Artificial persons and attributed actions: How to interpret action-sentences about states ...

Action-sentences about states, such as ‘North Korea conducted a nuclear test’, are ubiquitous in discourse about international relations. Although there has been a great deal of debate in International Relations about whether states are agents or actors, the question of how to interpret action-sente...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Fleming, Sean
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dx.doi.org/10.17863/cam.6755
https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/261559
id ftdatacite:10.17863/cam.6755
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdatacite:10.17863/cam.6755 2023-05-15T17:22:26+02:00 Artificial persons and attributed actions: How to interpret action-sentences about states ... Fleming, Sean 2017 https://dx.doi.org/10.17863/cam.6755 https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/261559 en eng Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository agent–structure problem corporate agency Hobbes metaphor ontology state personhood Article ScholarlyArticle article-journal Text 2017 ftdatacite https://doi.org/10.17863/cam.6755 2023-04-03T12:55:57Z Action-sentences about states, such as ‘North Korea conducted a nuclear test’, are ubiquitous in discourse about international relations. Although there has been a great deal of debate in International Relations about whether states are agents or actors, the question of how to interpret action-sentences about states has been treated as secondary or epiphenomenal. This article focuses on our practices of speaking and writing about the state rather than the ontology of the state. It uses Hobbes’ theory of attributed action to develop a typology of action-sentences and to analyse action-sentences about states. These sentences are not shorthand for action-sentences about individuals, as proponents of the metaphorical interpretation suggest. Nor do they describe the actions of singular agents, as proponents of the literal interpretation suggest. The central argument is that action-sentences about states are ‘attributive’, much like sentences about principals who act vicariously through agents: they identify the ... : This research was funded by a Doctoral Fellowship (752-2015-0050) from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; a Rothermere Fellowship from the Rothermere Foundation; and a J.W. Pickersgill Fellowship from the Government of Newfoundland and Labrador. ... Text Newfoundland DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology) Canada Newfoundland
institution Open Polar
collection DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology)
op_collection_id ftdatacite
language English
topic agent–structure problem
corporate agency
Hobbes
metaphor
ontology
state personhood
spellingShingle agent–structure problem
corporate agency
Hobbes
metaphor
ontology
state personhood
Fleming, Sean
Artificial persons and attributed actions: How to interpret action-sentences about states ...
topic_facet agent–structure problem
corporate agency
Hobbes
metaphor
ontology
state personhood
description Action-sentences about states, such as ‘North Korea conducted a nuclear test’, are ubiquitous in discourse about international relations. Although there has been a great deal of debate in International Relations about whether states are agents or actors, the question of how to interpret action-sentences about states has been treated as secondary or epiphenomenal. This article focuses on our practices of speaking and writing about the state rather than the ontology of the state. It uses Hobbes’ theory of attributed action to develop a typology of action-sentences and to analyse action-sentences about states. These sentences are not shorthand for action-sentences about individuals, as proponents of the metaphorical interpretation suggest. Nor do they describe the actions of singular agents, as proponents of the literal interpretation suggest. The central argument is that action-sentences about states are ‘attributive’, much like sentences about principals who act vicariously through agents: they identify the ... : This research was funded by a Doctoral Fellowship (752-2015-0050) from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; a Rothermere Fellowship from the Rothermere Foundation; and a J.W. Pickersgill Fellowship from the Government of Newfoundland and Labrador. ...
format Text
author Fleming, Sean
author_facet Fleming, Sean
author_sort Fleming, Sean
title Artificial persons and attributed actions: How to interpret action-sentences about states ...
title_short Artificial persons and attributed actions: How to interpret action-sentences about states ...
title_full Artificial persons and attributed actions: How to interpret action-sentences about states ...
title_fullStr Artificial persons and attributed actions: How to interpret action-sentences about states ...
title_full_unstemmed Artificial persons and attributed actions: How to interpret action-sentences about states ...
title_sort artificial persons and attributed actions: how to interpret action-sentences about states ...
publisher Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository
publishDate 2017
url https://dx.doi.org/10.17863/cam.6755
https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/261559
geographic Canada
Newfoundland
geographic_facet Canada
Newfoundland
genre Newfoundland
genre_facet Newfoundland
op_doi https://doi.org/10.17863/cam.6755
_version_ 1766109078915907584