Effective and Efficient Regulation of the Offshore Oil Industry: The 2001 White Rose Public Review Process

Section 44(2)(b) of the provincial and federal Canada-Newfoundland Atlantic Accord Implementation Acts provides for a public review of proposed developments of petroleum resources as part of the existing regulatory approval process for the Newfoundland Offshore Area. To date, public reviews have bee...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: O'Flaherty, Peter, Clarke, Matthew
Format: Text
Language:unknown
Published: Schulich Law Scholars 2003
Subjects:
oil
Gas
Online Access:https://digitalcommons.schulichlaw.dal.ca/dlj/vol26/iss2/3
https://digitalcommons.schulichlaw.dal.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1845&context=dlj
id ftdalhouseunissl:oai:digitalcommons.schulichlaw.dal.ca:dlj-1845
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdalhouseunissl:oai:digitalcommons.schulichlaw.dal.ca:dlj-1845 2023-05-15T17:20:02+02:00 Effective and Efficient Regulation of the Offshore Oil Industry: The 2001 White Rose Public Review Process O'Flaherty, Peter Clarke, Matthew 2003-10-01T07:00:00Z application/pdf https://digitalcommons.schulichlaw.dal.ca/dlj/vol26/iss2/3 https://digitalcommons.schulichlaw.dal.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1845&context=dlj unknown Schulich Law Scholars https://digitalcommons.schulichlaw.dal.ca/dlj/vol26/iss2/3 https://digitalcommons.schulichlaw.dal.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1845&context=dlj Dalhousie Law Journal Canada Newfoundland Atlantic Accord Implementaion Act petroleum resources regulaton offshore Hibernia Terra Nova White Rose public input CNOPB oil Gas and Mineral Law text 2003 ftdalhouseunissl 2023-02-08T06:24:26Z Section 44(2)(b) of the provincial and federal Canada-Newfoundland Atlantic Accord Implementation Acts provides for a public review of proposed developments of petroleum resources as part of the existing regulatory approval process for the Newfoundland Offshore Area. To date, public reviews have been conducted for three offshore oil developments: Hibernia, Terra Nova and White Rose. This paper examines the effectiveness and efficiency of the public review process for the White Rose Project. The author concludes that the review process was effective in successfully gathering public input and reporting this information to the CNOPB. Despite CNOPB's failure to accept many of the report's recommendations, the review process' recommendations regarding provincial benefits were tacitly accepted by the project developer. Finally, the author argues that the process was efficient as it was conducted in a timely manner and at a low cost relative to total pre-production costs. Whether these same benefits would accrue to a smaller offshore project, however remains in doubt. Text Newfoundland Schulich Scholars (Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University) Canada
institution Open Polar
collection Schulich Scholars (Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University)
op_collection_id ftdalhouseunissl
language unknown
topic Canada
Newfoundland
Atlantic Accord Implementaion Act
petroleum
resources
regulaton
offshore
Hibernia
Terra Nova
White Rose
public input
CNOPB
oil
Gas
and Mineral Law
spellingShingle Canada
Newfoundland
Atlantic Accord Implementaion Act
petroleum
resources
regulaton
offshore
Hibernia
Terra Nova
White Rose
public input
CNOPB
oil
Gas
and Mineral Law
O'Flaherty, Peter
Clarke, Matthew
Effective and Efficient Regulation of the Offshore Oil Industry: The 2001 White Rose Public Review Process
topic_facet Canada
Newfoundland
Atlantic Accord Implementaion Act
petroleum
resources
regulaton
offshore
Hibernia
Terra Nova
White Rose
public input
CNOPB
oil
Gas
and Mineral Law
description Section 44(2)(b) of the provincial and federal Canada-Newfoundland Atlantic Accord Implementation Acts provides for a public review of proposed developments of petroleum resources as part of the existing regulatory approval process for the Newfoundland Offshore Area. To date, public reviews have been conducted for three offshore oil developments: Hibernia, Terra Nova and White Rose. This paper examines the effectiveness and efficiency of the public review process for the White Rose Project. The author concludes that the review process was effective in successfully gathering public input and reporting this information to the CNOPB. Despite CNOPB's failure to accept many of the report's recommendations, the review process' recommendations regarding provincial benefits were tacitly accepted by the project developer. Finally, the author argues that the process was efficient as it was conducted in a timely manner and at a low cost relative to total pre-production costs. Whether these same benefits would accrue to a smaller offshore project, however remains in doubt.
format Text
author O'Flaherty, Peter
Clarke, Matthew
author_facet O'Flaherty, Peter
Clarke, Matthew
author_sort O'Flaherty, Peter
title Effective and Efficient Regulation of the Offshore Oil Industry: The 2001 White Rose Public Review Process
title_short Effective and Efficient Regulation of the Offshore Oil Industry: The 2001 White Rose Public Review Process
title_full Effective and Efficient Regulation of the Offshore Oil Industry: The 2001 White Rose Public Review Process
title_fullStr Effective and Efficient Regulation of the Offshore Oil Industry: The 2001 White Rose Public Review Process
title_full_unstemmed Effective and Efficient Regulation of the Offshore Oil Industry: The 2001 White Rose Public Review Process
title_sort effective and efficient regulation of the offshore oil industry: the 2001 white rose public review process
publisher Schulich Law Scholars
publishDate 2003
url https://digitalcommons.schulichlaw.dal.ca/dlj/vol26/iss2/3
https://digitalcommons.schulichlaw.dal.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1845&context=dlj
geographic Canada
geographic_facet Canada
genre Newfoundland
genre_facet Newfoundland
op_source Dalhousie Law Journal
op_relation https://digitalcommons.schulichlaw.dal.ca/dlj/vol26/iss2/3
https://digitalcommons.schulichlaw.dal.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1845&context=dlj
_version_ 1766096979526418432