Whose input counts? : Evaluating the process and outcomes of public consultation through the BC Water Act Modernization ...

Public consultation has become an increasingly common form of democratic engagement. While critics have challenged the potential for public consultation to democratize policy-making due to existing power structures, few studies have undertaken a systematic evaluation of the policy outcomes of consul...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jollymore, Ashlee, McFarlane, Kiely, Harris, Leila
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: The University of British Columbia 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dx.doi.org/10.14288/1.0343255
https://doi.library.ubc.ca/10.14288/1.0343255
id ftdatacite:10.14288/1.0343255
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdatacite:10.14288/1.0343255 2024-04-28T08:19:06+00:00 Whose input counts? : Evaluating the process and outcomes of public consultation through the BC Water Act Modernization ... Jollymore, Ashlee McFarlane, Kiely Harris, Leila 2018 https://dx.doi.org/10.14288/1.0343255 https://doi.library.ubc.ca/10.14288/1.0343255 en eng The University of British Columbia https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2017.1282377 article-journal Text ScholarlyArticle 2018 ftdatacite https://doi.org/10.14288/1.034325510.1080/19460171.2017.1282377 2024-04-02T09:53:47Z Public consultation has become an increasingly common form of democratic engagement. While critics have challenged the potential for public consultation to democratize policy-making due to existing power structures, few studies have undertaken a systematic evaluation of the policy outcomes of consultation. This study combines qualitative and quantitative techniques to systematically analyze participants’ responses to policy proposals, and compare those responses with resulting policies. We utilized this approach to examine the large-scale public consultation process that informed the development of British Columbia’s new Water Sustainability Act (2014). Our analysis revealed: 1) barriers to effectual engagement, particularly for First Nations; 2) statistical differences in policy preferences between industry and non-industry groups; and 3) patterns in how these preferences align with policy outcomes, suggesting uneven participant influence on policy-making. This study highlights the importance of analyzing ... Text First Nations DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology)
institution Open Polar
collection DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology)
op_collection_id ftdatacite
language English
description Public consultation has become an increasingly common form of democratic engagement. While critics have challenged the potential for public consultation to democratize policy-making due to existing power structures, few studies have undertaken a systematic evaluation of the policy outcomes of consultation. This study combines qualitative and quantitative techniques to systematically analyze participants’ responses to policy proposals, and compare those responses with resulting policies. We utilized this approach to examine the large-scale public consultation process that informed the development of British Columbia’s new Water Sustainability Act (2014). Our analysis revealed: 1) barriers to effectual engagement, particularly for First Nations; 2) statistical differences in policy preferences between industry and non-industry groups; and 3) patterns in how these preferences align with policy outcomes, suggesting uneven participant influence on policy-making. This study highlights the importance of analyzing ...
format Text
author Jollymore, Ashlee
McFarlane, Kiely
Harris, Leila
spellingShingle Jollymore, Ashlee
McFarlane, Kiely
Harris, Leila
Whose input counts? : Evaluating the process and outcomes of public consultation through the BC Water Act Modernization ...
author_facet Jollymore, Ashlee
McFarlane, Kiely
Harris, Leila
author_sort Jollymore, Ashlee
title Whose input counts? : Evaluating the process and outcomes of public consultation through the BC Water Act Modernization ...
title_short Whose input counts? : Evaluating the process and outcomes of public consultation through the BC Water Act Modernization ...
title_full Whose input counts? : Evaluating the process and outcomes of public consultation through the BC Water Act Modernization ...
title_fullStr Whose input counts? : Evaluating the process and outcomes of public consultation through the BC Water Act Modernization ...
title_full_unstemmed Whose input counts? : Evaluating the process and outcomes of public consultation through the BC Water Act Modernization ...
title_sort whose input counts? : evaluating the process and outcomes of public consultation through the bc water act modernization ...
publisher The University of British Columbia
publishDate 2018
url https://dx.doi.org/10.14288/1.0343255
https://doi.library.ubc.ca/10.14288/1.0343255
genre First Nations
genre_facet First Nations
op_relation https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2017.1282377
op_doi https://doi.org/10.14288/1.034325510.1080/19460171.2017.1282377
_version_ 1797582781681762304