Effects Of Ground Motion Characteristics On Damage Of Rc Buildings: A Detailed Investigation

Damage status of RC buildings is greatly influenced by the characteristics of the imposed ground motion. Peak Ground Acceleration and frequency contents are considered the main two factors that affect ground motion characteristics; hence, affecting the seismic response of RC structures and consequen...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: M. Elassaly
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Zenodo 2015
Subjects:
PGA
Online Access:https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1106999
https://zenodo.org/record/1106999
Description
Summary:Damage status of RC buildings is greatly influenced by the characteristics of the imposed ground motion. Peak Ground Acceleration and frequency contents are considered the main two factors that affect ground motion characteristics; hence, affecting the seismic response of RC structures and consequently their damage state. A detailed investigation on the combined effects of these two factors on damage assessment of RC buildings is carried out. Twenty one earthquake records are analyzed and arranged into three groups, according to their frequency contents. These records are used in an investigation to define the expected damage state that would be attained by RC buildings, if subjected to varying ground motion characteristics. The damage assessment is conducted through examining drift ratios and damage indices of the overall structure and the significant structural components of RC building. Base and story shear of RC building model, are also investigated, for cases when the model is subjected to the chosen twenty one earthquake records. Nonlinear dynamic analyses are performed on a 2-dimensional model of a 12-story RC building. : {"references": ["A. S. Elnashai, \"A very brief history of earthquake engineering with\nemphasis on developments in and from the British Isles,\" Chaos,\nSolitons & Fractals, Volume 13, Issue 5, April 2002, Pages 967-972.", "A. S. Elnashai, \"Assessment of seismic vulnerability of structures,\"\nJournal of Constructional Steel Research, Volume 62, Issue 11,\nNovember 2006, Pages 1134-1147.", "S. El-Kholy, M. El-assaly, and M. Maher, \"Seismic vulnerability\nassessment of existing muti-story reinforced concrete buildings in\nEgypt,\" Arab J Sci Eng, 2012, 37:341\u2013355.", "M. El-assaly, M. Maher, and S. ElKholy, \"Seismic damage assessment\nof vertical irregular RC buildings: case study of setback buildings, 10th\nInternational Conference RASD, 12-14 July, Southhampton, U.K., 2010.", "M. El-assaly, \"Seismic Performance Assessment of vertical Irregular\nR.C. Buildings, for Various Ground Motion Characteristics,\" CSCE\n2012, 3rd International Structural Specialty Conference, Edmonton,\nAlberta, Canada, 2012.", "O. Kwon, and A. S. Elnashai, \"Probabilistic Seismic Assessment of\nStructure, Foundation, and Soil Interacting Systems,\" Mid-America\nEarthquake Center, 2007.", "A. Madan, and A. Hashmi, \"Analytical prediction of the seismic\nperformance of masonry infilled reinforced concrete frames subjected to\nnear-field earthquakes,\" J. Struct. Engrg., 2008, 134 (9), 1569 \u2013 81.", "M. Dolsek, and P. Fajfar, \"The effect of masonry infills on the seismic\nresponse of a four storey reinforced concrete frame-a probabilistic\nassessment,\" Engineering Structures, 2008, 30, 1991\u20132001.", "M. El-assaly, \"Effects of Frequency Content of Ground Motion on\nSeismic Response of Multistory Buildings,\" CSCE 2005, 33rd Annual\nGeneral Conference of the Canadian Society for Civil Engineering,\nToronto, Ontario, Canada, 2005.\n[10] M. Maher, S. ElKholy, and M. El-assaly, \"The effects of ground motion\ncharacteristics on the seismic fragility curves of R/C buildings, CSCE\n2009 Annual General Conference, St. John's, Newfoundland and\nLabrador, Canada, 2009.\n[11] T. Sawada, K. Hirao, H. Yamamoto, and O. Tsujihara, \"Relation\nbetween maximum amplitude ratio and spectral parameters of\nearthquake ground motion,\" Proceedings of 10th World Conference on\nEarthquake Engineering, Madrid, Spain, 1992, 2:617-622.\n[12] FEMA-356, Pre-standard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation\nof buildings, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington\n(DC), 2000.\n[13] IDARC2D, A Computer Program for Seismic Inelastic Structural\nAnalysis, Department of Civil, Structural and Environmental\nEngineering, University at Buffalo, New York,\nhttp://www.civil.eng.buffalo.edu/ idarc2d50/, 2006.\n[14] ECCS-201, Egyptian Code for Design and Construction of Concrete\nStructures, Ministry of Housing, Utilities and Urban Communities,\nCairo, Egypt, 2008.\n[15] Y. J. Park, and H-S. Ang, \"Mechanistic Seismic Damage model for\nReinforced Concrete,\" Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 1985,\n111(4), 722-739.\n[16] Y. J. Park, H-S. Ang, and Y.K. Wen, \"Damage-Limiting A seismic\nDesign of Buildings,\" Earthquake Spectra, 1987, 3(1), pp. 1\u201325.\n[17] PEER. Strong Motion Database, the Pacific Earthquake Engineering\nResearch Center and the University of California, Web site:\nhttp://www.peer.berkeley.edu/smcat/, 2000.\n[18] S. K. Kunnath, A. M. Reinhorn, and R. F. Lobo, , IDARC Version 3.0,\n\"A Program for the Inelastic Damage Analysis of Reinforced Concrete\nStructures,\" Technical Report NCEER 92-0022, NCEER, State\nUniversity of New York at Buffalo, 1992.\n[19] M. R. Tabeshpour, A. Bakhshi, and A. A. Golafshani, \"Seismic\nvulnerability, performance and damage analysis of special structures,\"\n13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Canada, 2004."]}