The Residual Effects Of Different Doses Of Atrazine+Alachlor And Foramsulfuron On The Growth And Physiology Of Rapeseed (Brassica Napus L.)
A pot experiment was carried out under controlled conditions to evaluate the residual effects of different doses of atrazine+alachlor and foramsulfuron used in corn fields on the growth and physiology of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). A split-plot experiment in CRD with 4 replications was used. The m...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Zenodo
2011
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1082444 https://zenodo.org/record/1082444 |
id |
ftdatacite:10.5281/zenodo.1082444 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology) |
op_collection_id |
ftdatacite |
language |
English |
topic |
Atrazine+alachlor foramsulfuron rapeseed residual |
spellingShingle |
Atrazine+alachlor foramsulfuron rapeseed residual S. Peyvastegan A. Farahbakhsh The Residual Effects Of Different Doses Of Atrazine+Alachlor And Foramsulfuron On The Growth And Physiology Of Rapeseed (Brassica Napus L.) |
topic_facet |
Atrazine+alachlor foramsulfuron rapeseed residual |
description |
A pot experiment was carried out under controlled conditions to evaluate the residual effects of different doses of atrazine+alachlor and foramsulfuron used in corn fields on the growth and physiology of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). A split-plot experiment in CRD with 4 replications was used. The main plots consisted of herbicide type (atrazine+alachlor mixture and foramsulfuron) and the sub-plots were different residual doses of the herbicides (0, 1%, 5%, 10%, 20%, 40%, 50% and 100%). 7 cm diameter pots were filled with a virgin soil and seeds of rapeseed cv. Hayola were planted in them. The pots were kept under controlled conditions for 8 weeks after germination. At harvest, the growth parameters and the chlorophyll contents of the leaves were determined. The results showed that the growth of rapeseed plants was completely prevented at the highest residual doses of the herbicides (50 and 100 %). The growth parameters of rapeseed plants were affected by all doses of both types of the herbicide as compared to the controls. The residual effects of atrazine+alachlor mixture in reducing the growth parameters of rapeseed were more pronounced as compared to the residual effects of foramsulfuron alone. : {"references": ["J. R. Moyer, \"Sulfonylurea herbicide effects on following crops.\" Weed\nTechnol, vol. 9, pp. 373-379, 1995.", "H. J. Strek, \"The Science of DuPont-s soil residual herbicides in Canada.\nPages 31-44 in R. C. Van Acker, ed. Soil Residual Herbicides: Science\nand Management.\" Topics in Can. Weed Sci, Vol. 3, Saint-Anne-de-\nBellevue, Quebec: Can. Weed Sci. Soc. 2005.", "I.O. Akobundu, \"Weed Science in the Tropics: Principles and Practices.\"\nWiley, New York, 1987. 522pp.", "G.E. Lebedeva, V.L. Agapov, Yu. N. Blagoveshchensky, V.P.\nSamsonova, \"Gerbitsidi i Pochva: Ekologicheskie Aspeckty Primineniia\nGerbitsidov.\" Izdatel-stvo Moskoskova Universiteta, 1990, 208pp.", "J. A. Ivany,\"Chlorsulfuron use in barley and residual effect on potato\nand rutabaga grown in rotation.\" Can. J. Plant. Sci, vol. 67, pp. 337-\n341, 1987.", "E. Hernandez-Sevillano, M. Villarroya, J. L. Alonso-Prados, and J. M.\nGarcia-Baudin, \"Bioassay to detect MON-37500 and triasulfuron\nresidues in soils.\" Weed Technol, vol. 15, pp. 447-452. 2001.", "R. G. Greenland, \" Injury to vegetable crops from herbicides applied in\nprevious years.\" Weed Technol, vol. 17, pp. 73-78, 2003.", "K. S. Goh, S. J. Richman, J. Troiano, \"ELISA of simazine in soil:\napplications for field leaching study.\" Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol,\nvol. 48, pp.554-560, 1992.\n[10] A. Rahman, T. K. James, and P. Gunter, \"Bioassays of soil applied\nherbicides.\" Proc. Int. Symp. Indian Soc. Weed Sci. 1993, no.1, pp. 95-\n106.\n[11] L. Stalderand, W. Pestemer, \" Availability to plants of herbicide\nresidues in soil.\" Part I: a rapid method for estimating potentially\navailable residues of herbicides. Weed Res, vol. 20, pp. 341-347, 1980\n[12] K. L. Hollaway, R. S. Kookana, D. J. McQuinn, M. R. Moerkerk, D. M.\nNoy, and M. A. Smal, \"Comparison of sulfonylurea herbicide residue\ndetection in soil by bioassay enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and\nHPLC.\" Weed Res, vol. 39, pp. 383-397, 1999.\n[13] W. Pestemer, L. Stalder, and B. Eckert. \"Availability to plants of\nherbicide residues in soil.\" Part II: data for use in vegetable crop\nrotations, Weed Res, vol. 20, pp. 349-353, 1980.\n[14] M. Horowitz,\"Application of bioassay techniques to herbicide\ninvestigations.\" Weed Res, Vol. 16, pp. 209-215, 197.\n[15] R. A. Shimabuku, H. C. Ratsch, C. M. Wise, J. U. Nwosu, and L. A.\nKapustka, \"A new plant life cycle bioassay for assessment of the effects\nof toxic chemicals using rapid cycling brassica.\" In J. W. Gorsuch, W.\nR. Lower, W. Wang, and M. A. Lewis, eds. Plants for Toxicity\nAssessment: Second Volume, ASTM STP 1115. Philadelphia, PA:\nAmerican Society for Testing and Materials,1991, pp. 365-375.\n[16] P.R. Stork, \"Bioefficacy and leaching of controlled-release formulations\nof triazine herbicides.\" Weed Res, vol. 38, pp. 433-441, 1998.\n[17] J. C. Streibig, \" Models for curve-fitting herbicide dose response data.\"\nActa Agric. Scand, vol. 30, pp. 59-64, 1980.\n[18] A. Walker, G.G. Briggs, M.P. Greaves, R.J. Hance, and A.R.\nThompson, \" Herbicides in Soil: \" In: Roberts, H.A. (Ed), Weed Control\nHandbook: Principles. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, 1982,\n533pp.\n[19] J. O-Sullivan, R. J. Thomas, and W. J. Bouw. \"Effect of imazethapyr\nand imazamox soil residues on several vegetable crops grown in\nOntario.\" Can. J. Plant Sci, vol. 4. pp. 647-651, 1998.\n[20] J. C. Streibig, A. Walker, A. M. Blaier, \"Variability of bioassays\nwith metsulfuron-methyl in soil.\" Weed Res, vol.35, pp. 215-224, 1995."]} |
format |
Text |
author |
S. Peyvastegan A. Farahbakhsh |
author_facet |
S. Peyvastegan A. Farahbakhsh |
author_sort |
S. Peyvastegan |
title |
The Residual Effects Of Different Doses Of Atrazine+Alachlor And Foramsulfuron On The Growth And Physiology Of Rapeseed (Brassica Napus L.) |
title_short |
The Residual Effects Of Different Doses Of Atrazine+Alachlor And Foramsulfuron On The Growth And Physiology Of Rapeseed (Brassica Napus L.) |
title_full |
The Residual Effects Of Different Doses Of Atrazine+Alachlor And Foramsulfuron On The Growth And Physiology Of Rapeseed (Brassica Napus L.) |
title_fullStr |
The Residual Effects Of Different Doses Of Atrazine+Alachlor And Foramsulfuron On The Growth And Physiology Of Rapeseed (Brassica Napus L.) |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Residual Effects Of Different Doses Of Atrazine+Alachlor And Foramsulfuron On The Growth And Physiology Of Rapeseed (Brassica Napus L.) |
title_sort |
residual effects of different doses of atrazine+alachlor and foramsulfuron on the growth and physiology of rapeseed (brassica napus l.) |
publisher |
Zenodo |
publishDate |
2011 |
url |
https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1082444 https://zenodo.org/record/1082444 |
long_lat |
ENVELOPE(-67.017,-67.017,-68.833,-68.833) ENVELOPE(-63.017,-63.017,-64.517,-64.517) ENVELOPE(-66.511,-66.511,-68.993,-68.993) ENVELOPE(-62.167,-62.167,-74.500,-74.500) ENVELOPE(62.083,62.083,-73.383,-73.383) ENVELOPE(-63.817,-63.817,-69.650,-69.650) |
geographic |
Baudin Briggs Canada Greenland Gunter Hernandez Indian Lebedeva Sullivan |
geographic_facet |
Baudin Briggs Canada Greenland Gunter Hernandez Indian Lebedeva Sullivan |
genre |
Greenland |
genre_facet |
Greenland |
op_relation |
https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1082445 |
op_rights |
Open Access Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
op_rightsnorm |
CC-BY |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1082444 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1082445 |
_version_ |
1766020549842042880 |
spelling |
ftdatacite:10.5281/zenodo.1082444 2023-05-15T16:30:48+02:00 The Residual Effects Of Different Doses Of Atrazine+Alachlor And Foramsulfuron On The Growth And Physiology Of Rapeseed (Brassica Napus L.) S. Peyvastegan A. Farahbakhsh 2011 https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1082444 https://zenodo.org/record/1082444 en eng Zenodo https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1082445 Open Access Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess CC-BY Atrazine+alachlor foramsulfuron rapeseed residual Text Journal article article-journal ScholarlyArticle 2011 ftdatacite https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1082444 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1082445 2021-11-05T12:55:41Z A pot experiment was carried out under controlled conditions to evaluate the residual effects of different doses of atrazine+alachlor and foramsulfuron used in corn fields on the growth and physiology of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). A split-plot experiment in CRD with 4 replications was used. The main plots consisted of herbicide type (atrazine+alachlor mixture and foramsulfuron) and the sub-plots were different residual doses of the herbicides (0, 1%, 5%, 10%, 20%, 40%, 50% and 100%). 7 cm diameter pots were filled with a virgin soil and seeds of rapeseed cv. Hayola were planted in them. The pots were kept under controlled conditions for 8 weeks after germination. At harvest, the growth parameters and the chlorophyll contents of the leaves were determined. The results showed that the growth of rapeseed plants was completely prevented at the highest residual doses of the herbicides (50 and 100 %). The growth parameters of rapeseed plants were affected by all doses of both types of the herbicide as compared to the controls. The residual effects of atrazine+alachlor mixture in reducing the growth parameters of rapeseed were more pronounced as compared to the residual effects of foramsulfuron alone. : {"references": ["J. R. Moyer, \"Sulfonylurea herbicide effects on following crops.\" Weed\nTechnol, vol. 9, pp. 373-379, 1995.", "H. J. Strek, \"The Science of DuPont-s soil residual herbicides in Canada.\nPages 31-44 in R. C. Van Acker, ed. Soil Residual Herbicides: Science\nand Management.\" Topics in Can. Weed Sci, Vol. 3, Saint-Anne-de-\nBellevue, Quebec: Can. Weed Sci. Soc. 2005.", "I.O. Akobundu, \"Weed Science in the Tropics: Principles and Practices.\"\nWiley, New York, 1987. 522pp.", "G.E. Lebedeva, V.L. Agapov, Yu. N. Blagoveshchensky, V.P.\nSamsonova, \"Gerbitsidi i Pochva: Ekologicheskie Aspeckty Primineniia\nGerbitsidov.\" Izdatel-stvo Moskoskova Universiteta, 1990, 208pp.", "J. A. Ivany,\"Chlorsulfuron use in barley and residual effect on potato\nand rutabaga grown in rotation.\" Can. J. Plant. Sci, vol. 67, pp. 337-\n341, 1987.", "E. Hernandez-Sevillano, M. Villarroya, J. L. Alonso-Prados, and J. M.\nGarcia-Baudin, \"Bioassay to detect MON-37500 and triasulfuron\nresidues in soils.\" Weed Technol, vol. 15, pp. 447-452. 2001.", "R. G. Greenland, \" Injury to vegetable crops from herbicides applied in\nprevious years.\" Weed Technol, vol. 17, pp. 73-78, 2003.", "K. S. Goh, S. J. Richman, J. Troiano, \"ELISA of simazine in soil:\napplications for field leaching study.\" Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol,\nvol. 48, pp.554-560, 1992.\n[10] A. Rahman, T. K. James, and P. Gunter, \"Bioassays of soil applied\nherbicides.\" Proc. Int. Symp. Indian Soc. Weed Sci. 1993, no.1, pp. 95-\n106.\n[11] L. Stalderand, W. Pestemer, \" Availability to plants of herbicide\nresidues in soil.\" Part I: a rapid method for estimating potentially\navailable residues of herbicides. Weed Res, vol. 20, pp. 341-347, 1980\n[12] K. L. Hollaway, R. S. Kookana, D. J. McQuinn, M. R. Moerkerk, D. M.\nNoy, and M. A. Smal, \"Comparison of sulfonylurea herbicide residue\ndetection in soil by bioassay enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and\nHPLC.\" Weed Res, vol. 39, pp. 383-397, 1999.\n[13] W. Pestemer, L. Stalder, and B. Eckert. \"Availability to plants of\nherbicide residues in soil.\" Part II: data for use in vegetable crop\nrotations, Weed Res, vol. 20, pp. 349-353, 1980.\n[14] M. Horowitz,\"Application of bioassay techniques to herbicide\ninvestigations.\" Weed Res, Vol. 16, pp. 209-215, 197.\n[15] R. A. Shimabuku, H. C. Ratsch, C. M. Wise, J. U. Nwosu, and L. A.\nKapustka, \"A new plant life cycle bioassay for assessment of the effects\nof toxic chemicals using rapid cycling brassica.\" In J. W. Gorsuch, W.\nR. Lower, W. Wang, and M. A. Lewis, eds. Plants for Toxicity\nAssessment: Second Volume, ASTM STP 1115. Philadelphia, PA:\nAmerican Society for Testing and Materials,1991, pp. 365-375.\n[16] P.R. Stork, \"Bioefficacy and leaching of controlled-release formulations\nof triazine herbicides.\" Weed Res, vol. 38, pp. 433-441, 1998.\n[17] J. C. Streibig, \" Models for curve-fitting herbicide dose response data.\"\nActa Agric. Scand, vol. 30, pp. 59-64, 1980.\n[18] A. Walker, G.G. Briggs, M.P. Greaves, R.J. Hance, and A.R.\nThompson, \" Herbicides in Soil: \" In: Roberts, H.A. (Ed), Weed Control\nHandbook: Principles. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, 1982,\n533pp.\n[19] J. O-Sullivan, R. J. Thomas, and W. J. Bouw. \"Effect of imazethapyr\nand imazamox soil residues on several vegetable crops grown in\nOntario.\" Can. J. Plant Sci, vol. 4. pp. 647-651, 1998.\n[20] J. C. Streibig, A. Walker, A. M. Blaier, \"Variability of bioassays\nwith metsulfuron-methyl in soil.\" Weed Res, vol.35, pp. 215-224, 1995."]} Text Greenland DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology) Baudin ENVELOPE(-67.017,-67.017,-68.833,-68.833) Briggs ENVELOPE(-63.017,-63.017,-64.517,-64.517) Canada Greenland Gunter ENVELOPE(-66.511,-66.511,-68.993,-68.993) Hernandez ENVELOPE(-62.167,-62.167,-74.500,-74.500) Indian Lebedeva ENVELOPE(62.083,62.083,-73.383,-73.383) Sullivan ENVELOPE(-63.817,-63.817,-69.650,-69.650) |