USGS Barnegat Bay Hydrodynamic Model for March-September 2012

Simulation of hydrodynamic circulation in Barnegat Bay for the period from 03-01-2012 to 10-01-2012. The bathymetry of the model was based on the National Ocean Service Hydrographic Survey data, and updated with recent bathymetric measurements. At the landward end (western boundary), we specified po...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Defne, Zafer, Ganju, Neil Kamal
Format: Dataset
Language:unknown
Published: U.S. Geological Survey 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dx.doi.org/10.5066/f7sb44qs
https://www.sciencebase.gov/catalog/item/59f8af92e4b063d5d309f043
id ftdatacite:10.5066/f7sb44qs
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdatacite:10.5066/f7sb44qs 2023-05-15T17:35:12+02:00 USGS Barnegat Bay Hydrodynamic Model for March-September 2012 Defne, Zafer Ganju, Neil Kamal 2018 https://dx.doi.org/10.5066/f7sb44qs https://www.sciencebase.gov/catalog/item/59f8af92e4b063d5d309f043 unknown U.S. Geological Survey https://dx.doi.org/10.3133/cir1460 https://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2019jc015238 dataset Dataset 2018 ftdatacite https://doi.org/10.5066/f7sb44qs https://doi.org/10.3133/cir1460 https://doi.org/10.1029/2019jc015238 2021-11-05T12:55:41Z Simulation of hydrodynamic circulation in Barnegat Bay for the period from 03-01-2012 to 10-01-2012. The bathymetry of the model was based on the National Ocean Service Hydrographic Survey data, and updated with recent bathymetric measurements. At the landward end (western boundary), we specified point sources of freshwater in accordance with USGS streamflow measurements at 7 gauges, and a radiation boundary condition that allows tidal energy to propagate landward. On the seaward end, tidal water level and velocity amplitudes from the ADCIRC tidal database for the North Atlantic were applied. These were supplemented by the subtidal water level and subtidal barotropic velocity from the ESPreSSO model, which covers the Mid-Atlantic Bight at 6-kilometer resolution. At the ocean boundary, a combination of Chapman, Flather, and gradient boundary conditions were used. Salinity and temperature was also supplied by the ESPreSSO model. A radiation condition with nudging on a 6-hour timescale for tracers allowed for relaxation of the model solution relative to the forcing data, which prevented sharp gradients at the seaward boundary and subsequent oscillations in the solution. We applied meteorological forcing from North American Mesoscale Model at the ocean-atmosphere interface. The bulk flux parameterization routine was used with 3-hour wind velocity, air pressure, long and shortwave radiation, relative humidity, and rain inputs. For more details on the model set up see Defne and Ganju, 2015. Reference cited: Defne, Zafer, and Ganju, N.K., 2015, Quantifying the residence time and flushing characteristics of a shallow, back-barrier estuaryApplication of hydrodynamic and particle tracking models: Estuaries and Coasts, v. 38, issue 5, p. 1719-1734. [Also available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-014-9885-3.] Dataset North Atlantic DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology)
institution Open Polar
collection DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology)
op_collection_id ftdatacite
language unknown
description Simulation of hydrodynamic circulation in Barnegat Bay for the period from 03-01-2012 to 10-01-2012. The bathymetry of the model was based on the National Ocean Service Hydrographic Survey data, and updated with recent bathymetric measurements. At the landward end (western boundary), we specified point sources of freshwater in accordance with USGS streamflow measurements at 7 gauges, and a radiation boundary condition that allows tidal energy to propagate landward. On the seaward end, tidal water level and velocity amplitudes from the ADCIRC tidal database for the North Atlantic were applied. These were supplemented by the subtidal water level and subtidal barotropic velocity from the ESPreSSO model, which covers the Mid-Atlantic Bight at 6-kilometer resolution. At the ocean boundary, a combination of Chapman, Flather, and gradient boundary conditions were used. Salinity and temperature was also supplied by the ESPreSSO model. A radiation condition with nudging on a 6-hour timescale for tracers allowed for relaxation of the model solution relative to the forcing data, which prevented sharp gradients at the seaward boundary and subsequent oscillations in the solution. We applied meteorological forcing from North American Mesoscale Model at the ocean-atmosphere interface. The bulk flux parameterization routine was used with 3-hour wind velocity, air pressure, long and shortwave radiation, relative humidity, and rain inputs. For more details on the model set up see Defne and Ganju, 2015. Reference cited: Defne, Zafer, and Ganju, N.K., 2015, Quantifying the residence time and flushing characteristics of a shallow, back-barrier estuaryApplication of hydrodynamic and particle tracking models: Estuaries and Coasts, v. 38, issue 5, p. 1719-1734. [Also available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-014-9885-3.]
format Dataset
author Defne, Zafer
Ganju, Neil Kamal
spellingShingle Defne, Zafer
Ganju, Neil Kamal
USGS Barnegat Bay Hydrodynamic Model for March-September 2012
author_facet Defne, Zafer
Ganju, Neil Kamal
author_sort Defne, Zafer
title USGS Barnegat Bay Hydrodynamic Model for March-September 2012
title_short USGS Barnegat Bay Hydrodynamic Model for March-September 2012
title_full USGS Barnegat Bay Hydrodynamic Model for March-September 2012
title_fullStr USGS Barnegat Bay Hydrodynamic Model for March-September 2012
title_full_unstemmed USGS Barnegat Bay Hydrodynamic Model for March-September 2012
title_sort usgs barnegat bay hydrodynamic model for march-september 2012
publisher U.S. Geological Survey
publishDate 2018
url https://dx.doi.org/10.5066/f7sb44qs
https://www.sciencebase.gov/catalog/item/59f8af92e4b063d5d309f043
genre North Atlantic
genre_facet North Atlantic
op_relation https://dx.doi.org/10.3133/cir1460
https://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2019jc015238
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5066/f7sb44qs
https://doi.org/10.3133/cir1460
https://doi.org/10.1029/2019jc015238
_version_ 1766134281422241792