Hybrid parametric/smooth inversion of electrical resistivity tomography data

The standard smooth electrical resistivity tomography inversion produces an estimate of subsurface conductivity that has blurred boundaries, damped magnitudes, and often contains inversion artifacts. In many problems the expected conductivity structure is well constrained in some parts of the subsur...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Herring, Teddi, Heagy, Lindsey J., Pidlisecky, Adam, Cey, Edwin
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: arXiv 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dx.doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2107.10354
https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.10354
id ftdatacite:10.48550/arxiv.2107.10354
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdatacite:10.48550/arxiv.2107.10354 2023-05-15T17:57:52+02:00 Hybrid parametric/smooth inversion of electrical resistivity tomography data Herring, Teddi Heagy, Lindsey J. Pidlisecky, Adam Cey, Edwin 2021 https://dx.doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2107.10354 https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.10354 unknown arXiv https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2021.104986 Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode cc-by-4.0 CC-BY Geophysics physics.geo-ph FOS Physical sciences article-journal Article ScholarlyArticle Text 2021 ftdatacite https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2107.10354 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2021.104986 2022-03-10T14:06:23Z The standard smooth electrical resistivity tomography inversion produces an estimate of subsurface conductivity that has blurred boundaries, damped magnitudes, and often contains inversion artifacts. In many problems the expected conductivity structure is well constrained in some parts of the subsurface, but incorporating prior information in the inversion is not a trivial task. In this study we developed an electrical resistivity tomography inversion algorithm that combines parametric and smooth inversion strategies. In regions where the subsurface is well constrained, the model was parameterized with only a few variables, while the rest of the subsurface was parameterized with voxels. We tested this hybrid inversion strategy on two synthetic models that contained a well constrained highly resistive or conductive near-surface horizontal layer and a target beneath. In each testing scenario, the hybrid inversion improved resolution of feature boundaries and magnitudes and had fewer inversion artifacts than the standard smooth inversion. A sensitivity analysis showed that the hybrid inversion successfully recovered subsurface features when a range of regularization parameters, initial models, and data noise levels were tested. The hybrid inversion strategy can potentially be expanded to a range of applications including marine surveys, permafrost/frozen ground studies, urban geophysics, or anywhere that prior information allows part of the model to be constrained with simple geometric shapes. Article in Journal/Newspaper permafrost DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology)
institution Open Polar
collection DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology)
op_collection_id ftdatacite
language unknown
topic Geophysics physics.geo-ph
FOS Physical sciences
spellingShingle Geophysics physics.geo-ph
FOS Physical sciences
Herring, Teddi
Heagy, Lindsey J.
Pidlisecky, Adam
Cey, Edwin
Hybrid parametric/smooth inversion of electrical resistivity tomography data
topic_facet Geophysics physics.geo-ph
FOS Physical sciences
description The standard smooth electrical resistivity tomography inversion produces an estimate of subsurface conductivity that has blurred boundaries, damped magnitudes, and often contains inversion artifacts. In many problems the expected conductivity structure is well constrained in some parts of the subsurface, but incorporating prior information in the inversion is not a trivial task. In this study we developed an electrical resistivity tomography inversion algorithm that combines parametric and smooth inversion strategies. In regions where the subsurface is well constrained, the model was parameterized with only a few variables, while the rest of the subsurface was parameterized with voxels. We tested this hybrid inversion strategy on two synthetic models that contained a well constrained highly resistive or conductive near-surface horizontal layer and a target beneath. In each testing scenario, the hybrid inversion improved resolution of feature boundaries and magnitudes and had fewer inversion artifacts than the standard smooth inversion. A sensitivity analysis showed that the hybrid inversion successfully recovered subsurface features when a range of regularization parameters, initial models, and data noise levels were tested. The hybrid inversion strategy can potentially be expanded to a range of applications including marine surveys, permafrost/frozen ground studies, urban geophysics, or anywhere that prior information allows part of the model to be constrained with simple geometric shapes.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Herring, Teddi
Heagy, Lindsey J.
Pidlisecky, Adam
Cey, Edwin
author_facet Herring, Teddi
Heagy, Lindsey J.
Pidlisecky, Adam
Cey, Edwin
author_sort Herring, Teddi
title Hybrid parametric/smooth inversion of electrical resistivity tomography data
title_short Hybrid parametric/smooth inversion of electrical resistivity tomography data
title_full Hybrid parametric/smooth inversion of electrical resistivity tomography data
title_fullStr Hybrid parametric/smooth inversion of electrical resistivity tomography data
title_full_unstemmed Hybrid parametric/smooth inversion of electrical resistivity tomography data
title_sort hybrid parametric/smooth inversion of electrical resistivity tomography data
publisher arXiv
publishDate 2021
url https://dx.doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2107.10354
https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.10354
genre permafrost
genre_facet permafrost
op_relation https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2021.104986
op_rights Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
cc-by-4.0
op_rightsnorm CC-BY
op_doi https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2107.10354
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2021.104986
_version_ 1766166378612523008