Improved ASCAT Wind Retrieval Using NWP Ocean Calibration

7 pages, 6 figures, 1 table The Advanced Scatterometer (ASCAT) wind data processor (AWDP) currently uses the so called CMOD5n geophysical model function (GMF), which was originally derived for the European Remote Sensing (ERS) scatterometers. In order to deliver a high-quality ASCAT wind product, th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
Main Authors: Verspeek, Jeroen, Stoffelen, Ad, Verhoef, Anton, Portabella, Marcos
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10261/71969
https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2011.2180730
id ftcsic:oai:digital.csic.es:10261/71969
record_format openpolar
spelling ftcsic:oai:digital.csic.es:10261/71969 2023-05-15T18:19:00+02:00 Improved ASCAT Wind Retrieval Using NWP Ocean Calibration Verspeek, Jeroen Stoffelen, Ad Verhoef, Anton Portabella, Marcos 2012-07 http://hdl.handle.net/10261/71969 https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2011.2180730 eng eng Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2011.2180730 IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 50(7): 2488-2494 (2012) 0196-2892 http://hdl.handle.net/10261/71969 doi:10.1109/TGRS.2011.2180730 closedAccess Calibration Radar scattering Scatterometer Wind Backscatter Maximum likelihood estimation Sea measurements Wind speed Artículo 2012 ftcsic https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2011.2180730 2019-01-02T00:19:17Z 7 pages, 6 figures, 1 table The Advanced Scatterometer (ASCAT) wind data processor (AWDP) currently uses the so called CMOD5n geophysical model function (GMF), which was originally derived for the European Remote Sensing (ERS) scatterometers. In order to deliver a high-quality ASCAT wind product, the operational AWDP uses backscatter measurement corrections that are estimated visually (VOC) for each wind vector cell. We propose an alternative and previously established method for estimating correction tables based on numerical weather prediction ocean calibration residuals (NOC). It embodies a smooth incidence-angle dependent part that could serve as an appropriate ASCAT GMF correction, and a radar-beam-dependent residual. The incidence-angle-dependent part of these correction tables is due to differences in calibration procedure of the ERS and ASCAT scatterometers. For the high ASCAT incidence angles for which the GMF has not been assessed by ERS data, the modification is quite large, almost 1 dB. The incidence angle-dependent part is derived by fitting the OC residuals of all beams obtained over one year of data. It is subsequently used to adapt the GMF (yielding CMOD5na). The remaining radar-beam-dependent residual (NOCa) shows a wiggle pattern as function of incidence angle that is very persistent over time, apart from a seasonally varying offset. Both the effects of the GMF modification and the beam-dependent residual on the wind retrieval quality are investigated in this paper. Overall, the performance of NOC is better than that obtained with the previously used VOC calibration method, and the wind statistics show a much better symmetry of the left and right swath for NOC. The beam-dependent corrections improve the quality of the retrieved winds. NOC may thus be used for the intercalibration of the ERS and ASCAT scatterometers The authors wish to thank their colleagues from EUMETSAT and KNMI, Craig Anderson, Hans Bonekamp, Julia Figa and Jur Vogelzang, for their interest in this work, stimulating discussions, provision of data and helpful advice. Footnote: This work is done in the framework of the Ocean and Sea Ice Satellite Application Facility (OSI SAF) and its visiting scientist scheme. The ASCAT winds produced at KNMI can be obtained free of charge from the OSI SAF web site. AWDP has been funded by EUMETSAT in the context of the NWP SAF and can be obtained free of charge from the NWP SAF web site (Helpdesk: scat@knmi.nl) Peer reviewed Article in Journal/Newspaper Sea ice Digital.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council) IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 50 7 2488 2494
institution Open Polar
collection Digital.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council)
op_collection_id ftcsic
language English
topic Calibration
Radar scattering
Scatterometer
Wind
Backscatter
Maximum likelihood estimation
Sea measurements
Wind speed
spellingShingle Calibration
Radar scattering
Scatterometer
Wind
Backscatter
Maximum likelihood estimation
Sea measurements
Wind speed
Verspeek, Jeroen
Stoffelen, Ad
Verhoef, Anton
Portabella, Marcos
Improved ASCAT Wind Retrieval Using NWP Ocean Calibration
topic_facet Calibration
Radar scattering
Scatterometer
Wind
Backscatter
Maximum likelihood estimation
Sea measurements
Wind speed
description 7 pages, 6 figures, 1 table The Advanced Scatterometer (ASCAT) wind data processor (AWDP) currently uses the so called CMOD5n geophysical model function (GMF), which was originally derived for the European Remote Sensing (ERS) scatterometers. In order to deliver a high-quality ASCAT wind product, the operational AWDP uses backscatter measurement corrections that are estimated visually (VOC) for each wind vector cell. We propose an alternative and previously established method for estimating correction tables based on numerical weather prediction ocean calibration residuals (NOC). It embodies a smooth incidence-angle dependent part that could serve as an appropriate ASCAT GMF correction, and a radar-beam-dependent residual. The incidence-angle-dependent part of these correction tables is due to differences in calibration procedure of the ERS and ASCAT scatterometers. For the high ASCAT incidence angles for which the GMF has not been assessed by ERS data, the modification is quite large, almost 1 dB. The incidence angle-dependent part is derived by fitting the OC residuals of all beams obtained over one year of data. It is subsequently used to adapt the GMF (yielding CMOD5na). The remaining radar-beam-dependent residual (NOCa) shows a wiggle pattern as function of incidence angle that is very persistent over time, apart from a seasonally varying offset. Both the effects of the GMF modification and the beam-dependent residual on the wind retrieval quality are investigated in this paper. Overall, the performance of NOC is better than that obtained with the previously used VOC calibration method, and the wind statistics show a much better symmetry of the left and right swath for NOC. The beam-dependent corrections improve the quality of the retrieved winds. NOC may thus be used for the intercalibration of the ERS and ASCAT scatterometers The authors wish to thank their colleagues from EUMETSAT and KNMI, Craig Anderson, Hans Bonekamp, Julia Figa and Jur Vogelzang, for their interest in this work, stimulating discussions, provision of data and helpful advice. Footnote: This work is done in the framework of the Ocean and Sea Ice Satellite Application Facility (OSI SAF) and its visiting scientist scheme. The ASCAT winds produced at KNMI can be obtained free of charge from the OSI SAF web site. AWDP has been funded by EUMETSAT in the context of the NWP SAF and can be obtained free of charge from the NWP SAF web site (Helpdesk: scat@knmi.nl) Peer reviewed
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Verspeek, Jeroen
Stoffelen, Ad
Verhoef, Anton
Portabella, Marcos
author_facet Verspeek, Jeroen
Stoffelen, Ad
Verhoef, Anton
Portabella, Marcos
author_sort Verspeek, Jeroen
title Improved ASCAT Wind Retrieval Using NWP Ocean Calibration
title_short Improved ASCAT Wind Retrieval Using NWP Ocean Calibration
title_full Improved ASCAT Wind Retrieval Using NWP Ocean Calibration
title_fullStr Improved ASCAT Wind Retrieval Using NWP Ocean Calibration
title_full_unstemmed Improved ASCAT Wind Retrieval Using NWP Ocean Calibration
title_sort improved ascat wind retrieval using nwp ocean calibration
publisher Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
publishDate 2012
url http://hdl.handle.net/10261/71969
https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2011.2180730
genre Sea ice
genre_facet Sea ice
op_relation http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2011.2180730
IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 50(7): 2488-2494 (2012)
0196-2892
http://hdl.handle.net/10261/71969
doi:10.1109/TGRS.2011.2180730
op_rights closedAccess
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2011.2180730
container_title IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
container_volume 50
container_issue 7
container_start_page 2488
op_container_end_page 2494
_version_ 1766195821200539648