Effect of passage through duck gut on germination of fennel pondweed seeds

Vertebrates are important seed dispersers for many plants. In addition to transport of seeds, ingestion often affects the proportion or rate of seed germination. We present one of the first studies comparing the effects of different waterbird species on the seeds of a subcosmopolitan pondweed, Potam...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Archiv für Hydrobiologie
Main Authors: Santamaría, Luis, Charalambidou, Iris, Figuerola, Jordi, Green, Andy J.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Schweizerbart science publishers 2002
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10261/45393
id ftcsic:oai:digital.csic.es:10261/45393
record_format openpolar
spelling ftcsic:oai:digital.csic.es:10261/45393 2024-02-11T10:08:34+01:00 Effect of passage through duck gut on germination of fennel pondweed seeds Santamaría, Luis Charalambidou, Iris Figuerola, Jordi Green, Andy J. 2002-12 http://hdl.handle.net/10261/45393 en eng Schweizerbart science publishers http://dx.doi.org/10.1127/0003-9136/2002/0156-0011 Archiv für Hydrobiologie, 156(1):11-22 (2002). http://hdl.handle.net/10261/45393 .1127/0003-9136/2002/0156-0011 open Potamogeton pectinatus Anas spp Germination endozoochory artículo http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 2002 ftcsic https://doi.org/10.1127/0003-9136/2002/0156-0011 2024-01-16T09:35:56Z Vertebrates are important seed dispersers for many plants. In addition to transport of seeds, ingestion often affects the proportion or rate of seed germination. We present one of the first studies comparing the effects of different waterbird species on the seeds of a subcosmopolitan pondweed, Potamogeton pectinatus. We also present the first comparison of the effects of digestion by ducks (mallard Anas platyrhynchos, shoveler A. clypeata and wigeon A. penelope) and physical-chemical "simulation of digestion" on pondweed seed germination. In two experiments differing in the length of the preceding stratification period, two to three individuals per duck species were force-fed 150 seeds each. Average retrieval, total germination and germination rate did not differ significantly between duck species. Germination rate was higher for duck ingested seeds, intermediate for scarified seeds (i.e. after mechanical removal of the epicarp+mesocarp) and lowest for the controls and acid treated seeds, independently of the length of the stratification period. Total germination, however, did not differ significantly among duck-ingested, scarified, control and acid treated seeds. Consequently the changes in germination rate after ingestion by ducks seem related to the grinding treatment in the gut and unrelated to exposure to acidic conditions. The co-existence of ingested and uningested seeds within a given seed cohort will increase the diversification of seed germination patterns, which can favour the colonisation of habitats characterised by unpredictable environmental conditions Peer reviewed Article in Journal/Newspaper Shoveler Digital.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council) Archiv für Hydrobiologie 156 1 11 22
institution Open Polar
collection Digital.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council)
op_collection_id ftcsic
language English
topic Potamogeton pectinatus
Anas spp
Germination
endozoochory
spellingShingle Potamogeton pectinatus
Anas spp
Germination
endozoochory
Santamaría, Luis
Charalambidou, Iris
Figuerola, Jordi
Green, Andy J.
Effect of passage through duck gut on germination of fennel pondweed seeds
topic_facet Potamogeton pectinatus
Anas spp
Germination
endozoochory
description Vertebrates are important seed dispersers for many plants. In addition to transport of seeds, ingestion often affects the proportion or rate of seed germination. We present one of the first studies comparing the effects of different waterbird species on the seeds of a subcosmopolitan pondweed, Potamogeton pectinatus. We also present the first comparison of the effects of digestion by ducks (mallard Anas platyrhynchos, shoveler A. clypeata and wigeon A. penelope) and physical-chemical "simulation of digestion" on pondweed seed germination. In two experiments differing in the length of the preceding stratification period, two to three individuals per duck species were force-fed 150 seeds each. Average retrieval, total germination and germination rate did not differ significantly between duck species. Germination rate was higher for duck ingested seeds, intermediate for scarified seeds (i.e. after mechanical removal of the epicarp+mesocarp) and lowest for the controls and acid treated seeds, independently of the length of the stratification period. Total germination, however, did not differ significantly among duck-ingested, scarified, control and acid treated seeds. Consequently the changes in germination rate after ingestion by ducks seem related to the grinding treatment in the gut and unrelated to exposure to acidic conditions. The co-existence of ingested and uningested seeds within a given seed cohort will increase the diversification of seed germination patterns, which can favour the colonisation of habitats characterised by unpredictable environmental conditions Peer reviewed
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Santamaría, Luis
Charalambidou, Iris
Figuerola, Jordi
Green, Andy J.
author_facet Santamaría, Luis
Charalambidou, Iris
Figuerola, Jordi
Green, Andy J.
author_sort Santamaría, Luis
title Effect of passage through duck gut on germination of fennel pondweed seeds
title_short Effect of passage through duck gut on germination of fennel pondweed seeds
title_full Effect of passage through duck gut on germination of fennel pondweed seeds
title_fullStr Effect of passage through duck gut on germination of fennel pondweed seeds
title_full_unstemmed Effect of passage through duck gut on germination of fennel pondweed seeds
title_sort effect of passage through duck gut on germination of fennel pondweed seeds
publisher Schweizerbart science publishers
publishDate 2002
url http://hdl.handle.net/10261/45393
genre Shoveler
genre_facet Shoveler
op_relation http://dx.doi.org/10.1127/0003-9136/2002/0156-0011
Archiv für Hydrobiologie, 156(1):11-22 (2002).
http://hdl.handle.net/10261/45393
.1127/0003-9136/2002/0156-0011
op_rights open
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1127/0003-9136/2002/0156-0011
container_title Archiv für Hydrobiologie
container_volume 156
container_issue 1
container_start_page 11
op_container_end_page 22
_version_ 1790607977858727936