Comparison of EISCAT Radar Data on Space Debris with Model Prediction by the MASTER Model of ESA

In the effort to obtain low cost routine space debris observations in low Earth orbit, ESA plans to utilise the radar facilities of the European Incoherent Scatter Scientific Association. First demonstration measurements were performed from 11 to 23 February 2001. In total $16{\rm hours}$ of radar s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Landgraf, M., Jehn, R., Flury, W.
Format: Text
Language:unknown
Published: arXiv 2003
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dx.doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.astro-ph/0301200
https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0301200
id ftdatacite:10.48550/arxiv.astro-ph/0301200
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdatacite:10.48550/arxiv.astro-ph/0301200 2023-05-15T16:04:44+02:00 Comparison of EISCAT Radar Data on Space Debris with Model Prediction by the MASTER Model of ESA Landgraf, M. Jehn, R. Flury, W. 2003 https://dx.doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.astro-ph/0301200 https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0301200 unknown arXiv https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2003.01.007 Assumed arXiv.org perpetual, non-exclusive license to distribute this article for submissions made before January 2004 http://arxiv.org/licenses/assumed-1991-2003/ Astrophysics astro-ph FOS Physical sciences article-journal Article ScholarlyArticle Text 2003 ftdatacite https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.astro-ph/0301200 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2003.01.007 2022-04-01T16:40:46Z In the effort to obtain low cost routine space debris observations in low Earth orbit, ESA plans to utilise the radar facilities of the European Incoherent Scatter Scientific Association. First demonstration measurements were performed from 11 to 23 February 2001. In total $16{\rm hours}$ of radar signals were collected. Here we compare these initial measurements with the predictions of the ESA MASTER/PROOF'99 model in order to assess the sensitivity as well as the reliability of the data. We find that while the determination of object size needs to be reviewed, the altitude distribution provides a good fit to the model prediction. The absolute number of objects detected in the various altitude bins indicates that the coherent integration method indeed increases the detection sensitivity when compared to incoherent integration. In the data presented here integration times from 0.1 to $0.3{\rm s}$ were used. As expected, orbit information cannot be obtained from the measurements if they are linked to ionospheric measurements as planned. In addition routine space debris observations provide also useful information for the validation of large-object catalogues. : 6 pages, 6 figures, uses LaTeX2e and cospar.sty, to appear in Advances in Space Research, available on http://www.mpi-hd.mpg.de/galileo/~landgraf Text EISCAT DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology)
institution Open Polar
collection DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology)
op_collection_id ftdatacite
language unknown
topic Astrophysics astro-ph
FOS Physical sciences
spellingShingle Astrophysics astro-ph
FOS Physical sciences
Landgraf, M.
Jehn, R.
Flury, W.
Comparison of EISCAT Radar Data on Space Debris with Model Prediction by the MASTER Model of ESA
topic_facet Astrophysics astro-ph
FOS Physical sciences
description In the effort to obtain low cost routine space debris observations in low Earth orbit, ESA plans to utilise the radar facilities of the European Incoherent Scatter Scientific Association. First demonstration measurements were performed from 11 to 23 February 2001. In total $16{\rm hours}$ of radar signals were collected. Here we compare these initial measurements with the predictions of the ESA MASTER/PROOF'99 model in order to assess the sensitivity as well as the reliability of the data. We find that while the determination of object size needs to be reviewed, the altitude distribution provides a good fit to the model prediction. The absolute number of objects detected in the various altitude bins indicates that the coherent integration method indeed increases the detection sensitivity when compared to incoherent integration. In the data presented here integration times from 0.1 to $0.3{\rm s}$ were used. As expected, orbit information cannot be obtained from the measurements if they are linked to ionospheric measurements as planned. In addition routine space debris observations provide also useful information for the validation of large-object catalogues. : 6 pages, 6 figures, uses LaTeX2e and cospar.sty, to appear in Advances in Space Research, available on http://www.mpi-hd.mpg.de/galileo/~landgraf
format Text
author Landgraf, M.
Jehn, R.
Flury, W.
author_facet Landgraf, M.
Jehn, R.
Flury, W.
author_sort Landgraf, M.
title Comparison of EISCAT Radar Data on Space Debris with Model Prediction by the MASTER Model of ESA
title_short Comparison of EISCAT Radar Data on Space Debris with Model Prediction by the MASTER Model of ESA
title_full Comparison of EISCAT Radar Data on Space Debris with Model Prediction by the MASTER Model of ESA
title_fullStr Comparison of EISCAT Radar Data on Space Debris with Model Prediction by the MASTER Model of ESA
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of EISCAT Radar Data on Space Debris with Model Prediction by the MASTER Model of ESA
title_sort comparison of eiscat radar data on space debris with model prediction by the master model of esa
publisher arXiv
publishDate 2003
url https://dx.doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.astro-ph/0301200
https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0301200
genre EISCAT
genre_facet EISCAT
op_relation https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2003.01.007
op_rights Assumed arXiv.org perpetual, non-exclusive license to distribute this article for submissions made before January 2004
http://arxiv.org/licenses/assumed-1991-2003/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.astro-ph/0301200
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2003.01.007
_version_ 1766400367133720576