presented at the International Petroleum Technology Conference, 2014.", "J. R. Christensen, E. H. Stenby, and A. Skauge, \"Review of WAG Field Experience,\" SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, vol. 4, pp. 97-106, 04/01/2001 2001.", "S. Elgaghah, A. Y. Zekri, R. A. Almehaideb, and S. A. Shedid, \"Laboratory Investigation of Influences of Initial Oil Saturation and Oil Viscosity on Oil Recovery by CO2 Miscible Flooding,\" presented at the EUROPEC/EAGE Conference and Exhibition, London, U.K., 2007.", "S. Chen, H. Li, D. Yang, and P. Tontiwachwuthikul, \"Optimal Parametric Design for Water-Alternating-Gas (WAG) Process in a CO2-Miscible Flooding Reservoir,\" 2010/10/1/.", "A. Spivak, W. H. Garrison, and J. P. Nguyen, \"Review of an Immiscible CO2 Project, Tar Zone, Fault Block V, Wilmington Field, California,\" SPE Reservoir Engineering, vol. 5, pp. 155-162, 05/01/1990 1990.", "T. D. Ma and G. K. Youngren, \"Performance of Immiscible Water-Alternating-Gas (IWAG) Injection at Kuparuk River Unit, North Slope, Alaska.\"", "Z. Hamdi and M. Awang, \"CO2 Minimum Miscibility Pressure Determination of Pure Hydrocarbons in Different Temperatures Using Slimtube Simulations,\" Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, vol. 7, pp. 3159-3163, 2014.", "L. Minssieux, \"WAG Flow Mechanisms in Presence of Residual Oil\", Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi:10.2118/28623-MS, 1994\n[10]\tA. Y. Zekri and A. A. Natuh, \"Laboratory Study of the Effects of Miscible WAG Process on Tertiary Oil Recovery.\"\n[11]\tJ. R. Christensen, E. H. Stenby, and A. Skauge, \"Compositional and Relative Permeability Hysteresis Effects on Near-Miscible WAG.\"\n[12]\tJ. A. Larsen and A. Skauge, \"Simulation of the Immiscible WAG Process Using Cycle-Dependent Three-Phase Relative Permeabilities.\"\n[13]\tM. I. J. v. Dijke, M. Lorentzen, M. Sohrabi, and K. S. Sorbie, \"Pore-Scale Simulation of WAG Floods in Mixed-Wet Micromodels,\" SPE Journal, vol. 15, pp. pp. 238-247, 03/01/2010 2010.\n[14]\tM. Sohrabi, D. H. Tehrani, A. Danesh, and G. D. Henderson, \"Visualisation of Oil Recovery by Water Alternating Gas (WAG) Injection Using High Pressure Micromodels - Oil-Wet & Mixed-Wet Systems,\" presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, Louisiana, 2001.\n[15]\tc. c. a. K. Mattax, j.r., \"Ever see waterflood?,\" Oil & Gas Journal, vol. 59, 1961.\n[16]\tR. Lenormand, C. Zarcone, and A. Sarr, \"Mechanisms of the displacement of one fluid by another in a network of capillary ducts,\" Journal of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 135, pp. 337-353, 1983.\n[17]\tM. Blunt and P. King, \"Relative permeabilities from two- and three-dimensional pore-scale network modelling,\" Transport in Porous Media, vol. 6, pp. 407-433, 1991/08/01 1991.\n[18]\tJ. A. Billiotte, H. De Moegen, and P. Oren, \"Experimental Micromodeling and Numerical Simulation of Gas/Water Injection/Withdrawal Cycles as Applied to Underground Gas Storage,\" 1993/4/1/.\n[19]\tM. Sohrabi, G. D. Henderson, D. H. Tehrani, and A. Danesh, \"Visualisation of Oil Recovery by Water Alternating Gas (WAG) Injection Using High Pressure Micromodels - Water-Wet System,\" presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, Texas, 2000.\n[20]\tM. Sohrabi, D. H. Tehrani, A. Danesh, and G. D. Henderson, \"Visualization of Oil Recovery by Water-Alternating-Gas Injection Using High-Pressure Micromodels,\" SPE Journal, vol. 9, pp. 290-301, 09/01/2004 2004.\n[21]\tZ. Hamdi, M. Awang, & A. Zamani, \"Evaluating Liquid CO2 Injection Technique for Oil Recovery Using Core Flood Experiments\", Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi:10.2118/184092-MS, 2016.\n[22]\tS. G. Sayegh and D. B. Fisher, \"Enhanced Oil Recovery by CO2 Flooding in Homogeneous and Heterogeneous 2D Micromodels,\" Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, vol. 48, pp. 30-36, 08/01/2009 2009.\n[23]\tP. Y. Zhang, S. Huang, S. Sayegh, and X. L. Zhou, \"Effect of CO2 Impurities on Gas-Injection EOR Processes,\" 2004."]}
format Text
author Hamdi, Zakaria
Mariyamni Awang
author_facet Hamdi, Zakaria
Mariyamni Awang
author_sort Hamdi, Zakaria
title Oil Recovery Study By Low Temperature Carbon Dioxide Injection In High-Pressure High-Temperature Micromodels
title_short Oil Recovery Study By Low Temperature Carbon Dioxide Injection In High-Pressure High-Temperature Micromodels
title_full Oil Recovery Study By Low Temperature Carbon Dioxide Injection In High-Pressure High-Temperature Micromodels
title_fullStr Oil Recovery Study By Low Temperature Carbon Dioxide Injection In High-Pressure High-Temperature Micromodels
title_full_unstemmed Oil Recovery Study By Low Temperature Carbon Dioxide Injection In High-Pressure High-Temperature Micromodels
title_sort oil recovery study by low temperature carbon dioxide injection in high-pressure high-temperature micromodels
publisher Zenodo
publishDate 2017
url https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1132624
https://zenodo.org/record/1132624
long_lat ENVELOPE(47.867,47.867,-67.967,-67.967)
ENVELOPE(-60.667,-60.667,-63.950,-63.950)
geographic Christensen
Orleans
geographic_facet Christensen
Orleans
genre north slope
Alaska
genre_facet north slope
Alaska
op_relation https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1132625
op_rights Open Access
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
op_rightsnorm CC-BY
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1132624
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1132625
_version_ 1766141157906055168
spelling ftdatacite:10.5281/zenodo.1132624 2023-05-15T17:40:16+02:00 Oil Recovery Study By Low Temperature Carbon Dioxide Injection In High-Pressure High-Temperature Micromodels Hamdi, Zakaria Mariyamni Awang 2017 https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1132624 https://zenodo.org/record/1132624 en eng Zenodo https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1132625 Open Access Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess CC-BY Enhanced oil recovery CO2 flooding micromodel studies miscible flooding. Text Journal article article-journal ScholarlyArticle 2017 ftdatacite https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1132624 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1132625 2021-11-05T12:55:41Z For the past decades, CO 2 flooding has been used as a successful method for enhanced oil recovery (EOR). However, high mobility ratio and fingering effect are considered as important drawbacka of this process. Low temperature injection of CO 2 into high temperature reservoirs may improve the oil recovery, but simulating multiphase flow in the non-isothermal medium is difficult, and commercial simulators are very unstable in these conditions. Furthermore, to best of authors’ knowledge, no experimental work was done to verify the results of the simulations and to understand the pore-scale process. In this paper, we present results of investigations on injection of low temperature CO 2 into a high-pressure high-temperature micromodel with injection temperature range from 34 to 75 °F. Effect of temperature and saturation changes of different fluids are measured in each case. The results prove the proposed method. The injection of CO 2 at low temperatures increased the oil recovery in high temperature reservoirs significantly. Also, CO 2 rich phases available in the high temperature system can affect the oil recovery through the better sweep of the oil which is initially caused by penetration of LCO 2 inside the system. Furthermore, no unfavorable effect was detected using this method. Low temperature CO 2 is proposed to be used as early as secondary recovery. : {"references": ["Z. Hamdi and M. Awang, \"Improving Oil Recovery by Cold CO2 Injection: A Simulation Study,\" International Journal of Petroleum and Geoscience Engineering (IJPGE), vol. 1, pp. 167-177, 30/09/2013 2013.", "Z. Hamdi, M. Bt. Awang, and B. Moradi, \"Low Temperature Carbon Dioxide Injection in High Temperature Oil Reservoirs,\" presented at the International Petroleum Technology Conference, 2014.", "J. R. Christensen, E. H. Stenby, and A. Skauge, \"Review of WAG Field Experience,\" SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, vol. 4, pp. 97-106, 04/01/2001 2001.", "S. Elgaghah, A. Y. Zekri, R. A. Almehaideb, and S. A. Shedid, \"Laboratory Investigation of Influences of Initial Oil Saturation and Oil Viscosity on Oil Recovery by CO2 Miscible Flooding,\" presented at the EUROPEC/EAGE Conference and Exhibition, London, U.K., 2007.", "S. Chen, H. Li, D. Yang, and P. Tontiwachwuthikul, \"Optimal Parametric Design for Water-Alternating-Gas (WAG) Process in a CO2-Miscible Flooding Reservoir,\" 2010/10/1/.", "A. Spivak, W. H. Garrison, and J. P. Nguyen, \"Review of an Immiscible CO2 Project, Tar Zone, Fault Block V, Wilmington Field, California,\" SPE Reservoir Engineering, vol. 5, pp. 155-162, 05/01/1990 1990.", "T. D. Ma and G. K. Youngren, \"Performance of Immiscible Water-Alternating-Gas (IWAG) Injection at Kuparuk River Unit, North Slope, Alaska.\"", "Z. Hamdi and M. Awang, \"CO2 Minimum Miscibility Pressure Determination of Pure Hydrocarbons in Different Temperatures Using Slimtube Simulations,\" Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, vol. 7, pp. 3159-3163, 2014.", "L. Minssieux, \"WAG Flow Mechanisms in Presence of Residual Oil\", Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi:10.2118/28623-MS, 1994\n[10]\tA. Y. Zekri and A. A. Natuh, \"Laboratory Study of the Effects of Miscible WAG Process on Tertiary Oil Recovery.\"\n[11]\tJ. R. Christensen, E. H. Stenby, and A. Skauge, \"Compositional and Relative Permeability Hysteresis Effects on Near-Miscible WAG.\"\n[12]\tJ. A. Larsen and A. Skauge, \"Simulation of the Immiscible WAG Process Using Cycle-Dependent Three-Phase Relative Permeabilities.\"\n[13]\tM. I. J. v. Dijke, M. Lorentzen, M. Sohrabi, and K. S. Sorbie, \"Pore-Scale Simulation of WAG Floods in Mixed-Wet Micromodels,\" SPE Journal, vol. 15, pp. pp. 238-247, 03/01/2010 2010.\n[14]\tM. Sohrabi, D. H. Tehrani, A. Danesh, and G. D. Henderson, \"Visualisation of Oil Recovery by Water Alternating Gas (WAG) Injection Using High Pressure Micromodels - Oil-Wet & Mixed-Wet Systems,\" presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, Louisiana, 2001.\n[15]\tc. c. a. K. Mattax, j.r., \"Ever see waterflood?,\" Oil & Gas Journal, vol. 59, 1961.\n[16]\tR. Lenormand, C. Zarcone, and A. Sarr, \"Mechanisms of the displacement of one fluid by another in a network of capillary ducts,\" Journal of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 135, pp. 337-353, 1983.\n[17]\tM. Blunt and P. King, \"Relative permeabilities from two- and three-dimensional pore-scale network modelling,\" Transport in Porous Media, vol. 6, pp. 407-433, 1991/08/01 1991.\n[18]\tJ. A. Billiotte, H. De Moegen, and P. Oren, \"Experimental Micromodeling and Numerical Simulation of Gas/Water Injection/Withdrawal Cycles as Applied to Underground Gas Storage,\" 1993/4/1/.\n[19]\tM. Sohrabi, G. D. Henderson, D. H. Tehrani, and A. Danesh, \"Visualisation of Oil Recovery by Water Alternating Gas (WAG) Injection Using High Pressure Micromodels - Water-Wet System,\" presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, Texas, 2000.\n[20]\tM. Sohrabi, D. H. Tehrani, A. Danesh, and G. D. Henderson, \"Visualization of Oil Recovery by Water-Alternating-Gas Injection Using High-Pressure Micromodels,\" SPE Journal, vol. 9, pp. 290-301, 09/01/2004 2004.\n[21]\tZ. Hamdi, M. Awang, & A. Zamani, \"Evaluating Liquid CO2 Injection Technique for Oil Recovery Using Core Flood Experiments\", Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi:10.2118/184092-MS, 2016.\n[22]\tS. G. Sayegh and D. B. Fisher, \"Enhanced Oil Recovery by CO2 Flooding in Homogeneous and Heterogeneous 2D Micromodels,\" Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, vol. 48, pp. 30-36, 08/01/2009 2009.\n[23]\tP. Y. Zhang, S. Huang, S. Sayegh, and X. L. Zhou, \"Effect of CO2 Impurities on Gas-Injection EOR Processes,\" 2004."]} Text north slope Alaska DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology) Christensen ENVELOPE(47.867,47.867,-67.967,-67.967) Orleans ENVELOPE(-60.667,-60.667,-63.950,-63.950)