Size change, shape change, and the growth space of a community
Measures of biodiversity change such as the Living Planet Index describe proportional change in the abundance of a typical species, which can be thought of as change in the size of a community. Here, I discuss the orthogonal concept of change in relative abundances, which I refer to as shape change....
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Report |
Language: | unknown |
Published: |
arXiv
2014
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://dx.doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1404.0942 https://arxiv.org/abs/1404.0942 |
Summary: | Measures of biodiversity change such as the Living Planet Index describe proportional change in the abundance of a typical species, which can be thought of as change in the size of a community. Here, I discuss the orthogonal concept of change in relative abundances, which I refer to as shape change. To be logically consistent, a measure of the rate of shape change should be scaling invariant (have the same value for all data with the same vector of proportional change over a given time interval), but existing measures do not have this property. I derive a new, scaling invariant measure. I show that this new measure and existing measures of biodiversity change such as the Living Planet Index describe different aspects of dynamics. I show that neither body size nor environmental variability need affect the rate of shape change. I extend the measure to deal with colonizations and extinctions, using the surreal number system. I give examples using data on hoverflies in a garden in Leicester, UK, and the higher plant community of Surtsey. I hypothesize that phylogenetically-restricted assemblages will show a higher proportion of size change than diverse communities. : 47 pages, 7 figures. Extensively revised version in response to reviewers' comments |
---|