Close evaluation of layer potentials in three dimensions

We present a simple and effective method for evaluating double-and single-layer potentials for Laplace's equation in three dimensions close to the boundary. The close evaluation of these layer potentials is challenging because they are nearly singular integrals. The method we propose is based o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Khatri, S., Kim, A. D., Cortez, Ricado, Carvalho, Camille
Format: Report
Language:unknown
Published: arXiv 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dx.doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1807.02474
https://arxiv.org/abs/1807.02474
Description
Summary:We present a simple and effective method for evaluating double-and single-layer potentials for Laplace's equation in three dimensions close to the boundary. The close evaluation of these layer potentials is challenging because they are nearly singular integrals. The method we propose is based on writing these layer potentials in spherical coordinates where the point at which their kernels are peaked maps to the north pole. An N-point Gauss-Legendre quadrature rule is used for integration with respect to the the polar angle rather than the cosine of the polar angle. A 2N-point periodic trapezoid rule is used to compute the integral with respect to the azimuthal angle which acts as a natural and effective averaging operation in this coordinate system. The numerical method resulting from combining these two quadrature rules in this rotated coordinate system yields results that are consistent with asymptotic behaviors of the double- and single-layer potentials at close evaluation distances. In particular, we show that the error in computing the double-layer potential, after applying a subtraction method, is quadratic with respect to the evaluation distance from the boundary, and the error is linear for the single-layer potential. We improve upon the single-layer potential by introducing an alternate approximation based on a perturbation expansion and obtain an error that is quadratic with respect to the evaluation distance from the boundary. : 21 pages, 15 figures