CMB Telescopes and Optical Systems
The cosmic microwave background radiation (CMB) is now firmly established as a fundamental and essential probe of the geometry, constituents, and birth of the Universe. The CMB is a potent observable because it can be measured with precision and accuracy. Just as importantly, theoretical models of t...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Text |
Language: | unknown |
Published: |
arXiv
2012
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://dx.doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1206.2402 https://arxiv.org/abs/1206.2402 |
id |
ftdatacite:10.48550/arxiv.1206.2402 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftdatacite:10.48550/arxiv.1206.2402 2023-05-15T18:22:52+02:00 CMB Telescopes and Optical Systems Hanany, S. Niemack, M. Page, L. 2012 https://dx.doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1206.2402 https://arxiv.org/abs/1206.2402 unknown arXiv https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5621-2_10 arXiv.org perpetual, non-exclusive license http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics astro-ph.IM FOS Physical sciences article-journal Article ScholarlyArticle Text 2012 ftdatacite https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1206.2402 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5621-2_10 2022-04-01T13:53:36Z The cosmic microwave background radiation (CMB) is now firmly established as a fundamental and essential probe of the geometry, constituents, and birth of the Universe. The CMB is a potent observable because it can be measured with precision and accuracy. Just as importantly, theoretical models of the Universe can predict the characteristics of the CMB to high accuracy, and those predictions can be directly compared to observations. There are multiple aspects associated with making a precise measurement. In this review, we focus on optical components for the instrumentation used to measure the CMB polarization and temperature anisotropy. We begin with an overview of general considerations for CMB observations and discuss common concepts used in the community. We next consider a variety of alternatives available for a designer of a CMB telescope. Our discussion is guided by the ground and balloon-based instruments that have been implemented over the years. In the same vein, we compare the arc-minute resolution Atacama Cosmology Telescope (ACT) and the South Pole Telescope (SPT). CMB interferometers are presented briefly. We conclude with a comparison of the four CMB satellites, Relikt, COBE, WMAP, and Planck, to demonstrate a remarkable evolution in design, sensitivity, resolution, and complexity over the past thirty years. : To appear in: Planets, Stars and Stellar Systems (PSSS), Volume 1: Telescopes and Instrumentation Text South pole DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology) South Pole |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology) |
op_collection_id |
ftdatacite |
language |
unknown |
topic |
Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics astro-ph.IM FOS Physical sciences |
spellingShingle |
Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics astro-ph.IM FOS Physical sciences Hanany, S. Niemack, M. Page, L. CMB Telescopes and Optical Systems |
topic_facet |
Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics astro-ph.IM FOS Physical sciences |
description |
The cosmic microwave background radiation (CMB) is now firmly established as a fundamental and essential probe of the geometry, constituents, and birth of the Universe. The CMB is a potent observable because it can be measured with precision and accuracy. Just as importantly, theoretical models of the Universe can predict the characteristics of the CMB to high accuracy, and those predictions can be directly compared to observations. There are multiple aspects associated with making a precise measurement. In this review, we focus on optical components for the instrumentation used to measure the CMB polarization and temperature anisotropy. We begin with an overview of general considerations for CMB observations and discuss common concepts used in the community. We next consider a variety of alternatives available for a designer of a CMB telescope. Our discussion is guided by the ground and balloon-based instruments that have been implemented over the years. In the same vein, we compare the arc-minute resolution Atacama Cosmology Telescope (ACT) and the South Pole Telescope (SPT). CMB interferometers are presented briefly. We conclude with a comparison of the four CMB satellites, Relikt, COBE, WMAP, and Planck, to demonstrate a remarkable evolution in design, sensitivity, resolution, and complexity over the past thirty years. : To appear in: Planets, Stars and Stellar Systems (PSSS), Volume 1: Telescopes and Instrumentation |
format |
Text |
author |
Hanany, S. Niemack, M. Page, L. |
author_facet |
Hanany, S. Niemack, M. Page, L. |
author_sort |
Hanany, S. |
title |
CMB Telescopes and Optical Systems |
title_short |
CMB Telescopes and Optical Systems |
title_full |
CMB Telescopes and Optical Systems |
title_fullStr |
CMB Telescopes and Optical Systems |
title_full_unstemmed |
CMB Telescopes and Optical Systems |
title_sort |
cmb telescopes and optical systems |
publisher |
arXiv |
publishDate |
2012 |
url |
https://dx.doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1206.2402 https://arxiv.org/abs/1206.2402 |
geographic |
South Pole |
geographic_facet |
South Pole |
genre |
South pole |
genre_facet |
South pole |
op_relation |
https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5621-2_10 |
op_rights |
arXiv.org perpetual, non-exclusive license http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1206.2402 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5621-2_10 |
_version_ |
1766202282865590272 |