A Unified Framework for Generalized Low-Shot Medical Image Segmentation with Scarce Data

• Main Authors: Cui, Hengji, Wei, Dong, Ma, Kai, Gu, Shi, Zheng, Yefeng
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: unknown
• Published: arXiv 2021
• Subjects: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition cs.CV; FOS Computer and information sciences; DML
• Online Access: https://dx.doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2110.09260; https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.09260

Medical image segmentation has achieved remarkable advancements using deep neural networks (DNNs). However, DNNs often need big amounts of data and annotations for training, both of which can be difficult and costly to obtain. In this work, we propose a unified framework for generalized low-shot (one- and few-shot) medical image segmentation based on distance metric learning (DML). Unlike most existing methods which only deal with the lack of annotations while assuming abundance of data, our framework works with extreme scarcity of both, which is ideal for rare diseases. Via DML, the framework learns a multimodal mixture representation for each category, and performs dense predictions based on cosine distances between the pixels' deep embeddings and the category representations. The multimodal representations effectively utilize the inter-subject similarities and intraclass variations to overcome overfitting due to extremely limited data. In addition, we propose adaptive mixing coefficients for the multimodal mixture distributions to adaptively emphasize the modes better suited to the current input. The representations are implicitly embedded as weights of the fc layer, such that the cosine distances can be computed efficiently via forward propagation. In our experiments on brain MRI and abdominal CT datasets, the proposed framework achieves superior performances for low-shot segmentation towards standard DNN-based (3D U-Net) and classical registration-based (ANTs) methods, e.g., achieving mean Dice coefficients of 81%/69% for brain tissue/abdominal multiorgan segmentation using a single training sample, as compared to 52%/31% and 72%/35% by the U-Net and ANTs, respectively. : Published in IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING