A comparison of two methods for detecting abrupt changes in the variance of climatic time series

Two methods for detecting abrupt shifts in the variance, Integrated Cumulative Sum of Squares (ICSS) and Sequential Regime Shift Detector (SRSD), have been compared on both synthetic and observed time series. In Monte Carlo experiments, SRSD outperformed ICSS in the overwhelming majority of the mode...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Rodionov, Sergei
Format: Text
Language:unknown
Published: arXiv 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dx.doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1602.09082
https://arxiv.org/abs/1602.09082
id ftdatacite:10.48550/arxiv.1602.09082
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdatacite:10.48550/arxiv.1602.09082 2023-05-15T14:57:45+02:00 A comparison of two methods for detecting abrupt changes in the variance of climatic time series Rodionov, Sergei 2016 https://dx.doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1602.09082 https://arxiv.org/abs/1602.09082 unknown arXiv https://dx.doi.org/10.5194/ascmo-2-63-2016 arXiv.org perpetual, non-exclusive license http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ Applications stat.AP Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics physics.ao-ph Methodology stat.ME FOS Computer and information sciences FOS Physical sciences article-journal Article ScholarlyArticle Text 2016 ftdatacite https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1602.09082 https://doi.org/10.5194/ascmo-2-63-2016 2022-04-01T11:41:24Z Two methods for detecting abrupt shifts in the variance, Integrated Cumulative Sum of Squares (ICSS) and Sequential Regime Shift Detector (SRSD), have been compared on both synthetic and observed time series. In Monte Carlo experiments, SRSD outperformed ICSS in the overwhelming majority of the modelled scenarios with different sequences of variance regimes. The SRSD advantage was particularly apparent in the case of outliers in the series. When tested on climatic time series, in most cases both methods detected the same change points in the longer series (252-787 monthly values). The only exception was the Arctic Ocean SST series, when ICSS found one extra change point that appeared to be spurious. As for the shorter time series (66-136 yearly values), ICSS failed to detect any change points even when the variance doubled or tripled from one regime to another. For these time series, SRSD is recommended. Interestingly, all the climatic time series tested, from the Arctic to the Tropics, had one thing in common: the last shift detected in each of these series was toward a high-variance regime. This is consistent with other findings of increased climate variability in recent decades. : 32 pages, 11 figures Text Arctic Arctic Ocean DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology) Arctic Arctic Ocean
institution Open Polar
collection DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology)
op_collection_id ftdatacite
language unknown
topic Applications stat.AP
Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics physics.ao-ph
Methodology stat.ME
FOS Computer and information sciences
FOS Physical sciences
spellingShingle Applications stat.AP
Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics physics.ao-ph
Methodology stat.ME
FOS Computer and information sciences
FOS Physical sciences
Rodionov, Sergei
A comparison of two methods for detecting abrupt changes in the variance of climatic time series
topic_facet Applications stat.AP
Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics physics.ao-ph
Methodology stat.ME
FOS Computer and information sciences
FOS Physical sciences
description Two methods for detecting abrupt shifts in the variance, Integrated Cumulative Sum of Squares (ICSS) and Sequential Regime Shift Detector (SRSD), have been compared on both synthetic and observed time series. In Monte Carlo experiments, SRSD outperformed ICSS in the overwhelming majority of the modelled scenarios with different sequences of variance regimes. The SRSD advantage was particularly apparent in the case of outliers in the series. When tested on climatic time series, in most cases both methods detected the same change points in the longer series (252-787 monthly values). The only exception was the Arctic Ocean SST series, when ICSS found one extra change point that appeared to be spurious. As for the shorter time series (66-136 yearly values), ICSS failed to detect any change points even when the variance doubled or tripled from one regime to another. For these time series, SRSD is recommended. Interestingly, all the climatic time series tested, from the Arctic to the Tropics, had one thing in common: the last shift detected in each of these series was toward a high-variance regime. This is consistent with other findings of increased climate variability in recent decades. : 32 pages, 11 figures
format Text
author Rodionov, Sergei
author_facet Rodionov, Sergei
author_sort Rodionov, Sergei
title A comparison of two methods for detecting abrupt changes in the variance of climatic time series
title_short A comparison of two methods for detecting abrupt changes in the variance of climatic time series
title_full A comparison of two methods for detecting abrupt changes in the variance of climatic time series
title_fullStr A comparison of two methods for detecting abrupt changes in the variance of climatic time series
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of two methods for detecting abrupt changes in the variance of climatic time series
title_sort comparison of two methods for detecting abrupt changes in the variance of climatic time series
publisher arXiv
publishDate 2016
url https://dx.doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1602.09082
https://arxiv.org/abs/1602.09082
geographic Arctic
Arctic Ocean
geographic_facet Arctic
Arctic Ocean
genre Arctic
Arctic Ocean
genre_facet Arctic
Arctic Ocean
op_relation https://dx.doi.org/10.5194/ascmo-2-63-2016
op_rights arXiv.org perpetual, non-exclusive license
http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1602.09082
https://doi.org/10.5194/ascmo-2-63-2016
_version_ 1766329880076615680