TOMS-derived erythemal irradiance versus measurements at the stations of the Argentine UV Monitoring Network ...
The major factors causing differences between satellite-derived and ground-based ultraviolet (UV) erythemal irradiances and doses are discussed. Measurements totaling more than 4700 days during 1997–1999 were obtained at 8 stations (22°S–64°S) of the Argentine UV Monitoring Network. The satellite re...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
| Language: | unknown |
| Published: |
AGU
2004
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dx.doi.org/10.13016/m2b4s0-9wyy https://mdsoar.org/handle/11603/28602 |
| Summary: | The major factors causing differences between satellite-derived and ground-based ultraviolet (UV) erythemal irradiances and doses are discussed. Measurements totaling more than 4700 days during 1997–1999 were obtained at 8 stations (22°S–64°S) of the Argentine UV Monitoring Network. The satellite retrieval uses radiative transfer calculations for cloud- and aerosol-free conditions multiplied by correction factors for clouds and aerosols. Key parameters are total ozone, cloud optical depth, and surface albedo derived from Total Ozone Mapping Spectrometer (TOMS). When no aerosol correction is applied, systematic differences of satellite-derived erythemal irradiance relative to ground-based measurements amount to +1% at a tropical high-altitude Andean location, +10% at stations in the central Pampas, +5% at southern Patagonian sites, and −7% at the southernmost continental and Antarctic stations with varying snow cover. When an aerosol correction is applied by estimating “minimum” and “maximum” aerosol loading, ... |
|---|