Variance propagation for density surface models

Spatially-explicit estimates of population density, together with appropriate estimates of uncertainty, are required in many management contexts. Density Surface Models (DSMs) are a two-stage approach for estimating spatially-varying density from distance-sampling data. First, detection probabilitie...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bravington, Mark V, Miller, David L, Hedley, Sharon L
Format: Text
Language:unknown
Published: arXiv 2018
Subjects:
Gam
Online Access:https://dx.doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1807.07996
https://arxiv.org/abs/1807.07996
id ftdatacite:10.48550/arxiv.1807.07996
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdatacite:10.48550/arxiv.1807.07996 2023-05-15T16:33:26+02:00 Variance propagation for density surface models Bravington, Mark V Miller, David L Hedley, Sharon L 2018 https://dx.doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1807.07996 https://arxiv.org/abs/1807.07996 unknown arXiv https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13253-021-00438-2 arXiv.org perpetual, non-exclusive license http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ Methodology stat.ME FOS Computer and information sciences article-journal Article ScholarlyArticle Text 2018 ftdatacite https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1807.07996 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13253-021-00438-2 2022-04-01T09:34:13Z Spatially-explicit estimates of population density, together with appropriate estimates of uncertainty, are required in many management contexts. Density Surface Models (DSMs) are a two-stage approach for estimating spatially-varying density from distance-sampling data. First, detection probabilities -- perhaps depending on covariates -- are estimated based on details of individual encounters; next, local densities are estimated using a GAM, by fitting local encounter rates to location and/or spatially-varying covariates while allowing for the estimated detectabilities. One criticism of DSMs has been that uncertainty from the two stages is not usually propagated correctly into the final variance estimates. We show how to reformulate a DSM so that the uncertainty in detection probability from the distance sampling stage (regardless of its complexity) is captured as an extra random effect in the GAM stage. In effect, we refit an approximation to the detection function model at the same time as fitting the spatial model. This allows straightforward computation of the overall variance via exactly the same software already needed to fit the GAM. A further extension allows for spatial variation in group size, which can be an important covariate for detectability as well as directly affecting abundance. We illustrate these models using point transect survey data of Island Scrub-Jays on Santa Cruz Island, CA and harbour porpoise from the SCANS-II line transect survey of European waters. : 38 pages (incl. supp. mat.), 5 figures Text Harbour porpoise DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology) Gam ENVELOPE(-57.955,-57.955,-61.923,-61.923)
institution Open Polar
collection DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology)
op_collection_id ftdatacite
language unknown
topic Methodology stat.ME
FOS Computer and information sciences
spellingShingle Methodology stat.ME
FOS Computer and information sciences
Bravington, Mark V
Miller, David L
Hedley, Sharon L
Variance propagation for density surface models
topic_facet Methodology stat.ME
FOS Computer and information sciences
description Spatially-explicit estimates of population density, together with appropriate estimates of uncertainty, are required in many management contexts. Density Surface Models (DSMs) are a two-stage approach for estimating spatially-varying density from distance-sampling data. First, detection probabilities -- perhaps depending on covariates -- are estimated based on details of individual encounters; next, local densities are estimated using a GAM, by fitting local encounter rates to location and/or spatially-varying covariates while allowing for the estimated detectabilities. One criticism of DSMs has been that uncertainty from the two stages is not usually propagated correctly into the final variance estimates. We show how to reformulate a DSM so that the uncertainty in detection probability from the distance sampling stage (regardless of its complexity) is captured as an extra random effect in the GAM stage. In effect, we refit an approximation to the detection function model at the same time as fitting the spatial model. This allows straightforward computation of the overall variance via exactly the same software already needed to fit the GAM. A further extension allows for spatial variation in group size, which can be an important covariate for detectability as well as directly affecting abundance. We illustrate these models using point transect survey data of Island Scrub-Jays on Santa Cruz Island, CA and harbour porpoise from the SCANS-II line transect survey of European waters. : 38 pages (incl. supp. mat.), 5 figures
format Text
author Bravington, Mark V
Miller, David L
Hedley, Sharon L
author_facet Bravington, Mark V
Miller, David L
Hedley, Sharon L
author_sort Bravington, Mark V
title Variance propagation for density surface models
title_short Variance propagation for density surface models
title_full Variance propagation for density surface models
title_fullStr Variance propagation for density surface models
title_full_unstemmed Variance propagation for density surface models
title_sort variance propagation for density surface models
publisher arXiv
publishDate 2018
url https://dx.doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1807.07996
https://arxiv.org/abs/1807.07996
long_lat ENVELOPE(-57.955,-57.955,-61.923,-61.923)
geographic Gam
geographic_facet Gam
genre Harbour porpoise
genre_facet Harbour porpoise
op_relation https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13253-021-00438-2
op_rights arXiv.org perpetual, non-exclusive license
http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1807.07996
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13253-021-00438-2
_version_ 1766023124320518144