Do bears know they are being hunted?

Behavioral effects of living under predation risk may influence the dynamics of prey species more than direct demographic effects. Human recreation, especially hunting, can also force prey to increase their vigilance and can influence distribution and habitat use even more than natural predators. Howe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Biological Conservation
Main Authors: Ordiz, Andrés, Stoen, Ole-Gunnar, Saebo, Solbe, Kindberg, Jonnas, Delibes, M., Swenson, Jon E.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10261/54712
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2012.04.006
id ftcsic:oai:digital.csic.es:10261/54712
record_format openpolar
spelling ftcsic:oai:digital.csic.es:10261/54712 2024-02-11T10:09:20+01:00 Do bears know they are being hunted? Ordiz, Andrés Stoen, Ole-Gunnar Saebo, Solbe Kindberg, Jonnas Delibes, M. Swenson, Jon E. 2012 http://hdl.handle.net/10261/54712 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2012.04.006 en eng Elsevier http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2012.04.006 Biological Conservation 152 (2012) 21–28 http://hdl.handle.net/10261/54712 doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2012.04.006 open Conservation Disturbance hunting Large carnivores Management Movement artículo http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 2012 ftcsic https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2012.04.006 2024-01-16T09:40:01Z Behavioral effects of living under predation risk may influence the dynamics of prey species more than direct demographic effects. Human recreation, especially hunting, can also force prey to increase their vigilance and can influence distribution and habitat use even more than natural predators. However, behavioral effects do not play a prominent role in conservation or wildlife management. Whereas the demographic consequences of hunting are documented for large carnivores, behavioral effects of hunting on their dynamics remain unexplored. We studied the movement patterns of brown bears (Ursus arctos) in Scandinavia as a model species, before and after the start of the annual bear hunting season. Bears were expected to become more active at daytime as the season progressed due to shortening daylight. How- ever, the start of hunting disrupted this pattern. Solitary bears subject to hunting increased movements during the dark hours after hunting started, losing their nocturnal rest, probably to compensate for decreased daytime activity. Females with cubs-of-the-year, which are protected from hunting, also mod- ified their movement pattern, but much less than hunted bears. Bears altered their movement pattern at a critical time of the year, during hyperphagia, when they must store fat reserves before hibernation, which is critical for reproduction. Behavioral effects of hunting should be a relevant issue for the conser- vation and management of large carnivores, especially when hunting occurs during highly sensitive peri- ods of the year. This concern applies to many species managed under hunting regimes Peer reviewed Article in Journal/Newspaper Ursus arctos Digital.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council) Biological Conservation 152 21 28
institution Open Polar
collection Digital.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council)
op_collection_id ftcsic
language English
topic Conservation
Disturbance
hunting
Large carnivores
Management
Movement
spellingShingle Conservation
Disturbance
hunting
Large carnivores
Management
Movement
Ordiz, Andrés
Stoen, Ole-Gunnar
Saebo, Solbe
Kindberg, Jonnas
Delibes, M.
Swenson, Jon E.
Do bears know they are being hunted?
topic_facet Conservation
Disturbance
hunting
Large carnivores
Management
Movement
description Behavioral effects of living under predation risk may influence the dynamics of prey species more than direct demographic effects. Human recreation, especially hunting, can also force prey to increase their vigilance and can influence distribution and habitat use even more than natural predators. However, behavioral effects do not play a prominent role in conservation or wildlife management. Whereas the demographic consequences of hunting are documented for large carnivores, behavioral effects of hunting on their dynamics remain unexplored. We studied the movement patterns of brown bears (Ursus arctos) in Scandinavia as a model species, before and after the start of the annual bear hunting season. Bears were expected to become more active at daytime as the season progressed due to shortening daylight. How- ever, the start of hunting disrupted this pattern. Solitary bears subject to hunting increased movements during the dark hours after hunting started, losing their nocturnal rest, probably to compensate for decreased daytime activity. Females with cubs-of-the-year, which are protected from hunting, also mod- ified their movement pattern, but much less than hunted bears. Bears altered their movement pattern at a critical time of the year, during hyperphagia, when they must store fat reserves before hibernation, which is critical for reproduction. Behavioral effects of hunting should be a relevant issue for the conser- vation and management of large carnivores, especially when hunting occurs during highly sensitive peri- ods of the year. This concern applies to many species managed under hunting regimes Peer reviewed
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Ordiz, Andrés
Stoen, Ole-Gunnar
Saebo, Solbe
Kindberg, Jonnas
Delibes, M.
Swenson, Jon E.
author_facet Ordiz, Andrés
Stoen, Ole-Gunnar
Saebo, Solbe
Kindberg, Jonnas
Delibes, M.
Swenson, Jon E.
author_sort Ordiz, Andrés
title Do bears know they are being hunted?
title_short Do bears know they are being hunted?
title_full Do bears know they are being hunted?
title_fullStr Do bears know they are being hunted?
title_full_unstemmed Do bears know they are being hunted?
title_sort do bears know they are being hunted?
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2012
url http://hdl.handle.net/10261/54712
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2012.04.006
genre Ursus arctos
genre_facet Ursus arctos
op_relation http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2012.04.006
Biological Conservation 152 (2012) 21–28
http://hdl.handle.net/10261/54712
doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2012.04.006
op_rights open
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2012.04.006
container_title Biological Conservation
container_volume 152
container_start_page 21
op_container_end_page 28
_version_ 1790609179506900992