Practices of sovereignty : negotiated agreements, jurisdiction, and well-being for Heiltsuk Nation

Indigenous peoples would strongly deny the Crown ever possessed the power to extinguish their political rights at any point in history. On this view, the Canadian governments do not grant sovereignty to Indigenous peoples. Rather, sovereignty is their inherent right, which flows from ways of knowing...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Low, Margaret
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: University of British Columbia 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dx.doi.org/10.14288/1.0375642
https://doi.library.ubc.ca/10.14288/1.0375642
id ftdatacite:10.14288/1.0375642
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdatacite:10.14288/1.0375642 2023-05-15T16:15:49+02:00 Practices of sovereignty : negotiated agreements, jurisdiction, and well-being for Heiltsuk Nation Low, Margaret 2018 https://dx.doi.org/10.14288/1.0375642 https://doi.library.ubc.ca/10.14288/1.0375642 en eng University of British Columbia article-journal Text ScholarlyArticle 2018 ftdatacite https://doi.org/10.14288/1.0375642 2021-11-05T12:55:41Z Indigenous peoples would strongly deny the Crown ever possessed the power to extinguish their political rights at any point in history. On this view, the Canadian governments do not grant sovereignty to Indigenous peoples. Rather, sovereignty is their inherent right, which flows from ways of knowing and social and political systems that existed long before the arrival of European colonists. I have focused this dissertation on demonstrating the multiple ways in which Heiltsuk Nation practice sovereignty over their territory. Heiltsuk Territory spans 35,553 square kilometres of lands and waters and is located on the central coast of what is now known as British Columbia, Canada. My analysis focuses on practices of Indigenous sovereignty being expressed outside – though supported by – the courts, and specifically in the negotiation and implementation of “reconciliation agreements” between Heiltsuk Nation and the Province of British Columbia and the Government of Canada. Using qualitative data gathered through 2 years of ethnographic fieldwork, my dissertation traces the implications of negotiated agreements between Heiltsuk Nation and the federal and provincial governments, and finds these agreements have enabled new practices of sovereignty, assertions of jurisdiction, new conceptions of Indigenous well-being, and Indigenous-led efforts of reconciliation. Chapter 2 focuses on the implementation of the 2009 Coastal First Nations Reconciliation Protocol (2009 RPA) to explore how, through day-to-day political interactions, this agreement is operating as a mechanism that works to unsettle long-standing assumptions of Crown sovereignty. Chapter 3 documents the “on the ground” tensions arising from overlapping claims of jurisdictional authority in Heiltsuk territory, beginning from the inception of Coastal First Nations – a unique political alliance of several Nations – to the Land and Resource Management process (LRMP) in the early 2000s, through to the government-to-government process developed in response to the increasing legal authority of First Nations at the time. Chapter 4 critically engages colonial conceptions of “well-being” by focusing on the current wellbeing policies being implemented in coastal BC, and specifically in Heiltsuk territory. Chapter 5 illustrates efforts of Heiltsuk Nation to negotiate one of the first “reconciliation framework agreements” between an Indigenous nation and the Government of Canada. Text First Nations DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology) Canada British Columbia ENVELOPE(-125.003,-125.003,54.000,54.000)
institution Open Polar
collection DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology)
op_collection_id ftdatacite
language English
description Indigenous peoples would strongly deny the Crown ever possessed the power to extinguish their political rights at any point in history. On this view, the Canadian governments do not grant sovereignty to Indigenous peoples. Rather, sovereignty is their inherent right, which flows from ways of knowing and social and political systems that existed long before the arrival of European colonists. I have focused this dissertation on demonstrating the multiple ways in which Heiltsuk Nation practice sovereignty over their territory. Heiltsuk Territory spans 35,553 square kilometres of lands and waters and is located on the central coast of what is now known as British Columbia, Canada. My analysis focuses on practices of Indigenous sovereignty being expressed outside – though supported by – the courts, and specifically in the negotiation and implementation of “reconciliation agreements” between Heiltsuk Nation and the Province of British Columbia and the Government of Canada. Using qualitative data gathered through 2 years of ethnographic fieldwork, my dissertation traces the implications of negotiated agreements between Heiltsuk Nation and the federal and provincial governments, and finds these agreements have enabled new practices of sovereignty, assertions of jurisdiction, new conceptions of Indigenous well-being, and Indigenous-led efforts of reconciliation. Chapter 2 focuses on the implementation of the 2009 Coastal First Nations Reconciliation Protocol (2009 RPA) to explore how, through day-to-day political interactions, this agreement is operating as a mechanism that works to unsettle long-standing assumptions of Crown sovereignty. Chapter 3 documents the “on the ground” tensions arising from overlapping claims of jurisdictional authority in Heiltsuk territory, beginning from the inception of Coastal First Nations – a unique political alliance of several Nations – to the Land and Resource Management process (LRMP) in the early 2000s, through to the government-to-government process developed in response to the increasing legal authority of First Nations at the time. Chapter 4 critically engages colonial conceptions of “well-being” by focusing on the current wellbeing policies being implemented in coastal BC, and specifically in Heiltsuk territory. Chapter 5 illustrates efforts of Heiltsuk Nation to negotiate one of the first “reconciliation framework agreements” between an Indigenous nation and the Government of Canada.
format Text
author Low, Margaret
spellingShingle Low, Margaret
Practices of sovereignty : negotiated agreements, jurisdiction, and well-being for Heiltsuk Nation
author_facet Low, Margaret
author_sort Low, Margaret
title Practices of sovereignty : negotiated agreements, jurisdiction, and well-being for Heiltsuk Nation
title_short Practices of sovereignty : negotiated agreements, jurisdiction, and well-being for Heiltsuk Nation
title_full Practices of sovereignty : negotiated agreements, jurisdiction, and well-being for Heiltsuk Nation
title_fullStr Practices of sovereignty : negotiated agreements, jurisdiction, and well-being for Heiltsuk Nation
title_full_unstemmed Practices of sovereignty : negotiated agreements, jurisdiction, and well-being for Heiltsuk Nation
title_sort practices of sovereignty : negotiated agreements, jurisdiction, and well-being for heiltsuk nation
publisher University of British Columbia
publishDate 2018
url https://dx.doi.org/10.14288/1.0375642
https://doi.library.ubc.ca/10.14288/1.0375642
long_lat ENVELOPE(-125.003,-125.003,54.000,54.000)
geographic Canada
British Columbia
geographic_facet Canada
British Columbia
genre First Nations
genre_facet First Nations
op_doi https://doi.org/10.14288/1.0375642
_version_ 1766001692726263808