Mass Calibration and Cosmological Analysis of the SPT-SZ Galaxy Cluster Sample Using Velocity Dispersion $σ_v$ and X-ray $Y_\textrm{X}$ Measurements
We present a velocity dispersion-based mass calibration of the South Pole Telescope Sunyaev-Zel'dovich effect survey (SPT-SZ) galaxy cluster sample. Using a homogeneously selected sample of 100 cluster candidates from 720 deg2 of the survey along with 63 velocity dispersion ($σ_v$) and 16 X-ray...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Text |
Language: | unknown |
Published: |
arXiv
2014
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://dx.doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1407.2942 https://arxiv.org/abs/1407.2942 |
Summary: | We present a velocity dispersion-based mass calibration of the South Pole Telescope Sunyaev-Zel'dovich effect survey (SPT-SZ) galaxy cluster sample. Using a homogeneously selected sample of 100 cluster candidates from 720 deg2 of the survey along with 63 velocity dispersion ($σ_v$) and 16 X-ray Yx measurements of sample clusters, we simultaneously calibrate the mass-observable relation and constrain cosmological parameters. The calibrations using $σ_v$ and Yx are consistent at the $0.6σ$ level, with the $σ_v$ calibration preferring ~16% higher masses. We use the full cluster dataset to measure $σ_8(Ω_ m/0.27)^{0.3}=0.809\pm0.036$. The SPT cluster abundance is lower than preferred by either the WMAP9 or Planck+WMAP9 polarization (WP) data, but assuming the sum of the neutrino masses is $\sum m_ν=0.06$ eV, we find the datasets to be consistent at the 1.0$σ$ level for WMAP9 and 1.5$σ$ for Planck+WP. Allowing for larger $\sum m_ν$ further reconciles the results. When we combine the cluster and Planck+WP datasets with BAO and SNIa, the preferred cluster masses are $1.9σ$ higher than the Yx calibration and $0.8σ$ higher than the $σ_v$ calibration. Given the scale of these shifts (~44% and ~23% in mass, respectively), we execute a goodness of fit test; it reveals no tension, indicating that the best-fit model provides an adequate description of the data. Using the multi-probe dataset, we measure $Ω_ m=0.299\pm0.009$ and $σ_8=0.829\pm0.011$. Within a $ν$CDM model we find $\sum m_ν= 0.148\pm0.081$ eV. We present a consistency test of the cosmic growth rate. Allowing both the growth index $γ$ and the dark energy equation of state parameter $w$ to vary, we find $γ=0.73\pm0.28$ and $w=-1.007\pm0.065$, demonstrating that the expansion and the growth histories are consistent with a LCDM model ($γ=0.55; \,w=-1$). : Accepted by ApJ (v2 is accepted version); 17 pages, 6 figures |
---|