Codesign in the Indigenous policy domain: Risks and opportunities ...
In recent years, the requirement for First Nations participation through codesign has emerged as a key prerequisite of policy legitimacy in the Indigenous policy domain. In this Discussion Paper, the mainstream literature on codesign and collaborative governance is surveyed and considered, as a mean...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Report |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Canberra, ACT: Australian National University, Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research (CAEPR)
2021
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://dx.doi.org/10.25911/wmjk-ce98 https://openresearch-repository.anu.edu.au/handle/1885/224450 |
id |
ftdatacite:10.25911/wmjk-ce98 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftdatacite:10.25911/wmjk-ce98 2024-02-27T08:40:32+00:00 Codesign in the Indigenous policy domain: Risks and opportunities ... Dillon, Michael 2021 application/pdf https://dx.doi.org/10.25911/wmjk-ce98 https://openresearch-repository.anu.edu.au/handle/1885/224450 en eng Canberra, ACT: Australian National University, Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research (CAEPR) Author/s retain copyright codesign collaborative governance deliberative democracy shared decision-making Indigenous policy development public policy policy design Closing the Gap Indigenous Voice Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples Working/Technical Paper CreativeWork Other article 2021 ftdatacite https://doi.org/10.25911/wmjk-ce98 2024-02-01T15:41:35Z In recent years, the requirement for First Nations participation through codesign has emerged as a key prerequisite of policy legitimacy in the Indigenous policy domain. In this Discussion Paper, the mainstream literature on codesign and collaborative governance is surveyed and considered, as a means of identifying the essential characteristics of effective codesign policy and program processes. The literature survey identifies two strands: one that asserts the merits and opportunities inherent in policy and program codesign, and a second that highlights the risks and challenges. Two nationally significant current and ongoing Indigenous policy development processes that have been described as codesign processes are then analysed and assessed. The paper concludes that codesign involves more than consultation, and ideally requires shared decision-making. Further, in relation to policy codesign processes, the literature and cases studies suggest the core design features that are required to ensure the processes ... Report First Nations DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology) |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology) |
op_collection_id |
ftdatacite |
language |
English |
topic |
codesign collaborative governance deliberative democracy shared decision-making Indigenous policy development public policy policy design Closing the Gap Indigenous Voice Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples |
spellingShingle |
codesign collaborative governance deliberative democracy shared decision-making Indigenous policy development public policy policy design Closing the Gap Indigenous Voice Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples Dillon, Michael Codesign in the Indigenous policy domain: Risks and opportunities ... |
topic_facet |
codesign collaborative governance deliberative democracy shared decision-making Indigenous policy development public policy policy design Closing the Gap Indigenous Voice Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples |
description |
In recent years, the requirement for First Nations participation through codesign has emerged as a key prerequisite of policy legitimacy in the Indigenous policy domain. In this Discussion Paper, the mainstream literature on codesign and collaborative governance is surveyed and considered, as a means of identifying the essential characteristics of effective codesign policy and program processes. The literature survey identifies two strands: one that asserts the merits and opportunities inherent in policy and program codesign, and a second that highlights the risks and challenges. Two nationally significant current and ongoing Indigenous policy development processes that have been described as codesign processes are then analysed and assessed. The paper concludes that codesign involves more than consultation, and ideally requires shared decision-making. Further, in relation to policy codesign processes, the literature and cases studies suggest the core design features that are required to ensure the processes ... |
format |
Report |
author |
Dillon, Michael |
author_facet |
Dillon, Michael |
author_sort |
Dillon, Michael |
title |
Codesign in the Indigenous policy domain: Risks and opportunities ... |
title_short |
Codesign in the Indigenous policy domain: Risks and opportunities ... |
title_full |
Codesign in the Indigenous policy domain: Risks and opportunities ... |
title_fullStr |
Codesign in the Indigenous policy domain: Risks and opportunities ... |
title_full_unstemmed |
Codesign in the Indigenous policy domain: Risks and opportunities ... |
title_sort |
codesign in the indigenous policy domain: risks and opportunities ... |
publisher |
Canberra, ACT: Australian National University, Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research (CAEPR) |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://dx.doi.org/10.25911/wmjk-ce98 https://openresearch-repository.anu.edu.au/handle/1885/224450 |
genre |
First Nations |
genre_facet |
First Nations |
op_rights |
Author/s retain copyright |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.25911/wmjk-ce98 |
_version_ |
1792047654610403328 |