An Extended Global Catalogue of Giant (Mw &[ge] 8.8) Earthquakes

Earthquakes with Mw of greater than 8.7 are distinguished by extensive regional damage from seismic shaking as well as the size of the tsunami generated, typically causing at least 1m of tsunami runup across an ocean in addition to being devastating in the near-field. Additionally, the 40-year hiatu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Onur, Tuna, Muir-Wood, Robert
Format: Conference Object
Language:unknown
Published: Network for Earthquake Engineering Simulation (NEES) 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dx.doi.org/10.4231/d3mw28f7z
https://nees.org/resources/12495
id ftdatacite:10.4231/d3mw28f7z
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdatacite:10.4231/d3mw28f7z 2023-05-15T16:59:18+02:00 An Extended Global Catalogue of Giant (Mw &[ge] 8.8) Earthquakes Onur, Tuna Muir-Wood, Robert 2014 https://dx.doi.org/10.4231/d3mw28f7z https://nees.org/resources/12495 unknown Network for Earthquake Engineering Simulation (NEES) CC BY 3.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 CC-BY Text Conference Papers article-journal ScholarlyArticle 2014 ftdatacite https://doi.org/10.4231/d3mw28f7z 2021-11-05T12:55:41Z Earthquakes with Mw of greater than 8.7 are distinguished by extensive regional damage from seismic shaking as well as the size of the tsunami generated, typically causing at least 1m of tsunami runup across an ocean in addition to being devastating in the near-field. Additionally, the 40-year hiatus after the 1952-1964 trio of great earthquakes (1952 Mw9.0 Kamchatka, 1960 Mw9.6 Chile, and 1964 Mw9.0 Alaska) and the recent trio of great earthquakes in short succession (2004 Mw9.0 Sumatra-Andaman, 2010 Mw8.8 Chile, and 2011 Mw9.0 Japan) have sparked discussions around temporal clustering of great earthquakes. Most currently available earthquake catalogues start recording events around 1900, when seismic instrumentation started. However, this is too short a record to adequately study great earthquakes. In this study, we aim to extend the great earthquake catalogue by at least two centuries taking advantage of the large scale impact these earthquakes (and their accompanying tsunamis) have caused in the near- and far-fields. For each event in the catalogue, we make estimates for moment magnitude and rupture extent based on various lines of evidence such as recorded tsunami runup near- and far-fields, amplitude and duration of reported earthquake shaking, evidence of land-level changes such as offshore uplift and near-shore subsidence, and any paleoseismic studies that are available. Conference Object Kamchatka Alaska DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology)
institution Open Polar
collection DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology)
op_collection_id ftdatacite
language unknown
description Earthquakes with Mw of greater than 8.7 are distinguished by extensive regional damage from seismic shaking as well as the size of the tsunami generated, typically causing at least 1m of tsunami runup across an ocean in addition to being devastating in the near-field. Additionally, the 40-year hiatus after the 1952-1964 trio of great earthquakes (1952 Mw9.0 Kamchatka, 1960 Mw9.6 Chile, and 1964 Mw9.0 Alaska) and the recent trio of great earthquakes in short succession (2004 Mw9.0 Sumatra-Andaman, 2010 Mw8.8 Chile, and 2011 Mw9.0 Japan) have sparked discussions around temporal clustering of great earthquakes. Most currently available earthquake catalogues start recording events around 1900, when seismic instrumentation started. However, this is too short a record to adequately study great earthquakes. In this study, we aim to extend the great earthquake catalogue by at least two centuries taking advantage of the large scale impact these earthquakes (and their accompanying tsunamis) have caused in the near- and far-fields. For each event in the catalogue, we make estimates for moment magnitude and rupture extent based on various lines of evidence such as recorded tsunami runup near- and far-fields, amplitude and duration of reported earthquake shaking, evidence of land-level changes such as offshore uplift and near-shore subsidence, and any paleoseismic studies that are available.
format Conference Object
author Onur, Tuna
Muir-Wood, Robert
spellingShingle Onur, Tuna
Muir-Wood, Robert
An Extended Global Catalogue of Giant (Mw &[ge] 8.8) Earthquakes
author_facet Onur, Tuna
Muir-Wood, Robert
author_sort Onur, Tuna
title An Extended Global Catalogue of Giant (Mw &[ge] 8.8) Earthquakes
title_short An Extended Global Catalogue of Giant (Mw &[ge] 8.8) Earthquakes
title_full An Extended Global Catalogue of Giant (Mw &[ge] 8.8) Earthquakes
title_fullStr An Extended Global Catalogue of Giant (Mw &[ge] 8.8) Earthquakes
title_full_unstemmed An Extended Global Catalogue of Giant (Mw &[ge] 8.8) Earthquakes
title_sort extended global catalogue of giant (mw &[ge] 8.8) earthquakes
publisher Network for Earthquake Engineering Simulation (NEES)
publishDate 2014
url https://dx.doi.org/10.4231/d3mw28f7z
https://nees.org/resources/12495
genre Kamchatka
Alaska
genre_facet Kamchatka
Alaska
op_rights CC BY 3.0
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0
op_rightsnorm CC-BY
op_doi https://doi.org/10.4231/d3mw28f7z
_version_ 1766051532612042752