Mainland Scandinavian Object Shift And The Puzzling Ergative Pattern In Aleut

Eskimo-Aleut languages turn out to have the same two types of object shift that \citet{holmberg1986word} describes for Scandinavian. Specific objects move out of the VP in Inuit \citep{bittner1996ergativity} and I argue that object shift also occurs in Aleut, but it is limited to pronouns as in Main...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Woolford, Ellen
Format: Book Part
Language:unknown
Published: Zenodo 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1117744
https://zenodo.org/record/1117744
id ftdatacite:10.5281/zenodo.1117744
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdatacite:10.5281/zenodo.1117744 2023-05-15T13:14:11+02:00 Mainland Scandinavian Object Shift And The Puzzling Ergative Pattern In Aleut Woolford, Ellen 2017 https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1117744 https://zenodo.org/record/1117744 unknown Zenodo https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1117743 Open Access Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess CC-BY chapter Book section Text ScholarlyArticle 2017 ftdatacite https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1117744 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1117743 2021-11-05T12:55:41Z Eskimo-Aleut languages turn out to have the same two types of object shift that \citet{holmberg1986word} describes for Scandinavian. Specific objects move out of the VP in Inuit \citep{bittner1996ergativity} and I argue that object shift also occurs in Aleut, but it is limited to pronouns as in Mainland Scandinavian. Aleut differs from Mainland Scandinavian in that, for independent reasons, only third pronouns successfully undergo object shift. Shifting first and second person pronouns is blocked by PCC-like constraints on the portmanteau agreement that occurs in object shift constructions. Shifting reflexives is also blocked, because it would incur a violation of the Anaphor Agreement Effect. The surface pattern in Aleut has been described as one where ergative case marks the subject only when another argument in the clause is null. I argue that there is no direct cause and effect relationship between these. The key is the fact that pronouns that agree are not spelled out. Agreement correlates with ergative case because, as in Inuit, ergative case marks the subject in Aleut only when the object moves out of the VP, and in this situation, again as in Inuit, there is portmanteau agreement with the ergative subject and nominative object in object shift constructions. Like Inuit, Aleut has possessor raising/stranding so that the possessor of an object can undergo object shift, trigger agreement, and thus pro drop. From the English translations of Aleut sentences, it initially appears that null objects of prepositions also correlate with ergative subjects, but Aleut, like Inuit, has possessed relational nouns which function like prepositions if they take locative case. These also allow possessor raising and object shift, with the same consequences described above. Book Part aleut eskimo* Eskimo–Aleut inuit DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology)
institution Open Polar
collection DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology)
op_collection_id ftdatacite
language unknown
description Eskimo-Aleut languages turn out to have the same two types of object shift that \citet{holmberg1986word} describes for Scandinavian. Specific objects move out of the VP in Inuit \citep{bittner1996ergativity} and I argue that object shift also occurs in Aleut, but it is limited to pronouns as in Mainland Scandinavian. Aleut differs from Mainland Scandinavian in that, for independent reasons, only third pronouns successfully undergo object shift. Shifting first and second person pronouns is blocked by PCC-like constraints on the portmanteau agreement that occurs in object shift constructions. Shifting reflexives is also blocked, because it would incur a violation of the Anaphor Agreement Effect. The surface pattern in Aleut has been described as one where ergative case marks the subject only when another argument in the clause is null. I argue that there is no direct cause and effect relationship between these. The key is the fact that pronouns that agree are not spelled out. Agreement correlates with ergative case because, as in Inuit, ergative case marks the subject in Aleut only when the object moves out of the VP, and in this situation, again as in Inuit, there is portmanteau agreement with the ergative subject and nominative object in object shift constructions. Like Inuit, Aleut has possessor raising/stranding so that the possessor of an object can undergo object shift, trigger agreement, and thus pro drop. From the English translations of Aleut sentences, it initially appears that null objects of prepositions also correlate with ergative subjects, but Aleut, like Inuit, has possessed relational nouns which function like prepositions if they take locative case. These also allow possessor raising and object shift, with the same consequences described above.
format Book Part
author Woolford, Ellen
spellingShingle Woolford, Ellen
Mainland Scandinavian Object Shift And The Puzzling Ergative Pattern In Aleut
author_facet Woolford, Ellen
author_sort Woolford, Ellen
title Mainland Scandinavian Object Shift And The Puzzling Ergative Pattern In Aleut
title_short Mainland Scandinavian Object Shift And The Puzzling Ergative Pattern In Aleut
title_full Mainland Scandinavian Object Shift And The Puzzling Ergative Pattern In Aleut
title_fullStr Mainland Scandinavian Object Shift And The Puzzling Ergative Pattern In Aleut
title_full_unstemmed Mainland Scandinavian Object Shift And The Puzzling Ergative Pattern In Aleut
title_sort mainland scandinavian object shift and the puzzling ergative pattern in aleut
publisher Zenodo
publishDate 2017
url https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1117744
https://zenodo.org/record/1117744
genre aleut
eskimo*
Eskimo–Aleut
inuit
genre_facet aleut
eskimo*
Eskimo–Aleut
inuit
op_relation https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1117743
op_rights Open Access
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
op_rightsnorm CC-BY
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1117744
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1117743
_version_ 1766262465636597760