D5.2 - Jet drilling at simulated reservoir conditions

Deliverable D5.2 presents the experimental outcome of jetting experiments at simulated reservoir conditions. Different rock types are tested under various conditions with the use of three different types of test bench. At first jetting experiments are conducted under submerged conditions in order to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hahn, Simon, Wittig, Volker, Jasper, Sarah, Schwarz, Dennis, Albadroui, Dhafir, Hoogland, Koos, Bakker, Richard
Format: Report
Language:English
Published: GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dx.doi.org/10.2312/gfz.4.8.2019.002
https://gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_5002026
id ftdatacite:10.2312/gfz.4.8.2019.002
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdatacite:10.2312/gfz.4.8.2019.002 2023-05-15T16:53:07+02:00 D5.2 - Jet drilling at simulated reservoir conditions Hahn, Simon Wittig, Volker Jasper, Sarah Schwarz, Dennis Albadroui, Dhafir Hoogland, Koos Bakker, Richard 2019 https://dx.doi.org/10.2312/gfz.4.8.2019.002 https://gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_5002026 en eng GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode cc-by-4.0 CC-BY Text Report report ScholarlyArticle 2019 ftdatacite https://doi.org/10.2312/gfz.4.8.2019.002 2021-11-05T12:55:41Z Deliverable D5.2 presents the experimental outcome of jetting experiments at simulated reservoir conditions. Different rock types are tested under various conditions with the use of three different types of test bench. At first jetting experiments are conducted under submerged conditions in order to derive a better understanding of the governing erosion mechanism. Therefore pitting tests are combined with PIV measurements in order to derive and explain the erosion pattern of the occurring cavitation erosion and why the rock is more like to be eroded by the stagnation pressure of the impinging jet. Second, jetting experiments under pressure controlled conditions are performed. Rate of penetrations (ROP) of up to 100 m/h can be achieved which proofs the successful application of RJD technology especially in sand stone reservoir rock types. Especially the rotating nozzle design bears the highest potential for jetting operations where the static nozzle designs tend to fail, especially when pore pressure increases. The third experimental series under application of a bi- axial stress field show that the current RJD technology, as being used by project partner WSG, is not able to penetrate harder sandstone rock types (e.g. Dortmund sandstone) when field operating conditions are applied. The induced stress in the specimen does not initiate or enhance ROP. A second experiment thereby shows that higher nozzle exit speeds can lead to massive breakouts. Fourth, experiments are performed under a tri-axial stress field in collaboration with TU DELFT. Rock cubes are tested under different and very severely stress regimes while jetting into them. Compared to tests at atmospheric conditions it can be stated that the application of a stress field does not enhance the erosion of rock. At last experiments are conducted with the project partner WSG in order to determine the jetability of the Icelandic Basalt rock type and Icelandic inter basalt sediment layer. The experiments show that already higher pump pressures result in higher jetting performance, hence making them jetable as previously not expected. Furthermore the experiments approved the feasibility of the planned field test in Iceland when the soft sediment layer is the target zone. All in all the experiments conducted with the RJD technology show different results at simulated reservoir conditions compared to those at atmospheric which are described in deliverable D5.1 (Hahn & Wittig, 2017). Therefor, further testing at conditions representing the reservoir conditions more closer are needed in order to better understand and analyze the jetting process downhole. Report Iceland DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology) Nozzle ENVELOPE(159.100,159.100,-79.917,-79.917)
institution Open Polar
collection DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology)
op_collection_id ftdatacite
language English
description Deliverable D5.2 presents the experimental outcome of jetting experiments at simulated reservoir conditions. Different rock types are tested under various conditions with the use of three different types of test bench. At first jetting experiments are conducted under submerged conditions in order to derive a better understanding of the governing erosion mechanism. Therefore pitting tests are combined with PIV measurements in order to derive and explain the erosion pattern of the occurring cavitation erosion and why the rock is more like to be eroded by the stagnation pressure of the impinging jet. Second, jetting experiments under pressure controlled conditions are performed. Rate of penetrations (ROP) of up to 100 m/h can be achieved which proofs the successful application of RJD technology especially in sand stone reservoir rock types. Especially the rotating nozzle design bears the highest potential for jetting operations where the static nozzle designs tend to fail, especially when pore pressure increases. The third experimental series under application of a bi- axial stress field show that the current RJD technology, as being used by project partner WSG, is not able to penetrate harder sandstone rock types (e.g. Dortmund sandstone) when field operating conditions are applied. The induced stress in the specimen does not initiate or enhance ROP. A second experiment thereby shows that higher nozzle exit speeds can lead to massive breakouts. Fourth, experiments are performed under a tri-axial stress field in collaboration with TU DELFT. Rock cubes are tested under different and very severely stress regimes while jetting into them. Compared to tests at atmospheric conditions it can be stated that the application of a stress field does not enhance the erosion of rock. At last experiments are conducted with the project partner WSG in order to determine the jetability of the Icelandic Basalt rock type and Icelandic inter basalt sediment layer. The experiments show that already higher pump pressures result in higher jetting performance, hence making them jetable as previously not expected. Furthermore the experiments approved the feasibility of the planned field test in Iceland when the soft sediment layer is the target zone. All in all the experiments conducted with the RJD technology show different results at simulated reservoir conditions compared to those at atmospheric which are described in deliverable D5.1 (Hahn & Wittig, 2017). Therefor, further testing at conditions representing the reservoir conditions more closer are needed in order to better understand and analyze the jetting process downhole.
format Report
author Hahn, Simon
Wittig, Volker
Jasper, Sarah
Schwarz, Dennis
Albadroui, Dhafir
Hoogland, Koos
Bakker, Richard
spellingShingle Hahn, Simon
Wittig, Volker
Jasper, Sarah
Schwarz, Dennis
Albadroui, Dhafir
Hoogland, Koos
Bakker, Richard
D5.2 - Jet drilling at simulated reservoir conditions
author_facet Hahn, Simon
Wittig, Volker
Jasper, Sarah
Schwarz, Dennis
Albadroui, Dhafir
Hoogland, Koos
Bakker, Richard
author_sort Hahn, Simon
title D5.2 - Jet drilling at simulated reservoir conditions
title_short D5.2 - Jet drilling at simulated reservoir conditions
title_full D5.2 - Jet drilling at simulated reservoir conditions
title_fullStr D5.2 - Jet drilling at simulated reservoir conditions
title_full_unstemmed D5.2 - Jet drilling at simulated reservoir conditions
title_sort d5.2 - jet drilling at simulated reservoir conditions
publisher GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences
publishDate 2019
url https://dx.doi.org/10.2312/gfz.4.8.2019.002
https://gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_5002026
long_lat ENVELOPE(159.100,159.100,-79.917,-79.917)
geographic Nozzle
geographic_facet Nozzle
genre Iceland
genre_facet Iceland
op_rights Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
cc-by-4.0
op_rightsnorm CC-BY
op_doi https://doi.org/10.2312/gfz.4.8.2019.002
_version_ 1766043639330373632