Abortion Law In Canada: A Matter of National Concern

Canada's newest abortion legislation, embodied in Bill C-43, was defeated in the Senate on January 31st, 1991. The Bill sought to remedy the state of "lawlessness" which has existed respecting abortion ever since the decision reached by the Supreme Court of Canada in R. v. Morgentaler...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: McConnell, Moira, Clark, Lorenne
Format: Text
Language:unknown
Published: Schulich Law Scholars 1991
Subjects:
law
Online Access:https://digitalcommons.schulichlaw.dal.ca/dlj/vol14/iss1/4
https://digitalcommons.schulichlaw.dal.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1618&context=dlj
id ftdalhouseunissl:oai:digitalcommons.schulichlaw.dal.ca:dlj-1618
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdalhouseunissl:oai:digitalcommons.schulichlaw.dal.ca:dlj-1618 2023-05-15T17:22:12+02:00 Abortion Law In Canada: A Matter of National Concern McConnell, Moira Clark, Lorenne 1991-05-01T07:00:00Z application/pdf https://digitalcommons.schulichlaw.dal.ca/dlj/vol14/iss1/4 https://digitalcommons.schulichlaw.dal.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1618&context=dlj unknown Schulich Law Scholars https://digitalcommons.schulichlaw.dal.ca/dlj/vol14/iss1/4 https://digitalcommons.schulichlaw.dal.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1618&context=dlj Dalhousie Law Journal abortion Canada law Supreme Court of Canada Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms women Bill C-43 rights Prince Edward Island Newfoundland reproductive choice Health Law and Policy Law and Gender text 1991 ftdalhouseunissl 2023-02-08T06:24:10Z Canada's newest abortion legislation, embodied in Bill C-43, was defeated in the Senate on January 31st, 1991. The Bill sought to remedy the state of "lawlessness" which has existed respecting abortion ever since the decision reached by the Supreme Court of Canada in R. v. Morgentaler in January, 1988. However, this determination is incorrect. The law is quite clear: there is no criminal prohibition against abortion in Canada. This follows directly from the Court's holding in the Morgentaler decision that the old law, s. 287 (formerly s.251) of the Criminal Code, infringed a woman's right to security and liberty of the person under s.7 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. With the striking down of s.251, Canadian women now have a liberty, or negative right to control their reproductive capacities. What they lack is a claim, or positive right of access to safe, subsidized and efficient abortion facilities. Thus, in our eyes, and in the eyes of two thirds of Canadian women, the only lacuna in the existing law is the absence of law, which in turn creates an obligation on all Provincial governments to provide such facilities to ensure to all women in Canada equal availability to access to abortion services regardless of their Province of residence. Bill C-43 certainly did not fill this gap. But until it is filled, the "right" to abortion conferred as a consequence of the Morgentaler decision is an empty and bitter one to those women living in Prince Edward Island, Newfoundland and in other isolated regions of Canada where no hospitals allow abortions to be performed, or where women must travel great distances to gain access to the available provincial facilities. The defeated Bill C- 43 merely recriminalized the exercise of the right of reproductive choice, thus limiting women's right to reproductive control, and did nothing to cure the real problem. It was therefore retrogressive and insupportable. Text Newfoundland Prince Edward Island Schulich Scholars (Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University) Canada
institution Open Polar
collection Schulich Scholars (Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University)
op_collection_id ftdalhouseunissl
language unknown
topic abortion
Canada
law
Supreme Court of Canada
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
women
Bill C-43
rights
Prince Edward Island
Newfoundland
reproductive choice
Health Law and Policy
Law and Gender
spellingShingle abortion
Canada
law
Supreme Court of Canada
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
women
Bill C-43
rights
Prince Edward Island
Newfoundland
reproductive choice
Health Law and Policy
Law and Gender
McConnell, Moira
Clark, Lorenne
Abortion Law In Canada: A Matter of National Concern
topic_facet abortion
Canada
law
Supreme Court of Canada
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
women
Bill C-43
rights
Prince Edward Island
Newfoundland
reproductive choice
Health Law and Policy
Law and Gender
description Canada's newest abortion legislation, embodied in Bill C-43, was defeated in the Senate on January 31st, 1991. The Bill sought to remedy the state of "lawlessness" which has existed respecting abortion ever since the decision reached by the Supreme Court of Canada in R. v. Morgentaler in January, 1988. However, this determination is incorrect. The law is quite clear: there is no criminal prohibition against abortion in Canada. This follows directly from the Court's holding in the Morgentaler decision that the old law, s. 287 (formerly s.251) of the Criminal Code, infringed a woman's right to security and liberty of the person under s.7 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. With the striking down of s.251, Canadian women now have a liberty, or negative right to control their reproductive capacities. What they lack is a claim, or positive right of access to safe, subsidized and efficient abortion facilities. Thus, in our eyes, and in the eyes of two thirds of Canadian women, the only lacuna in the existing law is the absence of law, which in turn creates an obligation on all Provincial governments to provide such facilities to ensure to all women in Canada equal availability to access to abortion services regardless of their Province of residence. Bill C-43 certainly did not fill this gap. But until it is filled, the "right" to abortion conferred as a consequence of the Morgentaler decision is an empty and bitter one to those women living in Prince Edward Island, Newfoundland and in other isolated regions of Canada where no hospitals allow abortions to be performed, or where women must travel great distances to gain access to the available provincial facilities. The defeated Bill C- 43 merely recriminalized the exercise of the right of reproductive choice, thus limiting women's right to reproductive control, and did nothing to cure the real problem. It was therefore retrogressive and insupportable.
format Text
author McConnell, Moira
Clark, Lorenne
author_facet McConnell, Moira
Clark, Lorenne
author_sort McConnell, Moira
title Abortion Law In Canada: A Matter of National Concern
title_short Abortion Law In Canada: A Matter of National Concern
title_full Abortion Law In Canada: A Matter of National Concern
title_fullStr Abortion Law In Canada: A Matter of National Concern
title_full_unstemmed Abortion Law In Canada: A Matter of National Concern
title_sort abortion law in canada: a matter of national concern
publisher Schulich Law Scholars
publishDate 1991
url https://digitalcommons.schulichlaw.dal.ca/dlj/vol14/iss1/4
https://digitalcommons.schulichlaw.dal.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1618&context=dlj
geographic Canada
geographic_facet Canada
genre Newfoundland
Prince Edward Island
genre_facet Newfoundland
Prince Edward Island
op_source Dalhousie Law Journal
op_relation https://digitalcommons.schulichlaw.dal.ca/dlj/vol14/iss1/4
https://digitalcommons.schulichlaw.dal.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1618&context=dlj
_version_ 1766108651243700224