Upward continuation of Dome-C airborne gravity and comparison with GOCE gradients at orbit altitude in east Antarctica

• Published in: Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica
• Main Authors: Yildiz, Hasan, Forsberg, Rene, Tscherning, Carl Christian, Steinhage, Daniel, Eagles, Graeme, Bouman, Johannes
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: unknown
• Subjects: geofyzika; geodezie; geophysics; geodesy; airborne gravity; upward continuation; GOCE gravity gradients; 7; 550; East Antarctica; Rene; Antarc*; Antarctica
• Online Access: https://kramerius.lib.cas.cz/view/uuid:45c1a750-bd55-4bce-86fb-4a1887e8d491; https://doi.org/10.1007/s11200-015-0634-2

An airborne gravity campaign was carried out at the Dome-C survey area in East Antarctica between the 17th and 22nd of January 2013, in order to provide data for an experiment to validate GOCE satellite gravity gradients. After typical filtering for airborne gravity data, the cross-over error statistics for the few crossing points are 11.3 mGal root mean square (rms) error, corresponding to an rms line error of 8.0 mGal. This number is relatively large due to the rough flight conditions, short lines and field handling procedures used. Comparison of the airborne gravity data with GOCE RL4 spherical harmonic models confirmed the quality of the airborne data and that they contain more high-frequency signal than the global models. First, the airborne gravity data were upward continued to GOCE altitude to predict gravity gradients in the local North-East-Up reference frame. In this step, the least squares collocation using the ITGGRACE2010S field to degree and order 90 as reference field, which is subtracted from both the airborne gravity and GOCE gravity gradients, was applied. Then, the predicted gradients were rotated to the gradiometer reference frame using level 1 attitude quaternion data. The validation with the airborne gravity data was limited to the accurate gradient anomalies (TXX, TYY, TZZ and TXZ) where the long-wavelength information of the GOCE gradients has been replaced with GOCO03s signal to avoid contamination with GOCE gradient errors at these wavelengths. The comparison shows standard deviations between the predicted and GOCE gradient anomalies TXX, TYY, TZZ and TXZ of 9.9, 11.5, 11.6 and 10.4 mE, respectively. A more precise airborne gravity survey of the southern polar gap which is not observed by GOCE would thus provide gradient predictions at a better accuracy, complementing the GOCE coverage in this region. Hasan Yildiz, Rene Forsberg Carl Christian Tscherning, Daniel Steinhage, Graeme Eagles, Johannes Bouman. Seznam literatury