Science, Technology and International Collaboration, 1999

This survey was set up and completed as a collaboration project between scientists at The School of Marine Affairs, The University of Washington, Fridtjof Nansen Institute and the University of Oslo, Department of Political Science. The project arouse from a common interest in more precise knowledge...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Underdal, Arild
Format: Dataset
Language:unknown
Published: NSD – Norwegian Centre for Research Data 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dx.doi.org/10.18712/nsd-nsd1702-v1
http://search.nsd.no/study/NSD1702/?version=1
id ftdatacite:10.18712/nsd-nsd1702-v1
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdatacite:10.18712/nsd-nsd1702-v1 2023-05-15T13:59:05+02:00 Science, Technology and International Collaboration, 1999 Underdal, Arild 2016 https://dx.doi.org/10.18712/nsd-nsd1702-v1 http://search.nsd.no/study/NSD1702/?version=1 unknown NSD – Norwegian Centre for Research Data Politics Government, political systems and organisations International politics and organisations dataset Dataset 2016 ftdatacite https://doi.org/10.18712/nsd-nsd1702-v1 2022-02-08T13:40:45Z This survey was set up and completed as a collaboration project between scientists at The School of Marine Affairs, The University of Washington, Fridtjof Nansen Institute and the University of Oslo, Department of Political Science. The project arouse from a common interest in more precise knowledge about why some international regimes “succeed” while others “fail”. The study was based on two explanations. One of them seeks the answer in characteristics of the problem the regimes are going to solve. The other seeks the answer in characteristics of the institutions and systems that deals with the problem. The assumption here is that some institutions and systems have a greater capacity than others to solve particular types of problems. The study then attempted to specify each of these theses in a set of more precise hypotheses, and tested this against the empirical material. The database provides information about fourteen international regimes and variance in regime effectiveness. The regimes included dealt with the following list of issue-areas: Satellite telecommunication, nuclear non-proliferation, dumping of low-level radioactive waste at sea, ship-generated oil pollution, marine pollution in the Northeast Atlantic: Oslo Dumping Convention, Marine Pollution in the Northeast Atlantic: The Paris Convention, Marine Pollution in the Mediterranean: The Barcelona Convention, Long Range Transboundary Air Pollution (LRTAP), Stratospheric ozone depletion, international trade in endangered species (CITES), International Whaling (IWC), high seas salmon fisheries in the North Pacific (INPFC), Antarctic resources (CCAMLR) and South Pacific tuna fisheries (FFA). Dataset Antarc* Antarctic Fridtjof Nansen Northeast Atlantic DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology) Antarctic Fridtjof ENVELOPE(-56.717,-56.717,-63.567,-63.567) Pacific
institution Open Polar
collection DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology)
op_collection_id ftdatacite
language unknown
topic Politics
Government, political systems and organisations
International politics and organisations
spellingShingle Politics
Government, political systems and organisations
International politics and organisations
Underdal, Arild
Science, Technology and International Collaboration, 1999
topic_facet Politics
Government, political systems and organisations
International politics and organisations
description This survey was set up and completed as a collaboration project between scientists at The School of Marine Affairs, The University of Washington, Fridtjof Nansen Institute and the University of Oslo, Department of Political Science. The project arouse from a common interest in more precise knowledge about why some international regimes “succeed” while others “fail”. The study was based on two explanations. One of them seeks the answer in characteristics of the problem the regimes are going to solve. The other seeks the answer in characteristics of the institutions and systems that deals with the problem. The assumption here is that some institutions and systems have a greater capacity than others to solve particular types of problems. The study then attempted to specify each of these theses in a set of more precise hypotheses, and tested this against the empirical material. The database provides information about fourteen international regimes and variance in regime effectiveness. The regimes included dealt with the following list of issue-areas: Satellite telecommunication, nuclear non-proliferation, dumping of low-level radioactive waste at sea, ship-generated oil pollution, marine pollution in the Northeast Atlantic: Oslo Dumping Convention, Marine Pollution in the Northeast Atlantic: The Paris Convention, Marine Pollution in the Mediterranean: The Barcelona Convention, Long Range Transboundary Air Pollution (LRTAP), Stratospheric ozone depletion, international trade in endangered species (CITES), International Whaling (IWC), high seas salmon fisheries in the North Pacific (INPFC), Antarctic resources (CCAMLR) and South Pacific tuna fisheries (FFA).
format Dataset
author Underdal, Arild
author_facet Underdal, Arild
author_sort Underdal, Arild
title Science, Technology and International Collaboration, 1999
title_short Science, Technology and International Collaboration, 1999
title_full Science, Technology and International Collaboration, 1999
title_fullStr Science, Technology and International Collaboration, 1999
title_full_unstemmed Science, Technology and International Collaboration, 1999
title_sort science, technology and international collaboration, 1999
publisher NSD – Norwegian Centre for Research Data
publishDate 2016
url https://dx.doi.org/10.18712/nsd-nsd1702-v1
http://search.nsd.no/study/NSD1702/?version=1
long_lat ENVELOPE(-56.717,-56.717,-63.567,-63.567)
geographic Antarctic
Fridtjof
Pacific
geographic_facet Antarctic
Fridtjof
Pacific
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
Fridtjof Nansen
Northeast Atlantic
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
Fridtjof Nansen
Northeast Atlantic
op_doi https://doi.org/10.18712/nsd-nsd1702-v1
_version_ 1766267465565732864