Limits on Superconductivity-Related Magnetization in Sr$_2$RuO$_4$ and PrOs$_4$Sb$_{12}$ from Scanning SQUID Microscopy

We present scanning SQUID microscopy data on the superconductors Sr2RuO4 (Tc = 1.5 K) and PrOs$_4$Sb$_{12}$ (Tc = 1.8 K). In both of these materials, superconductivity-related time-reversal symmetry-breaking fields have been observed by muon spin rotation; our aim was to visualize the structure of t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hicks, Clifford W., Kirtley, John R., Lippman, Thomas M., Koshnick, Nicholas C., Huber, Martin E., Maeno, Yoshiteru, Yuhasz, William M., Maple, M. Brian, Moler, Kathryn A.
Format: Text
Language:unknown
Published: arXiv 2010
Subjects:
IPY
Online Access:https://dx.doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1003.2189
https://arxiv.org/abs/1003.2189
id ftdatacite:10.48550/arxiv.1003.2189
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdatacite:10.48550/arxiv.1003.2189 2023-05-15T16:55:51+02:00 Limits on Superconductivity-Related Magnetization in Sr$_2$RuO$_4$ and PrOs$_4$Sb$_{12}$ from Scanning SQUID Microscopy Hicks, Clifford W. Kirtley, John R. Lippman, Thomas M. Koshnick, Nicholas C. Huber, Martin E. Maeno, Yoshiteru Yuhasz, William M. Maple, M. Brian Moler, Kathryn A. 2010 https://dx.doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1003.2189 https://arxiv.org/abs/1003.2189 unknown arXiv https://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.81.214501 arXiv.org perpetual, non-exclusive license http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ Superconductivity cond-mat.supr-con FOS Physical sciences article-journal Article ScholarlyArticle Text 2010 ftdatacite https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1003.2189 https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.81.214501 2022-04-01T14:49:41Z We present scanning SQUID microscopy data on the superconductors Sr2RuO4 (Tc = 1.5 K) and PrOs$_4$Sb$_{12}$ (Tc = 1.8 K). In both of these materials, superconductivity-related time-reversal symmetry-breaking fields have been observed by muon spin rotation; our aim was to visualize the structure of these fields. However in neither Sr$_2$RuO$_4$ nor PrOs$_4$Sb$_{12}$ do we observe spontaneous superconductivity-related magnetization. In Sr$_2$RuO$_4$, many experimental results have been interpreted on the basis of a $px \pm ipy$ superconducting order parameter. This order parameter is expected to give spontaneous magnetic induction at sample edges and order parameter domain walls. Supposing large domains, our data restrict domain wall and edge fields to no more than ~0.1% and ~0.2% of the expected magnitude, respectively. Alternatively, if the magnetization is of the expected order, the typical domain size is limited to ~30 nm for random domains, or ~500 nm for periodic domains. : 8 pages, 7 figures. Submitted to Phys. Rev. B Text IPY DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology)
institution Open Polar
collection DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology)
op_collection_id ftdatacite
language unknown
topic Superconductivity cond-mat.supr-con
FOS Physical sciences
spellingShingle Superconductivity cond-mat.supr-con
FOS Physical sciences
Hicks, Clifford W.
Kirtley, John R.
Lippman, Thomas M.
Koshnick, Nicholas C.
Huber, Martin E.
Maeno, Yoshiteru
Yuhasz, William M.
Maple, M. Brian
Moler, Kathryn A.
Limits on Superconductivity-Related Magnetization in Sr$_2$RuO$_4$ and PrOs$_4$Sb$_{12}$ from Scanning SQUID Microscopy
topic_facet Superconductivity cond-mat.supr-con
FOS Physical sciences
description We present scanning SQUID microscopy data on the superconductors Sr2RuO4 (Tc = 1.5 K) and PrOs$_4$Sb$_{12}$ (Tc = 1.8 K). In both of these materials, superconductivity-related time-reversal symmetry-breaking fields have been observed by muon spin rotation; our aim was to visualize the structure of these fields. However in neither Sr$_2$RuO$_4$ nor PrOs$_4$Sb$_{12}$ do we observe spontaneous superconductivity-related magnetization. In Sr$_2$RuO$_4$, many experimental results have been interpreted on the basis of a $px \pm ipy$ superconducting order parameter. This order parameter is expected to give spontaneous magnetic induction at sample edges and order parameter domain walls. Supposing large domains, our data restrict domain wall and edge fields to no more than ~0.1% and ~0.2% of the expected magnitude, respectively. Alternatively, if the magnetization is of the expected order, the typical domain size is limited to ~30 nm for random domains, or ~500 nm for periodic domains. : 8 pages, 7 figures. Submitted to Phys. Rev. B
format Text
author Hicks, Clifford W.
Kirtley, John R.
Lippman, Thomas M.
Koshnick, Nicholas C.
Huber, Martin E.
Maeno, Yoshiteru
Yuhasz, William M.
Maple, M. Brian
Moler, Kathryn A.
author_facet Hicks, Clifford W.
Kirtley, John R.
Lippman, Thomas M.
Koshnick, Nicholas C.
Huber, Martin E.
Maeno, Yoshiteru
Yuhasz, William M.
Maple, M. Brian
Moler, Kathryn A.
author_sort Hicks, Clifford W.
title Limits on Superconductivity-Related Magnetization in Sr$_2$RuO$_4$ and PrOs$_4$Sb$_{12}$ from Scanning SQUID Microscopy
title_short Limits on Superconductivity-Related Magnetization in Sr$_2$RuO$_4$ and PrOs$_4$Sb$_{12}$ from Scanning SQUID Microscopy
title_full Limits on Superconductivity-Related Magnetization in Sr$_2$RuO$_4$ and PrOs$_4$Sb$_{12}$ from Scanning SQUID Microscopy
title_fullStr Limits on Superconductivity-Related Magnetization in Sr$_2$RuO$_4$ and PrOs$_4$Sb$_{12}$ from Scanning SQUID Microscopy
title_full_unstemmed Limits on Superconductivity-Related Magnetization in Sr$_2$RuO$_4$ and PrOs$_4$Sb$_{12}$ from Scanning SQUID Microscopy
title_sort limits on superconductivity-related magnetization in sr$_2$ruo$_4$ and pros$_4$sb$_{12}$ from scanning squid microscopy
publisher arXiv
publishDate 2010
url https://dx.doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1003.2189
https://arxiv.org/abs/1003.2189
genre IPY
genre_facet IPY
op_relation https://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.81.214501
op_rights arXiv.org perpetual, non-exclusive license
http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1003.2189
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.81.214501
_version_ 1766046892475547648