Codesign in the Indigenous policy domain: Risks and opportunities ...

In recent years, the requirement for First Nations participation through codesign has emerged as a key prerequisite of policy legitimacy in the Indigenous policy domain. In this Discussion Paper, the mainstream literature on codesign and collaborative governance is surveyed and considered, as a mean...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Dillon, Michael
Format: Report
Language:English
Published: Canberra, ACT: Australian National University, Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research (CAEPR) 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dx.doi.org/10.25911/wmjk-ce98
https://openresearch-repository.anu.edu.au/handle/1885/224450
id ftdatacite:10.25911/wmjk-ce98
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdatacite:10.25911/wmjk-ce98 2024-02-27T08:40:32+00:00 Codesign in the Indigenous policy domain: Risks and opportunities ... Dillon, Michael 2021 application/pdf https://dx.doi.org/10.25911/wmjk-ce98 https://openresearch-repository.anu.edu.au/handle/1885/224450 en eng Canberra, ACT: Australian National University, Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research (CAEPR) Author/s retain copyright codesign collaborative governance deliberative democracy shared decision-making Indigenous policy development public policy policy design Closing the Gap Indigenous Voice Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples Working/Technical Paper CreativeWork Other article 2021 ftdatacite https://doi.org/10.25911/wmjk-ce98 2024-02-01T15:41:35Z In recent years, the requirement for First Nations participation through codesign has emerged as a key prerequisite of policy legitimacy in the Indigenous policy domain. In this Discussion Paper, the mainstream literature on codesign and collaborative governance is surveyed and considered, as a means of identifying the essential characteristics of effective codesign policy and program processes. The literature survey identifies two strands: one that asserts the merits and opportunities inherent in policy and program codesign, and a second that highlights the risks and challenges. Two nationally significant current and ongoing Indigenous policy development processes that have been described as codesign processes are then analysed and assessed. The paper concludes that codesign involves more than consultation, and ideally requires shared decision-making. Further, in relation to policy codesign processes, the literature and cases studies suggest the core design features that are required to ensure the processes ... Report First Nations DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology)
institution Open Polar
collection DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology)
op_collection_id ftdatacite
language English
topic codesign
collaborative governance
deliberative democracy
shared decision-making
Indigenous policy development
public policy
policy design
Closing the Gap
Indigenous Voice
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples
spellingShingle codesign
collaborative governance
deliberative democracy
shared decision-making
Indigenous policy development
public policy
policy design
Closing the Gap
Indigenous Voice
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples
Dillon, Michael
Codesign in the Indigenous policy domain: Risks and opportunities ...
topic_facet codesign
collaborative governance
deliberative democracy
shared decision-making
Indigenous policy development
public policy
policy design
Closing the Gap
Indigenous Voice
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples
description In recent years, the requirement for First Nations participation through codesign has emerged as a key prerequisite of policy legitimacy in the Indigenous policy domain. In this Discussion Paper, the mainstream literature on codesign and collaborative governance is surveyed and considered, as a means of identifying the essential characteristics of effective codesign policy and program processes. The literature survey identifies two strands: one that asserts the merits and opportunities inherent in policy and program codesign, and a second that highlights the risks and challenges. Two nationally significant current and ongoing Indigenous policy development processes that have been described as codesign processes are then analysed and assessed. The paper concludes that codesign involves more than consultation, and ideally requires shared decision-making. Further, in relation to policy codesign processes, the literature and cases studies suggest the core design features that are required to ensure the processes ...
format Report
author Dillon, Michael
author_facet Dillon, Michael
author_sort Dillon, Michael
title Codesign in the Indigenous policy domain: Risks and opportunities ...
title_short Codesign in the Indigenous policy domain: Risks and opportunities ...
title_full Codesign in the Indigenous policy domain: Risks and opportunities ...
title_fullStr Codesign in the Indigenous policy domain: Risks and opportunities ...
title_full_unstemmed Codesign in the Indigenous policy domain: Risks and opportunities ...
title_sort codesign in the indigenous policy domain: risks and opportunities ...
publisher Canberra, ACT: Australian National University, Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research (CAEPR)
publishDate 2021
url https://dx.doi.org/10.25911/wmjk-ce98
https://openresearch-repository.anu.edu.au/handle/1885/224450
genre First Nations
genre_facet First Nations
op_rights Author/s retain copyright
op_doi https://doi.org/10.25911/wmjk-ce98
_version_ 1792047654610403328