Правовое положение шрузополучателя по договору воздушной перевозки груза

The article is devoted to the analysis of various approaches to the definition of a consignees legal status under an air shipment contract which have been suggested since the 1960s-1980s discussion till the present time. According to one of the viewpoints the given contract is considered bilateral....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Выгодянский А. В.
Format: Report
Language:unknown
Published: Актуальные проблемы российского права 2011
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dx.doi.org/10.24412/fdqym4-rxxa
https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/pravovoe-polozhenie-shruzopoluchatelya-po-dogovoru-vozdushnoy-perevozki-gruza
id ftdatacite:10.24412/fdqym4-rxxa
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdatacite:10.24412/fdqym4-rxxa 2023-05-15T18:47:14+02:00 Правовое положение шрузополучателя по договору воздушной перевозки груза Выгодянский А. В. 2011 https://dx.doi.org/10.24412/fdqym4-rxxa https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/pravovoe-polozhenie-shruzopoluchatelya-po-dogovoru-vozdushnoy-perevozki-gruza unknown Актуальные проблемы российского права CC BY https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 CC-BY ВОЗДУШНАЯ ПЕРЕВОЗКА ПРАВОВОЕ ПОЛОЖЕНИЕ ДОГОВОР ПЕРЕВОЗКИ ГРУЗА ГРУЗООТПРАВИТЕЛЬ ГРУЗОПОЛУЧАТЕЛЬ ПЕРЕВОЗЧИК Paper Text article-journal ScholarlyArticle 2011 ftdatacite https://doi.org/10.24412/fdqym4-rxxa 2021-11-05T12:55:41Z The article is devoted to the analysis of various approaches to the definition of a consignees legal status under an air shipment contract which have been suggested since the 1960s-1980s discussion till the present time. According to one of the viewpoints the given contract is considered bilateral. The consignor and the carrier are the parties to the contract, while the consignee is in the role of the third party with the contract being carried out for the benefit of the latter Proponents of this point of view consider the contract bilateral taking into account the fact that the consignee does not participate in either drawing the contract terms up or signing the contract but learn about the concluded contract from the carriers notice of cargo delivery to the address of the consignee. Those maintaining the opposite point of view qualify the contract as a trilateral one and consider the consignor, carrier and consignee full parties to the contract. According to them the Civil Code of the Russian Federation regulations determining a consignees legal status make it possible to set up under the contract only the rights for the third party, while a consignee is a party to not only rights but also certain obligations under the shipment contract. The author being an advocate of the second point of view presents the authors model of a trilateral contract of air cargo shipment as well as offers his own definition of such a contract which fixes certain obligations of a consignee. Report Перевозчик DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology)
institution Open Polar
collection DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology)
op_collection_id ftdatacite
language unknown
topic ВОЗДУШНАЯ ПЕРЕВОЗКА
ПРАВОВОЕ ПОЛОЖЕНИЕ
ДОГОВОР ПЕРЕВОЗКИ ГРУЗА
ГРУЗООТПРАВИТЕЛЬ
ГРУЗОПОЛУЧАТЕЛЬ
ПЕРЕВОЗЧИК
spellingShingle ВОЗДУШНАЯ ПЕРЕВОЗКА
ПРАВОВОЕ ПОЛОЖЕНИЕ
ДОГОВОР ПЕРЕВОЗКИ ГРУЗА
ГРУЗООТПРАВИТЕЛЬ
ГРУЗОПОЛУЧАТЕЛЬ
ПЕРЕВОЗЧИК
Выгодянский А. В.
Правовое положение шрузополучателя по договору воздушной перевозки груза
topic_facet ВОЗДУШНАЯ ПЕРЕВОЗКА
ПРАВОВОЕ ПОЛОЖЕНИЕ
ДОГОВОР ПЕРЕВОЗКИ ГРУЗА
ГРУЗООТПРАВИТЕЛЬ
ГРУЗОПОЛУЧАТЕЛЬ
ПЕРЕВОЗЧИК
description The article is devoted to the analysis of various approaches to the definition of a consignees legal status under an air shipment contract which have been suggested since the 1960s-1980s discussion till the present time. According to one of the viewpoints the given contract is considered bilateral. The consignor and the carrier are the parties to the contract, while the consignee is in the role of the third party with the contract being carried out for the benefit of the latter Proponents of this point of view consider the contract bilateral taking into account the fact that the consignee does not participate in either drawing the contract terms up or signing the contract but learn about the concluded contract from the carriers notice of cargo delivery to the address of the consignee. Those maintaining the opposite point of view qualify the contract as a trilateral one and consider the consignor, carrier and consignee full parties to the contract. According to them the Civil Code of the Russian Federation regulations determining a consignees legal status make it possible to set up under the contract only the rights for the third party, while a consignee is a party to not only rights but also certain obligations under the shipment contract. The author being an advocate of the second point of view presents the authors model of a trilateral contract of air cargo shipment as well as offers his own definition of such a contract which fixes certain obligations of a consignee.
format Report
author Выгодянский А. В.
author_facet Выгодянский А. В.
author_sort Выгодянский А. В.
title Правовое положение шрузополучателя по договору воздушной перевозки груза
title_short Правовое положение шрузополучателя по договору воздушной перевозки груза
title_full Правовое положение шрузополучателя по договору воздушной перевозки груза
title_fullStr Правовое положение шрузополучателя по договору воздушной перевозки груза
title_full_unstemmed Правовое положение шрузополучателя по договору воздушной перевозки груза
title_sort правовое положение шрузополучателя по договору воздушной перевозки груза
publisher Актуальные проблемы российского права
publishDate 2011
url https://dx.doi.org/10.24412/fdqym4-rxxa
https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/pravovoe-polozhenie-shruzopoluchatelya-po-dogovoru-vozdushnoy-perevozki-gruza
genre Перевозчик
genre_facet Перевозчик
op_rights CC BY
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
op_rightsnorm CC-BY
op_doi https://doi.org/10.24412/fdqym4-rxxa
_version_ 1766239199826018304