Criterion validity of two physical activity and one sedentary time questionnaire against accelerometry in a large cohort of adults and older adults.
Objectives:We compared the ability of physical activity and sitting time questionnaires (PAQ) for ranking individuals versus continuous volume calculations (physical activity level (PAL), metabolic equivalents of task (MET), sitting hours) against accelerometry measured physical activity as our crit...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Text |
Language: | unknown |
Published: |
Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository
2020
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://dx.doi.org/10.17863/cam.51359 https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/304278 |
id |
ftdatacite:10.17863/cam.51359 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftdatacite:10.17863/cam.51359 2023-05-15T18:34:48+02:00 Criterion validity of two physical activity and one sedentary time questionnaire against accelerometry in a large cohort of adults and older adults. Sagelv, Edvard H Hopstock, Laila A Johansson, Jonas Hansen, Bjørge H Brage, Soren Horsch, Alexander Ekelund, Ulf Morseth, Bente 2020 https://dx.doi.org/10.17863/cam.51359 https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/304278 unknown Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 CC-BY-NC Medicine epidemiology Physical Activity Accelerometer Sitting Time Text Article article-journal ScholarlyArticle 2020 ftdatacite https://doi.org/10.17863/cam.51359 2021-11-05T12:55:41Z Objectives:We compared the ability of physical activity and sitting time questionnaires (PAQ) for ranking individuals versus continuous volume calculations (physical activity level (PAL), metabolic equivalents of task (MET), sitting hours) against accelerometry measured physical activity as our criterion. Methods:Participants in a cohort from the Tromsø Study completed three questionnaires; (1) The Saltin-Grimby Physical Activity Level Scale (SGPALS) (n=4040); (2) The Physical Activity Frequency, Intensity and Duration (PAFID) questionnaire (n=5902)) calculated as MET-hours·week-1 and (3) The International Physical Activity questionnaire (IPAQ) short-form sitting question (n=4896). We validated the questionnaires against the following accelerometry (Actigraph wGT3X-BT) estimates: vector magnitude counts per minute, steps∙day-1, time (minutes·day-1) in sedentary behaviour, light physical activity, moderate and vigorous physical activity (MVPA) non-bouted and ≥10 min bouted MVPA. Results:Ranking of physical activity according to the SGPALS and quartiles (Q) of MET-hours∙week-1 from the PAFID were both positively associated with accelerometry estimates of physical activity (p<0.001) but correlations with accelerometry estimates were weak (SGPALS (PAL): r=0.11 to 0.26, p<0.001) and weak-to-moderate (PAFID: r=0.39 to 0.44, p<0.01). There was 1 hour of accelerometry measured sedentary time from Q1 to Q4 in the IPAQ sitting question (p<0.001) and also weak correlations (r=0.22, p<0.01). Conclusion:Ranking of physical activity levels measured with PAQs appears to have higher validity than energy expenditure calculations. Self-reported sedentary time poorly reflects accelerometry measured sedentary time. These two PAQs can be used for ranking individuals into different physical activity categories supporting previous studies using these instruments when assessing associations with health outcomes. Text Tromsø DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology) Tromsø |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology) |
op_collection_id |
ftdatacite |
language |
unknown |
topic |
Medicine epidemiology Physical Activity Accelerometer Sitting Time |
spellingShingle |
Medicine epidemiology Physical Activity Accelerometer Sitting Time Sagelv, Edvard H Hopstock, Laila A Johansson, Jonas Hansen, Bjørge H Brage, Soren Horsch, Alexander Ekelund, Ulf Morseth, Bente Criterion validity of two physical activity and one sedentary time questionnaire against accelerometry in a large cohort of adults and older adults. |
topic_facet |
Medicine epidemiology Physical Activity Accelerometer Sitting Time |
description |
Objectives:We compared the ability of physical activity and sitting time questionnaires (PAQ) for ranking individuals versus continuous volume calculations (physical activity level (PAL), metabolic equivalents of task (MET), sitting hours) against accelerometry measured physical activity as our criterion. Methods:Participants in a cohort from the Tromsø Study completed three questionnaires; (1) The Saltin-Grimby Physical Activity Level Scale (SGPALS) (n=4040); (2) The Physical Activity Frequency, Intensity and Duration (PAFID) questionnaire (n=5902)) calculated as MET-hours·week-1 and (3) The International Physical Activity questionnaire (IPAQ) short-form sitting question (n=4896). We validated the questionnaires against the following accelerometry (Actigraph wGT3X-BT) estimates: vector magnitude counts per minute, steps∙day-1, time (minutes·day-1) in sedentary behaviour, light physical activity, moderate and vigorous physical activity (MVPA) non-bouted and ≥10 min bouted MVPA. Results:Ranking of physical activity according to the SGPALS and quartiles (Q) of MET-hours∙week-1 from the PAFID were both positively associated with accelerometry estimates of physical activity (p<0.001) but correlations with accelerometry estimates were weak (SGPALS (PAL): r=0.11 to 0.26, p<0.001) and weak-to-moderate (PAFID: r=0.39 to 0.44, p<0.01). There was 1 hour of accelerometry measured sedentary time from Q1 to Q4 in the IPAQ sitting question (p<0.001) and also weak correlations (r=0.22, p<0.01). Conclusion:Ranking of physical activity levels measured with PAQs appears to have higher validity than energy expenditure calculations. Self-reported sedentary time poorly reflects accelerometry measured sedentary time. These two PAQs can be used for ranking individuals into different physical activity categories supporting previous studies using these instruments when assessing associations with health outcomes. |
format |
Text |
author |
Sagelv, Edvard H Hopstock, Laila A Johansson, Jonas Hansen, Bjørge H Brage, Soren Horsch, Alexander Ekelund, Ulf Morseth, Bente |
author_facet |
Sagelv, Edvard H Hopstock, Laila A Johansson, Jonas Hansen, Bjørge H Brage, Soren Horsch, Alexander Ekelund, Ulf Morseth, Bente |
author_sort |
Sagelv, Edvard H |
title |
Criterion validity of two physical activity and one sedentary time questionnaire against accelerometry in a large cohort of adults and older adults. |
title_short |
Criterion validity of two physical activity and one sedentary time questionnaire against accelerometry in a large cohort of adults and older adults. |
title_full |
Criterion validity of two physical activity and one sedentary time questionnaire against accelerometry in a large cohort of adults and older adults. |
title_fullStr |
Criterion validity of two physical activity and one sedentary time questionnaire against accelerometry in a large cohort of adults and older adults. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Criterion validity of two physical activity and one sedentary time questionnaire against accelerometry in a large cohort of adults and older adults. |
title_sort |
criterion validity of two physical activity and one sedentary time questionnaire against accelerometry in a large cohort of adults and older adults. |
publisher |
Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository |
publishDate |
2020 |
url |
https://dx.doi.org/10.17863/cam.51359 https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/304278 |
geographic |
Tromsø |
geographic_facet |
Tromsø |
genre |
Tromsø |
genre_facet |
Tromsø |
op_rights |
Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
op_rightsnorm |
CC-BY-NC |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.17863/cam.51359 |
_version_ |
1766219717266112512 |