How far can the freshwater bryozoan Cristatella mucedo disperse in duck guts?

Statoblasts of Cristatella mucedo were fed to two duck species, pintail (Anas acuta ) and shoveler (A. clypeata ), to assess whether endozoochorous dispersal is responsible for the metapopulation structure of this bryozoan. Eight individuals (four per duck species) were force-fed 500 statoblasts eac...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Archiv für Hydrobiologie
Main Authors: Charalambidou, Iris, Santamaría, Luis, Figuerola, Jordi
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Schweizerbart science publishers 2003
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10261/43302
https://doi.org/10.1127/0003-9136/2003/0157-0547
id ftcsic:oai:digital.csic.es:10261/43302
record_format openpolar
spelling ftcsic:oai:digital.csic.es:10261/43302 2024-02-11T09:55:22+01:00 How far can the freshwater bryozoan Cristatella mucedo disperse in duck guts? Charalambidou, Iris Santamaría, Luis Figuerola, Jordi 2003-07 http://hdl.handle.net/10261/43302 https://doi.org/10.1127/0003-9136/2003/0157-0547 en eng Schweizerbart science publishers http://dx.doi.org/10.1127/0003-9136/2003/0157-0547 Arch. Hydrobiol, 157:547-554 (2003) http://hdl.handle.net/10261/43302 doi:10.1127/0003-9136/2003/0157-0547 open Cristatella mucedo Anas acuta Anas clypeata dispersal endozoochory artículo http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 2003 ftcsic https://doi.org/10.1127/0003-9136/2003/0157-0547 2024-01-16T09:35:01Z Statoblasts of Cristatella mucedo were fed to two duck species, pintail (Anas acuta ) and shoveler (A. clypeata ), to assess whether endozoochorous dispersal is responsible for the metapopulation structure of this bryozoan. Eight individuals (four per duck species) were force-fed 500 statoblasts each. The number of intact sta- toblasts retrieved from the ducks faeces up to 48 hours after ingestion and their reten- tion times, i.e. the time spent in the gut from ingestion to defecation, were recorded. Retrieval of intact statoblasts did not differ significantly between duck species (37 ± 29 % for pintail and 13 ± 21 % for shoveler, average ± SE) and the pattern of retrieval over time was identical. Most statoblasts (79 – 96 % for pintail and 51– 96 % for shove- ler) were recovered during the first four hours after ingestion. Maximum retention times were 44 hours for pintail and 32 hours for shoveler. A few statoblasts retrieved two hours following gut passage germinated, but none in the control group did. We provide evidence that the potential for waterfowl dispersal of C. mucedo statoblasts is higher for short distances up to 300 kilometres, but still possible over longer distances Peer reviewed Article in Journal/Newspaper Anas acuta Anas clypeata Shoveler Digital.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council) Archiv für Hydrobiologie 157 4 547 554
institution Open Polar
collection Digital.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council)
op_collection_id ftcsic
language English
topic Cristatella mucedo
Anas acuta
Anas clypeata
dispersal
endozoochory
spellingShingle Cristatella mucedo
Anas acuta
Anas clypeata
dispersal
endozoochory
Charalambidou, Iris
Santamaría, Luis
Figuerola, Jordi
How far can the freshwater bryozoan Cristatella mucedo disperse in duck guts?
topic_facet Cristatella mucedo
Anas acuta
Anas clypeata
dispersal
endozoochory
description Statoblasts of Cristatella mucedo were fed to two duck species, pintail (Anas acuta ) and shoveler (A. clypeata ), to assess whether endozoochorous dispersal is responsible for the metapopulation structure of this bryozoan. Eight individuals (four per duck species) were force-fed 500 statoblasts each. The number of intact sta- toblasts retrieved from the ducks faeces up to 48 hours after ingestion and their reten- tion times, i.e. the time spent in the gut from ingestion to defecation, were recorded. Retrieval of intact statoblasts did not differ significantly between duck species (37 ± 29 % for pintail and 13 ± 21 % for shoveler, average ± SE) and the pattern of retrieval over time was identical. Most statoblasts (79 – 96 % for pintail and 51– 96 % for shove- ler) were recovered during the first four hours after ingestion. Maximum retention times were 44 hours for pintail and 32 hours for shoveler. A few statoblasts retrieved two hours following gut passage germinated, but none in the control group did. We provide evidence that the potential for waterfowl dispersal of C. mucedo statoblasts is higher for short distances up to 300 kilometres, but still possible over longer distances Peer reviewed
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Charalambidou, Iris
Santamaría, Luis
Figuerola, Jordi
author_facet Charalambidou, Iris
Santamaría, Luis
Figuerola, Jordi
author_sort Charalambidou, Iris
title How far can the freshwater bryozoan Cristatella mucedo disperse in duck guts?
title_short How far can the freshwater bryozoan Cristatella mucedo disperse in duck guts?
title_full How far can the freshwater bryozoan Cristatella mucedo disperse in duck guts?
title_fullStr How far can the freshwater bryozoan Cristatella mucedo disperse in duck guts?
title_full_unstemmed How far can the freshwater bryozoan Cristatella mucedo disperse in duck guts?
title_sort how far can the freshwater bryozoan cristatella mucedo disperse in duck guts?
publisher Schweizerbart science publishers
publishDate 2003
url http://hdl.handle.net/10261/43302
https://doi.org/10.1127/0003-9136/2003/0157-0547
genre Anas acuta
Anas clypeata
Shoveler
genre_facet Anas acuta
Anas clypeata
Shoveler
op_relation http://dx.doi.org/10.1127/0003-9136/2003/0157-0547
Arch. Hydrobiol, 157:547-554 (2003)
http://hdl.handle.net/10261/43302
doi:10.1127/0003-9136/2003/0157-0547
op_rights open
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1127/0003-9136/2003/0157-0547
container_title Archiv für Hydrobiologie
container_volume 157
container_issue 4
container_start_page 547
op_container_end_page 554
_version_ 1790595425112162304