Utilizing existing legal frameworks to implement fisheries management in the arctic

As climate change contributes to accelerated melting of sea ice in the Arctic Ocean, areas that were previously off-limits to fishing will become accessible. While there are currently no internationally-agreed fishing regulations in the high seas of the Arctic, there is an effective moratorium on co...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: , OCTO
Format: Report
Language:unknown
Published: MarXiv 2018
Subjects:
Law
Online Access:https://dx.doi.org/10.17605/osf.io/hrb8g
https://marxiv.org/hrb8g/
id ftdatacite:10.17605/osf.io/hrb8g
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdatacite:10.17605/osf.io/hrb8g 2023-05-15T14:33:13+02:00 Utilizing existing legal frameworks to implement fisheries management in the arctic , OCTO 2018 https://dx.doi.org/10.17605/osf.io/hrb8g https://marxiv.org/hrb8g/ unknown MarXiv Other Law FOS Law Environmental Law Preprint Text article-journal ScholarlyArticle 2018 ftdatacite https://doi.org/10.17605/osf.io/hrb8g 2021-11-05T12:55:41Z As climate change contributes to accelerated melting of sea ice in the Arctic Ocean, areas that were previously off-limits to fishing will become accessible. While there are currently no internationally-agreed fishing regulations in the high seas of the Arctic, there is an effective moratorium on commercial fishing thanks to the non-binding “Oslo Declaration” (Declaration concerning the Prevention of Unregulated High Seas Fishing in the Central Arctic Ocean, from July 2015). The author investigates existing legal mechanisms which could be used to regulate an international Arctic fishery should commercial fishing begin.Currently, the Arctic Five (Canada, Denmark/Greenland, Norway, the Russian Federation, and the United States) plus Five (Iceland, the EU, China, South Korea, and Japan) are negotiating an agreement for fisheries management in the Central Arctic Ocean. The draft text, which has not reached consensus yet*, surprisingly does not seek to establish a regional fisheries management organization for this area. But, the Arctic 5 + 5 have agreed “to continue the moratorium on fishing on the high seas of Central Arctic until there is scientific evidence concerning sustainable fishing in the area.”The draft agreement further states, “the parties shall take measures consistent with international law to deter the activities of vessels entitled to fly the flags of non-parties that undermine the effective implementation of this Agreement.” But what measures ‘consistent with international law’ could member states adopt? Report Arctic Arctic Ocean Central Arctic Climate change Greenland Iceland Sea ice DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology) Arctic Arctic Ocean Canada Greenland Norway
institution Open Polar
collection DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology)
op_collection_id ftdatacite
language unknown
topic Law
FOS Law
Environmental Law
spellingShingle Law
FOS Law
Environmental Law
, OCTO
Utilizing existing legal frameworks to implement fisheries management in the arctic
topic_facet Law
FOS Law
Environmental Law
description As climate change contributes to accelerated melting of sea ice in the Arctic Ocean, areas that were previously off-limits to fishing will become accessible. While there are currently no internationally-agreed fishing regulations in the high seas of the Arctic, there is an effective moratorium on commercial fishing thanks to the non-binding “Oslo Declaration” (Declaration concerning the Prevention of Unregulated High Seas Fishing in the Central Arctic Ocean, from July 2015). The author investigates existing legal mechanisms which could be used to regulate an international Arctic fishery should commercial fishing begin.Currently, the Arctic Five (Canada, Denmark/Greenland, Norway, the Russian Federation, and the United States) plus Five (Iceland, the EU, China, South Korea, and Japan) are negotiating an agreement for fisheries management in the Central Arctic Ocean. The draft text, which has not reached consensus yet*, surprisingly does not seek to establish a regional fisheries management organization for this area. But, the Arctic 5 + 5 have agreed “to continue the moratorium on fishing on the high seas of Central Arctic until there is scientific evidence concerning sustainable fishing in the area.”The draft agreement further states, “the parties shall take measures consistent with international law to deter the activities of vessels entitled to fly the flags of non-parties that undermine the effective implementation of this Agreement.” But what measures ‘consistent with international law’ could member states adopt?
format Report
author , OCTO
author_facet , OCTO
author_sort , OCTO
title Utilizing existing legal frameworks to implement fisheries management in the arctic
title_short Utilizing existing legal frameworks to implement fisheries management in the arctic
title_full Utilizing existing legal frameworks to implement fisheries management in the arctic
title_fullStr Utilizing existing legal frameworks to implement fisheries management in the arctic
title_full_unstemmed Utilizing existing legal frameworks to implement fisheries management in the arctic
title_sort utilizing existing legal frameworks to implement fisheries management in the arctic
publisher MarXiv
publishDate 2018
url https://dx.doi.org/10.17605/osf.io/hrb8g
https://marxiv.org/hrb8g/
geographic Arctic
Arctic Ocean
Canada
Greenland
Norway
geographic_facet Arctic
Arctic Ocean
Canada
Greenland
Norway
genre Arctic
Arctic Ocean
Central Arctic
Climate change
Greenland
Iceland
Sea ice
genre_facet Arctic
Arctic Ocean
Central Arctic
Climate change
Greenland
Iceland
Sea ice
op_rights Other
op_doi https://doi.org/10.17605/osf.io/hrb8g
_version_ 1766306492679454720