Catchability Comparison Between Lofoten and Campelen Gears
9 páginas, 1 figura, 2 tablas.-- Scientific Council Meeting During the EU bottom trawl survey on Flemish Cap in July 1999 - 2001, a comparative trial between the Lofoten survey gear and a Campelen 1800 shrimp trawl was carried out. Results are interpreted based on the main differences between both g...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organization
2002
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10261/83696 |
id |
ftcsic:oai:digital.csic.es:10261/83696 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftcsic:oai:digital.csic.es:10261/83696 2024-02-11T10:04:19+01:00 Catchability Comparison Between Lofoten and Campelen Gears Vázquez, Antonio 2002 http://hdl.handle.net/10261/83696 en eng Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organization N4688 http://archive.nafo.int/open/sc/2002/scr02-074.pdf Scientific Council Research (SCR) Document 02/74 (2002) 0256-6915 http://hdl.handle.net/10261/83696 open Lofoten Campelen Catchability Flemish Cap Cod American plaice Redfish Greenland halibut artículo http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 2002 ftcsic 2024-01-16T09:52:47Z 9 páginas, 1 figura, 2 tablas.-- Scientific Council Meeting During the EU bottom trawl survey on Flemish Cap in July 1999 - 2001, a comparative trial between the Lofoten survey gear and a Campelen 1800 shrimp trawl was carried out. Results are interpreted based on the main differences between both gears: the gear geometry, being the vertical opening of the Campelen gear the highest, the footrope, being the Lofoten the lightest, and the cod - end mesh size, being the Campelen one the smalle This study was supported by the European Commission (DG XIV, Study 00 - 028), CSIC, IEO, IPIMAR and the Basque Government Peer reviewed Article in Journal/Newspaper Greenland Lofoten Digital.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council) Greenland Lofoten |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Digital.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council) |
op_collection_id |
ftcsic |
language |
English |
topic |
Lofoten Campelen Catchability Flemish Cap Cod American plaice Redfish Greenland halibut |
spellingShingle |
Lofoten Campelen Catchability Flemish Cap Cod American plaice Redfish Greenland halibut Vázquez, Antonio Catchability Comparison Between Lofoten and Campelen Gears |
topic_facet |
Lofoten Campelen Catchability Flemish Cap Cod American plaice Redfish Greenland halibut |
description |
9 páginas, 1 figura, 2 tablas.-- Scientific Council Meeting During the EU bottom trawl survey on Flemish Cap in July 1999 - 2001, a comparative trial between the Lofoten survey gear and a Campelen 1800 shrimp trawl was carried out. Results are interpreted based on the main differences between both gears: the gear geometry, being the vertical opening of the Campelen gear the highest, the footrope, being the Lofoten the lightest, and the cod - end mesh size, being the Campelen one the smalle This study was supported by the European Commission (DG XIV, Study 00 - 028), CSIC, IEO, IPIMAR and the Basque Government Peer reviewed |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Vázquez, Antonio |
author_facet |
Vázquez, Antonio |
author_sort |
Vázquez, Antonio |
title |
Catchability Comparison Between Lofoten and Campelen Gears |
title_short |
Catchability Comparison Between Lofoten and Campelen Gears |
title_full |
Catchability Comparison Between Lofoten and Campelen Gears |
title_fullStr |
Catchability Comparison Between Lofoten and Campelen Gears |
title_full_unstemmed |
Catchability Comparison Between Lofoten and Campelen Gears |
title_sort |
catchability comparison between lofoten and campelen gears |
publisher |
Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organization |
publishDate |
2002 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10261/83696 |
geographic |
Greenland Lofoten |
geographic_facet |
Greenland Lofoten |
genre |
Greenland Lofoten |
genre_facet |
Greenland Lofoten |
op_relation |
N4688 http://archive.nafo.int/open/sc/2002/scr02-074.pdf Scientific Council Research (SCR) Document 02/74 (2002) 0256-6915 http://hdl.handle.net/10261/83696 |
op_rights |
open |
_version_ |
1790600896955023360 |