Apatite fission track analytical data for samples from ODP Leg 152, supplement to: Clift, Peter D; Carter, Andrew; Hurford, Anthony J (1996): Constraints on the evolution of the East Greenland Margin: Evidence from detrital apatite in offshore sediments. Geology, 24(11), 1013-1016
We test a new approach to understanding the tectonic evolution of passive margins by using fission-track analysis on detrital apatites from sediments deposited offshore East Greenland. These apatites have not undergone postdepositional track annealing and therefore reflect provenance. The apatites p...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Dataset |
Language: | English |
Published: |
PANGAEA - Data Publisher for Earth & Environmental Science
1996
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://dx.doi.org/10.1594/pangaea.712923 https://doi.pangaea.de/10.1594/PANGAEA.712923 |
Summary: | We test a new approach to understanding the tectonic evolution of passive margins by using fission-track analysis on detrital apatites from sediments deposited offshore East Greenland. These apatites have not undergone postdepositional track annealing and therefore reflect provenance. The apatites preserve a component of the source rocks' thermal history that otherwise may not be retained within the present-day outcrop. Fission-track derived denudational histories from samples at Ocean Drilling Program drill sites offshore East Greenland at lat 63°N are compared with data from the onshore Singertat Complex. Previous apatite fission-track studies and geomorphic mapping of the East Greenland coast have shown that locally up to 6 km of denudation may have occurred, implying significant tectonic or magmatic activity starting as much as 30 m.y. after breakup at 56 Ma. In contrast, apatite fission-track data presented here record <2 km of Cenozoic denudation in southeast Greenland, probably driven by magmatic underplating at the time of breakup. Large-magnitude, postrift denudation of East Greenland is restricted to the area around Kangerdlugssuaq (68°N). The timing (<40-50 Ma) and magnitude are in accord with revised plume track models suggesting that the Iceland plume crossed the margin here during the late Eocene. |
---|