The lost sunspot cycle: New support from Be10 measurements

It has been suggested that the deficit in the number of spots on the surface of the Sun between 1790 and 1830, known as the Dalton minimum, contained an extra cycle that was not identified in the original sunspot record by Wolf. Though this cycle would be shorter and weaker than the average solar cy...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Karoff, C., Inceoglu, F., Knudsen, M. F., Olsen, J., Fogtmann-Schulz, A.
Format: Text
Language:unknown
Published: arXiv 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dx.doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1412.2931
https://arxiv.org/abs/1412.2931
id ftdatacite:10.48550/arxiv.1412.2931
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdatacite:10.48550/arxiv.1412.2931 2023-05-15T16:29:34+02:00 The lost sunspot cycle: New support from Be10 measurements Karoff, C. Inceoglu, F. Knudsen, M. F. Olsen, J. Fogtmann-Schulz, A. 2014 https://dx.doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1412.2931 https://arxiv.org/abs/1412.2931 unknown arXiv https://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201424927 arXiv.org perpetual, non-exclusive license http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ Solar and Stellar Astrophysics astro-ph.SR FOS Physical sciences article-journal Article ScholarlyArticle Text 2014 ftdatacite https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1412.2931 https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201424927 2022-04-01T12:32:01Z It has been suggested that the deficit in the number of spots on the surface of the Sun between 1790 and 1830, known as the Dalton minimum, contained an extra cycle that was not identified in the original sunspot record by Wolf. Though this cycle would be shorter and weaker than the average solar cycle, it would shift the magnetic parity of the solar magnetic field of the earlier cycles. This extra cycle is sometimes referred to as the 'lost solar cycle' or 'cycle 4b'. Here we reanalyse Be10 measurements with annual resolution from the NGRIP ice core in Greenland in order to investigate if the hypothesis regarding a lost sunspot cycle is supported by these measurements. Specifically, we make use of the fact that the Galactic cosmic rays, responsible for forming Be10 in the Earth's atmosphere, are affected differently by the open solar magnetic field during even and odd solar cycles. This fact enables us to evaluate if the numbering of cycles earlier than cycle 5 is correct. For the evaluation, we use Bayesian analysis, which reveals that the lost sunspot cycle hypothesis is likely to be correct. We also discuss if this cycle 4b is a real cycle, or a phase catastrophe, and what implications this has for our understanding of stellar activity cycles in general. : accepted for publication in A&A Text Greenland ice core NGRIP DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology) Greenland
institution Open Polar
collection DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology)
op_collection_id ftdatacite
language unknown
topic Solar and Stellar Astrophysics astro-ph.SR
FOS Physical sciences
spellingShingle Solar and Stellar Astrophysics astro-ph.SR
FOS Physical sciences
Karoff, C.
Inceoglu, F.
Knudsen, M. F.
Olsen, J.
Fogtmann-Schulz, A.
The lost sunspot cycle: New support from Be10 measurements
topic_facet Solar and Stellar Astrophysics astro-ph.SR
FOS Physical sciences
description It has been suggested that the deficit in the number of spots on the surface of the Sun between 1790 and 1830, known as the Dalton minimum, contained an extra cycle that was not identified in the original sunspot record by Wolf. Though this cycle would be shorter and weaker than the average solar cycle, it would shift the magnetic parity of the solar magnetic field of the earlier cycles. This extra cycle is sometimes referred to as the 'lost solar cycle' or 'cycle 4b'. Here we reanalyse Be10 measurements with annual resolution from the NGRIP ice core in Greenland in order to investigate if the hypothesis regarding a lost sunspot cycle is supported by these measurements. Specifically, we make use of the fact that the Galactic cosmic rays, responsible for forming Be10 in the Earth's atmosphere, are affected differently by the open solar magnetic field during even and odd solar cycles. This fact enables us to evaluate if the numbering of cycles earlier than cycle 5 is correct. For the evaluation, we use Bayesian analysis, which reveals that the lost sunspot cycle hypothesis is likely to be correct. We also discuss if this cycle 4b is a real cycle, or a phase catastrophe, and what implications this has for our understanding of stellar activity cycles in general. : accepted for publication in A&A
format Text
author Karoff, C.
Inceoglu, F.
Knudsen, M. F.
Olsen, J.
Fogtmann-Schulz, A.
author_facet Karoff, C.
Inceoglu, F.
Knudsen, M. F.
Olsen, J.
Fogtmann-Schulz, A.
author_sort Karoff, C.
title The lost sunspot cycle: New support from Be10 measurements
title_short The lost sunspot cycle: New support from Be10 measurements
title_full The lost sunspot cycle: New support from Be10 measurements
title_fullStr The lost sunspot cycle: New support from Be10 measurements
title_full_unstemmed The lost sunspot cycle: New support from Be10 measurements
title_sort lost sunspot cycle: new support from be10 measurements
publisher arXiv
publishDate 2014
url https://dx.doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1412.2931
https://arxiv.org/abs/1412.2931
geographic Greenland
geographic_facet Greenland
genre Greenland
ice core
NGRIP
genre_facet Greenland
ice core
NGRIP
op_relation https://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201424927
op_rights arXiv.org perpetual, non-exclusive license
http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1412.2931
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201424927
_version_ 1766019282245779456