Norway House: Economic Opportunity and the Rise of Community, 1825-1844.

This dissertation argues that the Hudson’s Bay Company depot that was built at Norway House beginning in 1825 created economic opportunities that were sufficiently strong to draw Aboriginal people to the site in such numbers that, within a decade of its establishment, the post was the locus of a thr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: McKillip, James D.
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: Université d'Ottawa / University of Ottawa 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dx.doi.org/10.20381/ruor-5133
http://www.ruor.uottawa.ca/handle/10393/20520
id ftdatacite:10.20381/ruor-5133
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdatacite:10.20381/ruor-5133 2023-05-15T17:12:20+02:00 Norway House: Economic Opportunity and the Rise of Community, 1825-1844. McKillip, James D. 2012 https://dx.doi.org/10.20381/ruor-5133 http://www.ruor.uottawa.ca/handle/10393/20520 en eng Université d'Ottawa / University of Ottawa fur trade Rupert's Land micro-history western Canada colonialism British Empire Canadian Aboriginal Metis Hudson's Bay Company economic history Text Thesis article-journal ScholarlyArticle 2012 ftdatacite https://doi.org/10.20381/ruor-5133 2021-11-05T12:55:41Z This dissertation argues that the Hudson’s Bay Company depot that was built at Norway House beginning in 1825 created economic opportunities that were sufficiently strong to draw Aboriginal people to the site in such numbers that, within a decade of its establishment, the post was the locus of a thriving community. This was in spite of the lack of any significant trade in furs, in spite of the absence of an existing Aboriginal community on which to expand and in spite of the very small number of Hudson’s Bay Company personnel assigned to the post on a permanent basis. Although economic factors were not the only reason for the development of Norway House as a community, these factors were almost certainly primus inter pares of the various influences in that development. This study also offers a new framework for the conception and construction of community based on documenting day-to-day activities that were themselves behavioural reflections of intentionality and choice. Interpretation of these behaviours is possible by combining a variety of approaches and methodologies, some qualitative and some quantitative. By closely counting and analyzing data in archival records that were collected by fur trade agents in the course of their normal duties, it is possible to measure the importance of various activities such as construction, fishing and hunting. With a clear understanding of what people were actually doing, it is possible to interpret their intentions in the absence of explicit documentary evidence. Thesis Metis DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology) Canada Norway
institution Open Polar
collection DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology)
op_collection_id ftdatacite
language English
topic fur trade
Rupert's Land
micro-history
western Canada
colonialism
British Empire
Canadian Aboriginal
Metis
Hudson's Bay Company
economic history
spellingShingle fur trade
Rupert's Land
micro-history
western Canada
colonialism
British Empire
Canadian Aboriginal
Metis
Hudson's Bay Company
economic history
McKillip, James D.
Norway House: Economic Opportunity and the Rise of Community, 1825-1844.
topic_facet fur trade
Rupert's Land
micro-history
western Canada
colonialism
British Empire
Canadian Aboriginal
Metis
Hudson's Bay Company
economic history
description This dissertation argues that the Hudson’s Bay Company depot that was built at Norway House beginning in 1825 created economic opportunities that were sufficiently strong to draw Aboriginal people to the site in such numbers that, within a decade of its establishment, the post was the locus of a thriving community. This was in spite of the lack of any significant trade in furs, in spite of the absence of an existing Aboriginal community on which to expand and in spite of the very small number of Hudson’s Bay Company personnel assigned to the post on a permanent basis. Although economic factors were not the only reason for the development of Norway House as a community, these factors were almost certainly primus inter pares of the various influences in that development. This study also offers a new framework for the conception and construction of community based on documenting day-to-day activities that were themselves behavioural reflections of intentionality and choice. Interpretation of these behaviours is possible by combining a variety of approaches and methodologies, some qualitative and some quantitative. By closely counting and analyzing data in archival records that were collected by fur trade agents in the course of their normal duties, it is possible to measure the importance of various activities such as construction, fishing and hunting. With a clear understanding of what people were actually doing, it is possible to interpret their intentions in the absence of explicit documentary evidence.
format Thesis
author McKillip, James D.
author_facet McKillip, James D.
author_sort McKillip, James D.
title Norway House: Economic Opportunity and the Rise of Community, 1825-1844.
title_short Norway House: Economic Opportunity and the Rise of Community, 1825-1844.
title_full Norway House: Economic Opportunity and the Rise of Community, 1825-1844.
title_fullStr Norway House: Economic Opportunity and the Rise of Community, 1825-1844.
title_full_unstemmed Norway House: Economic Opportunity and the Rise of Community, 1825-1844.
title_sort norway house: economic opportunity and the rise of community, 1825-1844.
publisher Université d'Ottawa / University of Ottawa
publishDate 2012
url https://dx.doi.org/10.20381/ruor-5133
http://www.ruor.uottawa.ca/handle/10393/20520
geographic Canada
Norway
geographic_facet Canada
Norway
genre Metis
genre_facet Metis
op_doi https://doi.org/10.20381/ruor-5133
_version_ 1766069126211567616