Nisgha syntax and the ergativity hypothesis ...
Nisgha has been classified by at least three different linguists as syntactically ergative (Rigsby, Rood, and Tarpent). This is motivated by the fact that in certain constructions the agent of a transitive verb patterns differently than the patient of the transitive or the single argument of an intr...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of British Columbia
2010
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://dx.doi.org/10.14288/1.0096319 https://doi.library.ubc.ca/10.14288/1.0096319 |
id |
ftdatacite:10.14288/1.0096319 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftdatacite:10.14288/1.0096319 2024-04-28T08:29:04+00:00 Nisgha syntax and the ergativity hypothesis ... Belvin, Robert S. 2010 https://dx.doi.org/10.14288/1.0096319 https://doi.library.ubc.ca/10.14288/1.0096319 en eng University of British Columbia article-journal Text ScholarlyArticle 2010 ftdatacite https://doi.org/10.14288/1.0096319 2024-04-02T09:38:10Z Nisgha has been classified by at least three different linguists as syntactically ergative (Rigsby, Rood, and Tarpent). This is motivated by the fact that in certain constructions the agent of a transitive verb patterns differently than the patient of the transitive or the single argument of an intransitive. A new definition of syntactic ergativity has been proposed recently by Alec Marantz (1981) and is called the Ergativity Hypothesis. The definition essentially says, given the grammatical functions [NP,VP] and [NP,S], we will have the following associations of grammatical functions and thematic roles: Syntactically Ergative Syntactically Accusative Language Language Agent-[NP,VP] Agent-[NP,S] Patient-[NP,S] Patient-[NP,VP] Morphological ergativity is considered a different phenomenon. It is essentially defined as follows (following the traditional definition): Morphologically ergative languages mark the subject of a transitive verb, and leave the object of a transitive and the single argument of an ... Text Nisgha DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology) |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology) |
op_collection_id |
ftdatacite |
language |
English |
description |
Nisgha has been classified by at least three different linguists as syntactically ergative (Rigsby, Rood, and Tarpent). This is motivated by the fact that in certain constructions the agent of a transitive verb patterns differently than the patient of the transitive or the single argument of an intransitive. A new definition of syntactic ergativity has been proposed recently by Alec Marantz (1981) and is called the Ergativity Hypothesis. The definition essentially says, given the grammatical functions [NP,VP] and [NP,S], we will have the following associations of grammatical functions and thematic roles: Syntactically Ergative Syntactically Accusative Language Language Agent-[NP,VP] Agent-[NP,S] Patient-[NP,S] Patient-[NP,VP] Morphological ergativity is considered a different phenomenon. It is essentially defined as follows (following the traditional definition): Morphologically ergative languages mark the subject of a transitive verb, and leave the object of a transitive and the single argument of an ... |
format |
Text |
author |
Belvin, Robert S. |
spellingShingle |
Belvin, Robert S. Nisgha syntax and the ergativity hypothesis ... |
author_facet |
Belvin, Robert S. |
author_sort |
Belvin, Robert S. |
title |
Nisgha syntax and the ergativity hypothesis ... |
title_short |
Nisgha syntax and the ergativity hypothesis ... |
title_full |
Nisgha syntax and the ergativity hypothesis ... |
title_fullStr |
Nisgha syntax and the ergativity hypothesis ... |
title_full_unstemmed |
Nisgha syntax and the ergativity hypothesis ... |
title_sort |
nisgha syntax and the ergativity hypothesis ... |
publisher |
University of British Columbia |
publishDate |
2010 |
url |
https://dx.doi.org/10.14288/1.0096319 https://doi.library.ubc.ca/10.14288/1.0096319 |
genre |
Nisgha |
genre_facet |
Nisgha |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.14288/1.0096319 |
_version_ |
1797587430927237120 |