Applications of Two-Eyed Seeing in Primary Research Focused on Indigenous Health: A Scoping Review

Mi’kmaq Elder Albert Marshall coined “Two-Eyed Seeing” in 2004, an Indigenous concept that emphasizes integrating the strengths of multiple perspectives to address complex challenges in ways that benefit all. In 2011, Two-Eyed Seeing became a policy of the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIH...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Forbes, Andrew, Ritchie, Stephen, Walker, Jennifer, Young, Nancy
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: SAGE Journals 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dx.doi.org/10.25384/sage.c.5020532
https://sage.figshare.com/collections/Applications_of_Two-Eyed_Seeing_in_Primary_Research_Focused_on_Indigenous_Health_A_Scoping_Review/5020532
id ftdatacite:10.25384/sage.c.5020532
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdatacite:10.25384/sage.c.5020532 2023-05-15T17:12:57+02:00 Applications of Two-Eyed Seeing in Primary Research Focused on Indigenous Health: A Scoping Review Forbes, Andrew Ritchie, Stephen Walker, Jennifer Young, Nancy 2020 https://dx.doi.org/10.25384/sage.c.5020532 https://sage.figshare.com/collections/Applications_of_Two-Eyed_Seeing_in_Primary_Research_Focused_on_Indigenous_Health_A_Scoping_Review/5020532 unknown SAGE Journals https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1609406920929110 CC BY 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 CC-BY 111708 Health and Community Services FOS Health sciences 111099 Nursing not elsewhere classified 160807 Sociological Methodology and Research Methods FOS Sociology Collection article 2020 ftdatacite https://doi.org/10.25384/sage.c.5020532 https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920929110 2021-11-05T12:55:41Z Mi’kmaq Elder Albert Marshall coined “Two-Eyed Seeing” in 2004, an Indigenous concept that emphasizes integrating the strengths of multiple perspectives to address complex challenges in ways that benefit all. In 2011, Two-Eyed Seeing became a policy of the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)–Institute of Aboriginal Peoples’ Health, as a part of its 5-year plan, and in 2012, CIHR funding was directed toward supporting efforts that apply the concept of Two-Eyed Seeing to research. However, little is known about how Two-Eyed Seeing has been operationalized in research. To address this ambiguity, a scoping review was conducted to map the key concepts involved when researchers intend to follow Two-Eyed Seeing guiding principles to study Indigenous health topics. Three research questions guided this scoping review: (1) What are the general characteristics (e.g., location of study, health topic studied) of primary research that has attempted to apply Two-Eyed Seeing when studying Indigenous health topics? (2) How did researchers operationalize the concept of Two-Eyed Seeing when they applied it to primary studies regarding Indigenous health topics? and (3) What process-related elements were present in Two-Eyed Seeing studies that accomplished their objectives? The results of this scoping review indicate there is an increasing trend in Two-Eyed Seeing–related peer-reviewed publications since its formal introduction by Mi’kmaq Elder Albert Marshall. The selected Two-Eyed Seeing–related projects were predominately conducted in Canada and published between 2011 and 2019. Projects predominately incorporated a community-based (participatory) research approach and qualitative/Indigenous methods, and six core process–related themes/elements were identified: (i) power was shared, (ii) culturally safe spaces were fostered, (iii) institutional and community ethics were followed, (iv) research projects were transformative, (v) rigor was maintained, and (vi) the structure of Western academia and traditional policy decision-making processes provided challenges for research teams and community partners, respectively. Article in Journal/Newspaper Mi’kmaq DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology) Canada
institution Open Polar
collection DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology)
op_collection_id ftdatacite
language unknown
topic 111708 Health and Community Services
FOS Health sciences
111099 Nursing not elsewhere classified
160807 Sociological Methodology and Research Methods
FOS Sociology
spellingShingle 111708 Health and Community Services
FOS Health sciences
111099 Nursing not elsewhere classified
160807 Sociological Methodology and Research Methods
FOS Sociology
Forbes, Andrew
Ritchie, Stephen
Walker, Jennifer
Young, Nancy
Applications of Two-Eyed Seeing in Primary Research Focused on Indigenous Health: A Scoping Review
topic_facet 111708 Health and Community Services
FOS Health sciences
111099 Nursing not elsewhere classified
160807 Sociological Methodology and Research Methods
FOS Sociology
description Mi’kmaq Elder Albert Marshall coined “Two-Eyed Seeing” in 2004, an Indigenous concept that emphasizes integrating the strengths of multiple perspectives to address complex challenges in ways that benefit all. In 2011, Two-Eyed Seeing became a policy of the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)–Institute of Aboriginal Peoples’ Health, as a part of its 5-year plan, and in 2012, CIHR funding was directed toward supporting efforts that apply the concept of Two-Eyed Seeing to research. However, little is known about how Two-Eyed Seeing has been operationalized in research. To address this ambiguity, a scoping review was conducted to map the key concepts involved when researchers intend to follow Two-Eyed Seeing guiding principles to study Indigenous health topics. Three research questions guided this scoping review: (1) What are the general characteristics (e.g., location of study, health topic studied) of primary research that has attempted to apply Two-Eyed Seeing when studying Indigenous health topics? (2) How did researchers operationalize the concept of Two-Eyed Seeing when they applied it to primary studies regarding Indigenous health topics? and (3) What process-related elements were present in Two-Eyed Seeing studies that accomplished their objectives? The results of this scoping review indicate there is an increasing trend in Two-Eyed Seeing–related peer-reviewed publications since its formal introduction by Mi’kmaq Elder Albert Marshall. The selected Two-Eyed Seeing–related projects were predominately conducted in Canada and published between 2011 and 2019. Projects predominately incorporated a community-based (participatory) research approach and qualitative/Indigenous methods, and six core process–related themes/elements were identified: (i) power was shared, (ii) culturally safe spaces were fostered, (iii) institutional and community ethics were followed, (iv) research projects were transformative, (v) rigor was maintained, and (vi) the structure of Western academia and traditional policy decision-making processes provided challenges for research teams and community partners, respectively.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Forbes, Andrew
Ritchie, Stephen
Walker, Jennifer
Young, Nancy
author_facet Forbes, Andrew
Ritchie, Stephen
Walker, Jennifer
Young, Nancy
author_sort Forbes, Andrew
title Applications of Two-Eyed Seeing in Primary Research Focused on Indigenous Health: A Scoping Review
title_short Applications of Two-Eyed Seeing in Primary Research Focused on Indigenous Health: A Scoping Review
title_full Applications of Two-Eyed Seeing in Primary Research Focused on Indigenous Health: A Scoping Review
title_fullStr Applications of Two-Eyed Seeing in Primary Research Focused on Indigenous Health: A Scoping Review
title_full_unstemmed Applications of Two-Eyed Seeing in Primary Research Focused on Indigenous Health: A Scoping Review
title_sort applications of two-eyed seeing in primary research focused on indigenous health: a scoping review
publisher SAGE Journals
publishDate 2020
url https://dx.doi.org/10.25384/sage.c.5020532
https://sage.figshare.com/collections/Applications_of_Two-Eyed_Seeing_in_Primary_Research_Focused_on_Indigenous_Health_A_Scoping_Review/5020532
geographic Canada
geographic_facet Canada
genre Mi’kmaq
genre_facet Mi’kmaq
op_relation https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1609406920929110
op_rights CC BY 4.0
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
op_rightsnorm CC-BY
op_doi https://doi.org/10.25384/sage.c.5020532
https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920929110
_version_ 1766069830152093696