FROM SOCIAL INNOVATION TO INNOVATION SYSTEM: LEADER IN EUROPEAN AND RUSSIAN RURAL AREAS

Данной статье рассматриваются вопросы европейского сельского развития на примере Финляндии и возможности использования европейских подходов к раз-витию села в России. Сельские районы Финляндии претерпели глубокие структурные изменения в течение очень короткого времени. В 1970-е гг. количество фермер...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: INNA KOPOTEVA, JOUKO NIKULA
Format: Text
Language:unknown
Published: Федеральное государственное автономное образовательное учреждение высшего профессионального образования «Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики» 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/from-social-innovation-to-innovation-system-leader-in-european-and-russian-rural-areas
http://cyberleninka.ru/article_covers/15690677.png
id ftcyberleninka:oai:cyberleninka.ru:article/15690677
record_format openpolar
institution Open Polar
collection CyberLeninka (Scientific Electronic Library)
op_collection_id ftcyberleninka
language unknown
topic СЕЛЬСКОЕ ХОЗЯЙСТВО
СЕЛЬСКАЯ ПОЛИТИКА
СЕЛЬСКОЕ РАЗВИТИЕ
ПОДХОД ЛИДЕР
МЕСТНЫЕ ИНИЦИАТИВНЫЕ ГРУППЫ
РОССИЯ
ФИНЛЯНДИЯ
spellingShingle СЕЛЬСКОЕ ХОЗЯЙСТВО
СЕЛЬСКАЯ ПОЛИТИКА
СЕЛЬСКОЕ РАЗВИТИЕ
ПОДХОД ЛИДЕР
МЕСТНЫЕ ИНИЦИАТИВНЫЕ ГРУППЫ
РОССИЯ
ФИНЛЯНДИЯ
INNA KOPOTEVA
JOUKO NIKULA
FROM SOCIAL INNOVATION TO INNOVATION SYSTEM: LEADER IN EUROPEAN AND RUSSIAN RURAL AREAS
topic_facet СЕЛЬСКОЕ ХОЗЯЙСТВО
СЕЛЬСКАЯ ПОЛИТИКА
СЕЛЬСКОЕ РАЗВИТИЕ
ПОДХОД ЛИДЕР
МЕСТНЫЕ ИНИЦИАТИВНЫЕ ГРУППЫ
РОССИЯ
ФИНЛЯНДИЯ
description Данной статье рассматриваются вопросы европейского сельского развития на примере Финляндии и возможности использования европейских подходов к раз-витию села в России. Сельские районы Финляндии претерпели глубокие структурные изменения в течение очень короткого времени. В 1970-е гг. количество фермерских хозяйств резко сократилось и сельское хозяйство перестало быть основным источником доходов в сельских районах. В это же время активно развивается так называе-мое «сельское движение» ( village movement ) и академические исследования села. начале 1980 гг. данные исследования оказали сильное влияние на формирова-ние политики сельского развития государства, важной составляющей которой было тесное сотрудничество между академическим миром и практиками. Одним из элементов выработанной политики оказался так называемый «Блок развития», включающий среди прочего поддержку местных инициатив. Европейский подход ЛИДЕР (LEADER 1) является одним из механизмов, направленных на протекцию этих инициатив. This article discusses the problems of European rural development in the context of Finland and the possibility of using European approaches to rural development in Russia. Rural areas in Finland have undergone profound structural changes within a very short time. In the 1970s, the number of farms dropped dramatically and agriculture was no longer a major source of income in rural areas. At the same time, village movement and academic research villages were actively developing. In the early 1980s, these studies had a strong influence in shaping the rural development policy of the state, an important component of which was the close cooperation between the academic world and practitioners. One of the constituent elements of the defined policy was the so-called “developmental block”, which included, among others, the support of local initiatives. The European LEADER approach is one of the mechanisms to support initiatives. The acronym “LEADER” means “Liaison among Actors in Rural Economic Development”. It is an approach used to mobilize and deliver rural development in local rural communities. In Russia, a pilot LEADER project was carried out thanks to the cross-border cooperation program in the framework of the South-East Finland Russia ENPI CBC 2007-2013 on the territory of the Republic of Karelia and Leningrad Oblast. The overall objective of the project was “the promotion of rural development in selected Russian regions on the basis of knowledge transfer from the Finnish partner” (LEADER approach). The project had many and some rather ambitious goals. The goals were educative, activating and transformative. Educative goals included the knowledge transfer from Finland to Russia through training sessions with local activists and Local Initiative group-coordinators. Activating goals concerned local residents i.e. how to make them more interested in their own affairs and to take part in joint activities. Transformative goals of the project concerned new modes of governance, the bottom-up approach, and the development of partnership relations. On the whole, the Ladoga Initiative project was successful in attaining its main goals, activating local people to cooperate for common interest, and to teach village activists project skills: how to calculate budgets, create time-tables and negotiate with relevant partners. Evidence for this can be seen in the villages in the form of play-grounds, sports facilities (football field, boxing ring) and cultural events which combine handicraft traditions, tourism and entrepreneurship. The Ladoga Initiative was a successful pilot, but any lasting results require more coherent rural policies and that local people are involved in the design and implementation of development policies like the LEADER-approach notes.
format Text
author INNA KOPOTEVA
JOUKO NIKULA
author_facet INNA KOPOTEVA
JOUKO NIKULA
author_sort INNA KOPOTEVA
title FROM SOCIAL INNOVATION TO INNOVATION SYSTEM: LEADER IN EUROPEAN AND RUSSIAN RURAL AREAS
title_short FROM SOCIAL INNOVATION TO INNOVATION SYSTEM: LEADER IN EUROPEAN AND RUSSIAN RURAL AREAS
title_full FROM SOCIAL INNOVATION TO INNOVATION SYSTEM: LEADER IN EUROPEAN AND RUSSIAN RURAL AREAS
title_fullStr FROM SOCIAL INNOVATION TO INNOVATION SYSTEM: LEADER IN EUROPEAN AND RUSSIAN RURAL AREAS
title_full_unstemmed FROM SOCIAL INNOVATION TO INNOVATION SYSTEM: LEADER IN EUROPEAN AND RUSSIAN RURAL AREAS
title_sort from social innovation to innovation system: leader in european and russian rural areas
publisher Федеральное государственное автономное образовательное учреждение высшего профессионального образования «Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики»
publishDate 2014
url http://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/from-social-innovation-to-innovation-system-leader-in-european-and-russian-rural-areas
http://cyberleninka.ru/article_covers/15690677.png
long_lat ENVELOPE(-61.691,-61.691,-64.586,-64.586)
geographic Boxing
geographic_facet Boxing
genre karelia*
karelia*
Republic of Karelia
genre_facet karelia*
karelia*
Republic of Karelia
_version_ 1766052818406342656
spelling ftcyberleninka:oai:cyberleninka.ru:article/15690677 2023-05-15T17:00:11+02:00 FROM SOCIAL INNOVATION TO INNOVATION SYSTEM: LEADER IN EUROPEAN AND RUSSIAN RURAL AREAS INNA KOPOTEVA JOUKO NIKULA 2014 text/html http://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/from-social-innovation-to-innovation-system-leader-in-european-and-russian-rural-areas http://cyberleninka.ru/article_covers/15690677.png unknown Федеральное государственное автономное образовательное учреждение высшего профессионального образования «Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики» СЕЛЬСКОЕ ХОЗЯЙСТВО СЕЛЬСКАЯ ПОЛИТИКА СЕЛЬСКОЕ РАЗВИТИЕ ПОДХОД ЛИДЕР МЕСТНЫЕ ИНИЦИАТИВНЫЕ ГРУППЫ РОССИЯ ФИНЛЯНДИЯ text 2014 ftcyberleninka 2015-12-01T01:36:22Z Данной статье рассматриваются вопросы европейского сельского развития на примере Финляндии и возможности использования европейских подходов к раз-витию села в России. Сельские районы Финляндии претерпели глубокие структурные изменения в течение очень короткого времени. В 1970-е гг. количество фермерских хозяйств резко сократилось и сельское хозяйство перестало быть основным источником доходов в сельских районах. В это же время активно развивается так называе-мое «сельское движение» ( village movement ) и академические исследования села. начале 1980 гг. данные исследования оказали сильное влияние на формирова-ние политики сельского развития государства, важной составляющей которой было тесное сотрудничество между академическим миром и практиками. Одним из элементов выработанной политики оказался так называемый «Блок развития», включающий среди прочего поддержку местных инициатив. Европейский подход ЛИДЕР (LEADER 1) является одним из механизмов, направленных на протекцию этих инициатив. This article discusses the problems of European rural development in the context of Finland and the possibility of using European approaches to rural development in Russia. Rural areas in Finland have undergone profound structural changes within a very short time. In the 1970s, the number of farms dropped dramatically and agriculture was no longer a major source of income in rural areas. At the same time, village movement and academic research villages were actively developing. In the early 1980s, these studies had a strong influence in shaping the rural development policy of the state, an important component of which was the close cooperation between the academic world and practitioners. One of the constituent elements of the defined policy was the so-called “developmental block”, which included, among others, the support of local initiatives. The European LEADER approach is one of the mechanisms to support initiatives. The acronym “LEADER” means “Liaison among Actors in Rural Economic Development”. It is an approach used to mobilize and deliver rural development in local rural communities. In Russia, a pilot LEADER project was carried out thanks to the cross-border cooperation program in the framework of the South-East Finland Russia ENPI CBC 2007-2013 on the territory of the Republic of Karelia and Leningrad Oblast. The overall objective of the project was “the promotion of rural development in selected Russian regions on the basis of knowledge transfer from the Finnish partner” (LEADER approach). The project had many and some rather ambitious goals. The goals were educative, activating and transformative. Educative goals included the knowledge transfer from Finland to Russia through training sessions with local activists and Local Initiative group-coordinators. Activating goals concerned local residents i.e. how to make them more interested in their own affairs and to take part in joint activities. Transformative goals of the project concerned new modes of governance, the bottom-up approach, and the development of partnership relations. On the whole, the Ladoga Initiative project was successful in attaining its main goals, activating local people to cooperate for common interest, and to teach village activists project skills: how to calculate budgets, create time-tables and negotiate with relevant partners. Evidence for this can be seen in the villages in the form of play-grounds, sports facilities (football field, boxing ring) and cultural events which combine handicraft traditions, tourism and entrepreneurship. The Ladoga Initiative was a successful pilot, but any lasting results require more coherent rural policies and that local people are involved in the design and implementation of development policies like the LEADER-approach notes. Text karelia* karelia* Republic of Karelia CyberLeninka (Scientific Electronic Library) Boxing ENVELOPE(-61.691,-61.691,-64.586,-64.586)