The Residual Effects Of Different Doses Of Atrazine+Alachlor And Foramsulfuron On The Growth And Physiology Of Rapeseed (Brassica Napus L.)

A pot experiment was carried out under controlled conditions to evaluate the residual effects of different doses of atrazine+alachlor and foramsulfuron used in corn fields on the growth and physiology of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). A split-plot experiment in CRD with 4 replications was used. The m...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: S. Peyvastegan, A. Farahbakhsh
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Zenodo 2011
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1082444
https://zenodo.org/record/1082444
id ftdatacite:10.5281/zenodo.1082444
record_format openpolar
institution Open Polar
collection DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology)
op_collection_id ftdatacite
language English
topic Atrazine+alachlor
foramsulfuron
rapeseed
residual
spellingShingle Atrazine+alachlor
foramsulfuron
rapeseed
residual
S. Peyvastegan
A. Farahbakhsh
The Residual Effects Of Different Doses Of Atrazine+Alachlor And Foramsulfuron On The Growth And Physiology Of Rapeseed (Brassica Napus L.)
topic_facet Atrazine+alachlor
foramsulfuron
rapeseed
residual
description A pot experiment was carried out under controlled conditions to evaluate the residual effects of different doses of atrazine+alachlor and foramsulfuron used in corn fields on the growth and physiology of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). A split-plot experiment in CRD with 4 replications was used. The main plots consisted of herbicide type (atrazine+alachlor mixture and foramsulfuron) and the sub-plots were different residual doses of the herbicides (0, 1%, 5%, 10%, 20%, 40%, 50% and 100%). 7 cm diameter pots were filled with a virgin soil and seeds of rapeseed cv. Hayola were planted in them. The pots were kept under controlled conditions for 8 weeks after germination. At harvest, the growth parameters and the chlorophyll contents of the leaves were determined. The results showed that the growth of rapeseed plants was completely prevented at the highest residual doses of the herbicides (50 and 100 %). The growth parameters of rapeseed plants were affected by all doses of both types of the herbicide as compared to the controls. The residual effects of atrazine+alachlor mixture in reducing the growth parameters of rapeseed were more pronounced as compared to the residual effects of foramsulfuron alone. : {"references": ["J. R. Moyer, \"Sulfonylurea herbicide effects on following crops.\" Weed\nTechnol, vol. 9, pp. 373-379, 1995.", "H. J. Strek, \"The Science of DuPont-s soil residual herbicides in Canada.\nPages 31-44 in R. C. Van Acker, ed. Soil Residual Herbicides: Science\nand Management.\" Topics in Can. Weed Sci, Vol. 3, Saint-Anne-de-\nBellevue, Quebec: Can. Weed Sci. Soc. 2005.", "I.O. Akobundu, \"Weed Science in the Tropics: Principles and Practices.\"\nWiley, New York, 1987. 522pp.", "G.E. Lebedeva, V.L. Agapov, Yu. N. Blagoveshchensky, V.P.\nSamsonova, \"Gerbitsidi i Pochva: Ekologicheskie Aspeckty Primineniia\nGerbitsidov.\" Izdatel-stvo Moskoskova Universiteta, 1990, 208pp.", "J. A. Ivany,\"Chlorsulfuron use in barley and residual effect on potato\nand rutabaga grown in rotation.\" Can. J. Plant. Sci, vol. 67, pp. 337-\n341, 1987.", "E. Hernandez-Sevillano, M. Villarroya, J. L. Alonso-Prados, and J. M.\nGarcia-Baudin, \"Bioassay to detect MON-37500 and triasulfuron\nresidues in soils.\" Weed Technol, vol. 15, pp. 447-452. 2001.", "R. G. Greenland, \" Injury to vegetable crops from herbicides applied in\nprevious years.\" Weed Technol, vol. 17, pp. 73-78, 2003.", "K. S. Goh, S. J. Richman, J. Troiano, \"ELISA of simazine in soil:\napplications for field leaching study.\" Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol,\nvol. 48, pp.554-560, 1992.\n[10] A. Rahman, T. K. James, and P. Gunter, \"Bioassays of soil applied\nherbicides.\" Proc. Int. Symp. Indian Soc. Weed Sci. 1993, no.1, pp. 95-\n106.\n[11] L. Stalderand, W. Pestemer, \" Availability to plants of herbicide\nresidues in soil.\" Part I: a rapid method for estimating potentially\navailable residues of herbicides. Weed Res, vol. 20, pp. 341-347, 1980\n[12] K. L. Hollaway, R. S. Kookana, D. J. McQuinn, M. R. Moerkerk, D. M.\nNoy, and M. A. Smal, \"Comparison of sulfonylurea herbicide residue\ndetection in soil by bioassay enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and\nHPLC.\" Weed Res, vol. 39, pp. 383-397, 1999.\n[13] W. Pestemer, L. Stalder, and B. Eckert. \"Availability to plants of\nherbicide residues in soil.\" Part II: data for use in vegetable crop\nrotations, Weed Res, vol. 20, pp. 349-353, 1980.\n[14] M. Horowitz,\"Application of bioassay techniques to herbicide\ninvestigations.\" Weed Res, Vol. 16, pp. 209-215, 197.\n[15] R. A. Shimabuku, H. C. Ratsch, C. M. Wise, J. U. Nwosu, and L. A.\nKapustka, \"A new plant life cycle bioassay for assessment of the effects\nof toxic chemicals using rapid cycling brassica.\" In J. W. Gorsuch, W.\nR. Lower, W. Wang, and M. A. Lewis, eds. Plants for Toxicity\nAssessment: Second Volume, ASTM STP 1115. Philadelphia, PA:\nAmerican Society for Testing and Materials,1991, pp. 365-375.\n[16] P.R. Stork, \"Bioefficacy and leaching of controlled-release formulations\nof triazine herbicides.\" Weed Res, vol. 38, pp. 433-441, 1998.\n[17] J. C. Streibig, \" Models for curve-fitting herbicide dose response data.\"\nActa Agric. Scand, vol. 30, pp. 59-64, 1980.\n[18] A. Walker, G.G. Briggs, M.P. Greaves, R.J. Hance, and A.R.\nThompson, \" Herbicides in Soil: \" In: Roberts, H.A. (Ed), Weed Control\nHandbook: Principles. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, 1982,\n533pp.\n[19] J. O-Sullivan, R. J. Thomas, and W. J. Bouw. \"Effect of imazethapyr\nand imazamox soil residues on several vegetable crops grown in\nOntario.\" Can. J. Plant Sci, vol. 4. pp. 647-651, 1998.\n[20] J. C. Streibig, A. Walker, A. M. Blaier, \"Variability of bioassays\nwith metsulfuron-methyl in soil.\" Weed Res, vol.35, pp. 215-224, 1995."]}
format Text
author S. Peyvastegan
A. Farahbakhsh
author_facet S. Peyvastegan
A. Farahbakhsh
author_sort S. Peyvastegan
title The Residual Effects Of Different Doses Of Atrazine+Alachlor And Foramsulfuron On The Growth And Physiology Of Rapeseed (Brassica Napus L.)
title_short The Residual Effects Of Different Doses Of Atrazine+Alachlor And Foramsulfuron On The Growth And Physiology Of Rapeseed (Brassica Napus L.)
title_full The Residual Effects Of Different Doses Of Atrazine+Alachlor And Foramsulfuron On The Growth And Physiology Of Rapeseed (Brassica Napus L.)
title_fullStr The Residual Effects Of Different Doses Of Atrazine+Alachlor And Foramsulfuron On The Growth And Physiology Of Rapeseed (Brassica Napus L.)
title_full_unstemmed The Residual Effects Of Different Doses Of Atrazine+Alachlor And Foramsulfuron On The Growth And Physiology Of Rapeseed (Brassica Napus L.)
title_sort residual effects of different doses of atrazine+alachlor and foramsulfuron on the growth and physiology of rapeseed (brassica napus l.)
publisher Zenodo
publishDate 2011
url https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1082444
https://zenodo.org/record/1082444
long_lat ENVELOPE(-67.017,-67.017,-68.833,-68.833)
ENVELOPE(-63.017,-63.017,-64.517,-64.517)
ENVELOPE(-66.511,-66.511,-68.993,-68.993)
ENVELOPE(-62.167,-62.167,-74.500,-74.500)
ENVELOPE(62.083,62.083,-73.383,-73.383)
ENVELOPE(-63.817,-63.817,-69.650,-69.650)
geographic Baudin
Briggs
Canada
Greenland
Gunter
Hernandez
Indian
Lebedeva
Sullivan
geographic_facet Baudin
Briggs
Canada
Greenland
Gunter
Hernandez
Indian
Lebedeva
Sullivan
genre Greenland
genre_facet Greenland
op_relation https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1082445
op_rights Open Access
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
op_rightsnorm CC-BY
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1082444
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1082445
_version_ 1766020549842042880
spelling ftdatacite:10.5281/zenodo.1082444 2023-05-15T16:30:48+02:00 The Residual Effects Of Different Doses Of Atrazine+Alachlor And Foramsulfuron On The Growth And Physiology Of Rapeseed (Brassica Napus L.) S. Peyvastegan A. Farahbakhsh 2011 https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1082444 https://zenodo.org/record/1082444 en eng Zenodo https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1082445 Open Access Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess CC-BY Atrazine+alachlor foramsulfuron rapeseed residual Text Journal article article-journal ScholarlyArticle 2011 ftdatacite https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1082444 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1082445 2021-11-05T12:55:41Z A pot experiment was carried out under controlled conditions to evaluate the residual effects of different doses of atrazine+alachlor and foramsulfuron used in corn fields on the growth and physiology of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). A split-plot experiment in CRD with 4 replications was used. The main plots consisted of herbicide type (atrazine+alachlor mixture and foramsulfuron) and the sub-plots were different residual doses of the herbicides (0, 1%, 5%, 10%, 20%, 40%, 50% and 100%). 7 cm diameter pots were filled with a virgin soil and seeds of rapeseed cv. Hayola were planted in them. The pots were kept under controlled conditions for 8 weeks after germination. At harvest, the growth parameters and the chlorophyll contents of the leaves were determined. The results showed that the growth of rapeseed plants was completely prevented at the highest residual doses of the herbicides (50 and 100 %). The growth parameters of rapeseed plants were affected by all doses of both types of the herbicide as compared to the controls. The residual effects of atrazine+alachlor mixture in reducing the growth parameters of rapeseed were more pronounced as compared to the residual effects of foramsulfuron alone. : {"references": ["J. R. Moyer, \"Sulfonylurea herbicide effects on following crops.\" Weed\nTechnol, vol. 9, pp. 373-379, 1995.", "H. J. Strek, \"The Science of DuPont-s soil residual herbicides in Canada.\nPages 31-44 in R. C. Van Acker, ed. Soil Residual Herbicides: Science\nand Management.\" Topics in Can. Weed Sci, Vol. 3, Saint-Anne-de-\nBellevue, Quebec: Can. Weed Sci. Soc. 2005.", "I.O. Akobundu, \"Weed Science in the Tropics: Principles and Practices.\"\nWiley, New York, 1987. 522pp.", "G.E. Lebedeva, V.L. Agapov, Yu. N. Blagoveshchensky, V.P.\nSamsonova, \"Gerbitsidi i Pochva: Ekologicheskie Aspeckty Primineniia\nGerbitsidov.\" Izdatel-stvo Moskoskova Universiteta, 1990, 208pp.", "J. A. Ivany,\"Chlorsulfuron use in barley and residual effect on potato\nand rutabaga grown in rotation.\" Can. J. Plant. Sci, vol. 67, pp. 337-\n341, 1987.", "E. Hernandez-Sevillano, M. Villarroya, J. L. Alonso-Prados, and J. M.\nGarcia-Baudin, \"Bioassay to detect MON-37500 and triasulfuron\nresidues in soils.\" Weed Technol, vol. 15, pp. 447-452. 2001.", "R. G. Greenland, \" Injury to vegetable crops from herbicides applied in\nprevious years.\" Weed Technol, vol. 17, pp. 73-78, 2003.", "K. S. Goh, S. J. Richman, J. Troiano, \"ELISA of simazine in soil:\napplications for field leaching study.\" Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol,\nvol. 48, pp.554-560, 1992.\n[10] A. Rahman, T. K. James, and P. Gunter, \"Bioassays of soil applied\nherbicides.\" Proc. Int. Symp. Indian Soc. Weed Sci. 1993, no.1, pp. 95-\n106.\n[11] L. Stalderand, W. Pestemer, \" Availability to plants of herbicide\nresidues in soil.\" Part I: a rapid method for estimating potentially\navailable residues of herbicides. Weed Res, vol. 20, pp. 341-347, 1980\n[12] K. L. Hollaway, R. S. Kookana, D. J. McQuinn, M. R. Moerkerk, D. M.\nNoy, and M. A. Smal, \"Comparison of sulfonylurea herbicide residue\ndetection in soil by bioassay enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and\nHPLC.\" Weed Res, vol. 39, pp. 383-397, 1999.\n[13] W. Pestemer, L. Stalder, and B. Eckert. \"Availability to plants of\nherbicide residues in soil.\" Part II: data for use in vegetable crop\nrotations, Weed Res, vol. 20, pp. 349-353, 1980.\n[14] M. Horowitz,\"Application of bioassay techniques to herbicide\ninvestigations.\" Weed Res, Vol. 16, pp. 209-215, 197.\n[15] R. A. Shimabuku, H. C. Ratsch, C. M. Wise, J. U. Nwosu, and L. A.\nKapustka, \"A new plant life cycle bioassay for assessment of the effects\nof toxic chemicals using rapid cycling brassica.\" In J. W. Gorsuch, W.\nR. Lower, W. Wang, and M. A. Lewis, eds. Plants for Toxicity\nAssessment: Second Volume, ASTM STP 1115. Philadelphia, PA:\nAmerican Society for Testing and Materials,1991, pp. 365-375.\n[16] P.R. Stork, \"Bioefficacy and leaching of controlled-release formulations\nof triazine herbicides.\" Weed Res, vol. 38, pp. 433-441, 1998.\n[17] J. C. Streibig, \" Models for curve-fitting herbicide dose response data.\"\nActa Agric. Scand, vol. 30, pp. 59-64, 1980.\n[18] A. Walker, G.G. Briggs, M.P. Greaves, R.J. Hance, and A.R.\nThompson, \" Herbicides in Soil: \" In: Roberts, H.A. (Ed), Weed Control\nHandbook: Principles. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, 1982,\n533pp.\n[19] J. O-Sullivan, R. J. Thomas, and W. J. Bouw. \"Effect of imazethapyr\nand imazamox soil residues on several vegetable crops grown in\nOntario.\" Can. J. Plant Sci, vol. 4. pp. 647-651, 1998.\n[20] J. C. Streibig, A. Walker, A. M. Blaier, \"Variability of bioassays\nwith metsulfuron-methyl in soil.\" Weed Res, vol.35, pp. 215-224, 1995."]} Text Greenland DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology) Baudin ENVELOPE(-67.017,-67.017,-68.833,-68.833) Briggs ENVELOPE(-63.017,-63.017,-64.517,-64.517) Canada Greenland Gunter ENVELOPE(-66.511,-66.511,-68.993,-68.993) Hernandez ENVELOPE(-62.167,-62.167,-74.500,-74.500) Indian Lebedeva ENVELOPE(62.083,62.083,-73.383,-73.383) Sullivan ENVELOPE(-63.817,-63.817,-69.650,-69.650)