Male-biased sexual selection, but not sexual dichromatism, predicts speciation in birds

Sexual selection is thought to shape phylogenetic diversity by affecting speciation or extinction rates. However, the net effect of sexual selection on diversification is hard to predict, because many of the hypothesised effects on speciation or extinction have opposing signs and uncertain magnitude...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cally, Justin, Stuart-Fox, Devi, Holman, Luke, Dale, James, Medina, Iliana
Format: Dataset
Language:English
Published: Dryad 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dx.doi.org/10.5061/dryad.573n5tb6n
http://datadryad.org/stash/dataset/doi:10.5061/dryad.573n5tb6n
id ftdatacite:10.5061/dryad.573n5tb6n
record_format openpolar
institution Open Polar
collection DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology)
op_collection_id ftdatacite
language English
topic Selection - Sexual
FOS Biological sciences
spellingShingle Selection - Sexual
FOS Biological sciences
Cally, Justin
Stuart-Fox, Devi
Holman, Luke
Dale, James
Medina, Iliana
Male-biased sexual selection, but not sexual dichromatism, predicts speciation in birds
topic_facet Selection - Sexual
FOS Biological sciences
description Sexual selection is thought to shape phylogenetic diversity by affecting speciation or extinction rates. However, the net effect of sexual selection on diversification is hard to predict, because many of the hypothesised effects on speciation or extinction have opposing signs and uncertain magnitudes. Theoretical work also suggests that the net effect of sexual selection on diversification should depend strongly on ecological factors, though this prediction has seldom been tested. Here, we test whether variation in sexual selection can predict speciation and extinction rates across passerine birds (up to 5,812 species, covering most genera) and whether this relationship is mediated by environmental factors. Male-biased sexual selection, and specifically sexual size dimorphism, predicted two of the three measures of speciation rates that we examined. The link we observed between sexual selection and speciation was independent of environmental variability, though species with smaller ranges had higher speciation rates. There was no association between any proxies of sexual selection and extinction rate. Our findings support the view that male-biased sexual selection, as measured by frequent predictors of male-male competition, has shaped diversification in the largest radiation of birds. : We obtained estimates of species range size using expert range maps (BirdLife International and Handbook of the Birds of the World 2017). The names of 1,230 species in the Birdlife database (Hoyo and Collar 2016) have been recently changed, so we manually matched these taxa with the names used in the sexual dichromatism dataset (Hoyo and Collar 2016). For each species’ range, we obtained estimates of climatic conditions by extracting 1,000 random point samples of each bioclimatic variable. We extracted 19 present-day bioclimatic variables (representing a variety of biologically relevant annual trends in temperature and precipitation) with 30-second (~1 km2) spatial resolution (Fick and Hijmans 2017). From the 1000 values of each bioclimatic variable, we obtained means and standard deviations for each species. Using the same spatial sampling, we extracted means and standard deviations of bioclimatic variables from the paleoclimate during the last interglacial (LIG; 120,000 - 140,000 years ago) (Otto-Bliesner et al. 2006). To estimate variability in the energy available to species, we obtained the mean and standard deviation of net primary productivity (NPP) values between 2000 - 2015 across each species distribution. Estimates of NPP had 30-second resolution and were obtained through MODIS (Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer) primary production products stage 3 (MOD17A3) (Zhao et al. 2005). References BirdLife International and Handbook of the Birds of the World. 2017. Bird species distribution maps of the world. http://datazone.birdlife.org/species/requestdis. Fick, S. E., and R. J. Hijmans. 2017. WorldClim 2: New 1-km spatial resolution climate surfaces for global land areas. International Journal of Climatology 37:4302–4315. Hoyo, J. del, and N. J. Collar. 2016. HBW and birdlife international illustrated checklist of the birds of the world. Lynx Edicions; BirdLife International. Otto-Bliesner, B. L., S. J. Marshall, J. T. Overpeck, G. H. Miller, A. Hu, and. 2006. Simulating arctic climate warmth and icefield retreat in the last interglaciation. Science 311:1751–1753. Zhao, M., F. A. Heinsch, R. R. Nemani, and S. W. Running. 2005. Improvements of the modis terrestrial gross and net primary production global data set. Remote Sensing of Environment 95:164–176. : The data, with relevant code relating to its usage and analysis is available on Github: https://github.com/JustinCally/SexualSelection_Speciation
format Dataset
author Cally, Justin
Stuart-Fox, Devi
Holman, Luke
Dale, James
Medina, Iliana
author_facet Cally, Justin
Stuart-Fox, Devi
Holman, Luke
Dale, James
Medina, Iliana
author_sort Cally, Justin
title Male-biased sexual selection, but not sexual dichromatism, predicts speciation in birds
title_short Male-biased sexual selection, but not sexual dichromatism, predicts speciation in birds
title_full Male-biased sexual selection, but not sexual dichromatism, predicts speciation in birds
title_fullStr Male-biased sexual selection, but not sexual dichromatism, predicts speciation in birds
title_full_unstemmed Male-biased sexual selection, but not sexual dichromatism, predicts speciation in birds
title_sort male-biased sexual selection, but not sexual dichromatism, predicts speciation in birds
publisher Dryad
publishDate 2021
url https://dx.doi.org/10.5061/dryad.573n5tb6n
http://datadryad.org/stash/dataset/doi:10.5061/dryad.573n5tb6n
long_lat ENVELOPE(-132.245,-132.245,53.209,53.209)
geographic Arctic
Random Point
geographic_facet Arctic
Random Point
genre Arctic
Lynx
genre_facet Arctic
Lynx
op_rights Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/legalcode
cc0-1.0
op_rightsnorm CC0
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.573n5tb6n
_version_ 1766350115394551808
spelling ftdatacite:10.5061/dryad.573n5tb6n 2023-05-15T15:19:54+02:00 Male-biased sexual selection, but not sexual dichromatism, predicts speciation in birds Cally, Justin Stuart-Fox, Devi Holman, Luke Dale, James Medina, Iliana 2021 https://dx.doi.org/10.5061/dryad.573n5tb6n http://datadryad.org/stash/dataset/doi:10.5061/dryad.573n5tb6n en eng Dryad Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/legalcode cc0-1.0 CC0 Selection - Sexual FOS Biological sciences dataset Dataset 2021 ftdatacite https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.573n5tb6n 2022-02-08T13:02:41Z Sexual selection is thought to shape phylogenetic diversity by affecting speciation or extinction rates. However, the net effect of sexual selection on diversification is hard to predict, because many of the hypothesised effects on speciation or extinction have opposing signs and uncertain magnitudes. Theoretical work also suggests that the net effect of sexual selection on diversification should depend strongly on ecological factors, though this prediction has seldom been tested. Here, we test whether variation in sexual selection can predict speciation and extinction rates across passerine birds (up to 5,812 species, covering most genera) and whether this relationship is mediated by environmental factors. Male-biased sexual selection, and specifically sexual size dimorphism, predicted two of the three measures of speciation rates that we examined. The link we observed between sexual selection and speciation was independent of environmental variability, though species with smaller ranges had higher speciation rates. There was no association between any proxies of sexual selection and extinction rate. Our findings support the view that male-biased sexual selection, as measured by frequent predictors of male-male competition, has shaped diversification in the largest radiation of birds. : We obtained estimates of species range size using expert range maps (BirdLife International and Handbook of the Birds of the World 2017). The names of 1,230 species in the Birdlife database (Hoyo and Collar 2016) have been recently changed, so we manually matched these taxa with the names used in the sexual dichromatism dataset (Hoyo and Collar 2016). For each species’ range, we obtained estimates of climatic conditions by extracting 1,000 random point samples of each bioclimatic variable. We extracted 19 present-day bioclimatic variables (representing a variety of biologically relevant annual trends in temperature and precipitation) with 30-second (~1 km2) spatial resolution (Fick and Hijmans 2017). From the 1000 values of each bioclimatic variable, we obtained means and standard deviations for each species. Using the same spatial sampling, we extracted means and standard deviations of bioclimatic variables from the paleoclimate during the last interglacial (LIG; 120,000 - 140,000 years ago) (Otto-Bliesner et al. 2006). To estimate variability in the energy available to species, we obtained the mean and standard deviation of net primary productivity (NPP) values between 2000 - 2015 across each species distribution. Estimates of NPP had 30-second resolution and were obtained through MODIS (Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer) primary production products stage 3 (MOD17A3) (Zhao et al. 2005). References BirdLife International and Handbook of the Birds of the World. 2017. Bird species distribution maps of the world. http://datazone.birdlife.org/species/requestdis. Fick, S. E., and R. J. Hijmans. 2017. WorldClim 2: New 1-km spatial resolution climate surfaces for global land areas. International Journal of Climatology 37:4302–4315. Hoyo, J. del, and N. J. Collar. 2016. HBW and birdlife international illustrated checklist of the birds of the world. Lynx Edicions; BirdLife International. Otto-Bliesner, B. L., S. J. Marshall, J. T. Overpeck, G. H. Miller, A. Hu, and. 2006. Simulating arctic climate warmth and icefield retreat in the last interglaciation. Science 311:1751–1753. Zhao, M., F. A. Heinsch, R. R. Nemani, and S. W. Running. 2005. Improvements of the modis terrestrial gross and net primary production global data set. Remote Sensing of Environment 95:164–176. : The data, with relevant code relating to its usage and analysis is available on Github: https://github.com/JustinCally/SexualSelection_Speciation Dataset Arctic Lynx DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology) Arctic Random Point ENVELOPE(-132.245,-132.245,53.209,53.209)