The radical right: both winners and losers in northern Europe.

Radical right-wing parties have been increasing their electoral success across Europe over the last few decades. Despite the widely covered surge in their success, many radical right-wing parties have achieved marginal to no electoral success, but there continues to be a lack of research trying to e...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Noxon, Clarissa Miles
Format: Text
Language:unknown
Published: Memorial University of Newfoundland 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dx.doi.org/10.48336/q3rq-h194
https://research.library.mun.ca/14644/
id ftdatacite:10.48336/q3rq-h194
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdatacite:10.48336/q3rq-h194 2023-05-15T16:50:57+02:00 The radical right: both winners and losers in northern Europe. Noxon, Clarissa Miles 2020 https://dx.doi.org/10.48336/q3rq-h194 https://research.library.mun.ca/14644/ unknown Memorial University of Newfoundland article-journal Text ScholarlyArticle 2020 ftdatacite https://doi.org/10.48336/q3rq-h194 2022-02-08T12:55:18Z Radical right-wing parties have been increasing their electoral success across Europe over the last few decades. Despite the widely covered surge in their success, many radical right-wing parties have achieved marginal to no electoral success, but there continues to be a lack of research trying to explain their failure. The question guiding this thesis focuses on why there is varied electoral success of radical right-wing parties across Europe and suggests that it could be explained through differences in the importance of economic compared to cultural-political issues in each country. To investigate this, the work uses data from public opinion surveys and party manifesto content from three countries which saw different radical right-wing party success in elections between 2005 and 2011 - Finland, Norway, and Iceland. Tentative findings indicate that cultural issues were the most salient in the public and amongst parties in the country with the most electorally successful radical right-wing party, Norway. Broadly, however, the public is still much more focused on economic issues than cultural issues, but political party rhetoric is much more evenly divided. Partisanship is the most influential factor on vote choice and though issue salience was rarely significant in vote choice, it was nearly always significant when trying to explain partisanship. Though issue salience is not directly influencing vote choice, it is influencing partisanship which has a strong impact on vote choice. Text Iceland DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology) Norway
institution Open Polar
collection DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology)
op_collection_id ftdatacite
language unknown
description Radical right-wing parties have been increasing their electoral success across Europe over the last few decades. Despite the widely covered surge in their success, many radical right-wing parties have achieved marginal to no electoral success, but there continues to be a lack of research trying to explain their failure. The question guiding this thesis focuses on why there is varied electoral success of radical right-wing parties across Europe and suggests that it could be explained through differences in the importance of economic compared to cultural-political issues in each country. To investigate this, the work uses data from public opinion surveys and party manifesto content from three countries which saw different radical right-wing party success in elections between 2005 and 2011 - Finland, Norway, and Iceland. Tentative findings indicate that cultural issues were the most salient in the public and amongst parties in the country with the most electorally successful radical right-wing party, Norway. Broadly, however, the public is still much more focused on economic issues than cultural issues, but political party rhetoric is much more evenly divided. Partisanship is the most influential factor on vote choice and though issue salience was rarely significant in vote choice, it was nearly always significant when trying to explain partisanship. Though issue salience is not directly influencing vote choice, it is influencing partisanship which has a strong impact on vote choice.
format Text
author Noxon, Clarissa Miles
spellingShingle Noxon, Clarissa Miles
The radical right: both winners and losers in northern Europe.
author_facet Noxon, Clarissa Miles
author_sort Noxon, Clarissa Miles
title The radical right: both winners and losers in northern Europe.
title_short The radical right: both winners and losers in northern Europe.
title_full The radical right: both winners and losers in northern Europe.
title_fullStr The radical right: both winners and losers in northern Europe.
title_full_unstemmed The radical right: both winners and losers in northern Europe.
title_sort radical right: both winners and losers in northern europe.
publisher Memorial University of Newfoundland
publishDate 2020
url https://dx.doi.org/10.48336/q3rq-h194
https://research.library.mun.ca/14644/
geographic Norway
geographic_facet Norway
genre Iceland
genre_facet Iceland
op_doi https://doi.org/10.48336/q3rq-h194
_version_ 1766041054402838528