Identification of priority cetacean areas in the north-east Atlantic using systematic conservation planning

9 pages, 3 figures, supporting information https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.4015.-- Data Availability Statement: The cetacean distribution maps used for this study are available via the Dryad Digital Repository 10.5061/dryad.mw6m905sz (Waggitt et al., 2020). Mobile marine protected areas have been propos...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems
Main Authors: Giménez, Joan, Waggitt, James, Jessopp, Mark
Other Authors: Agencia Estatal de Investigación (España)
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: John Wiley & Sons 2023
Subjects:
MPA
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10261/341457
https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.4015
id ftcsic:oai:digital.csic.es:10261/341457
record_format openpolar
spelling ftcsic:oai:digital.csic.es:10261/341457 2024-02-11T10:06:52+01:00 Identification of priority cetacean areas in the north-east Atlantic using systematic conservation planning Giménez, Joan Waggitt, James Jessopp, Mark Agencia Estatal de Investigación (España) 2023-12 http://hdl.handle.net/10261/341457 https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.4015 en eng John Wiley & Sons https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.4015 Sí Aquatic Conservation - Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 33(12): 1571-1579 (2023) 1052-7613 CEX2019-000928-S http://hdl.handle.net/10261/341457 doi:10.1002/aqc.4015 1099-0755 open Cetaceans Marine mammals Mobile marine protected areas MPA Prioritizr Systematic conservation planning Transboundary conservation Conserve and sustainably use the oceans seas and marine resources for sustainable development artículo 2023 ftcsic https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.4015 2024-01-16T11:56:08Z 9 pages, 3 figures, supporting information https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.4015.-- Data Availability Statement: The cetacean distribution maps used for this study are available via the Dryad Digital Repository 10.5061/dryad.mw6m905sz (Waggitt et al., 2020). Mobile marine protected areas have been proposed for the conservation of highly seasonal or mobile marine megafauna. However, seasonal data on the distribution of marine wildlife to inform protected areas are generally scarce worldwide, especially for cetaceans, which makes dynamic solutions difficult to implement. Furthermore, conservation objectives are often set at the level of individual species rather than at the community level, despite many species having similar or overlapping habitat requirements, and a comparison of the effectiveness of mobile vs. static Marine Protected Areas options has rarely been done. Systematic conservation planning was used to identify priority areas of cetacean biodiversity in the north-east Atlantic accounting for seasonal changes in distribution. Consistent hotspots across seasons at a community level, in particular along the shelf edge, suggest that fixed priority areas for cetacean biodiversity may be appropriate. The area required for protection to meet conservation targets (i.e. 20% of a population occurring within a protected area) is minimized when considering populations at basin scale rather than national level. Highly mobile megafauna normally exploit persistent and predictable oceanographic features, so a habitat suitability rather than a jurisdiction-based approach is more appropriate JG was supported by the Department of Agriculture, Fisheries, and the Marine FishKOSM Project and by the Spanish National Program Juan de la Cierva-Formación (FJC2019-040016-I). This work acknowledges the ‘Severo Ochoa Centre of Excellence’ accreditations (Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation; CEX2019-000928-S) Peer reviewed Article in Journal/Newspaper North East Atlantic Digital.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council) Cierva ENVELOPE(-60.873,-60.873,-64.156,-64.156) Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 33 12 1571 1579
institution Open Polar
collection Digital.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council)
op_collection_id ftcsic
language English
topic Cetaceans
Marine mammals
Mobile marine protected areas
MPA
Prioritizr
Systematic conservation planning
Transboundary conservation
Conserve and sustainably use the oceans
seas and marine resources for sustainable development
spellingShingle Cetaceans
Marine mammals
Mobile marine protected areas
MPA
Prioritizr
Systematic conservation planning
Transboundary conservation
Conserve and sustainably use the oceans
seas and marine resources for sustainable development
Giménez, Joan
Waggitt, James
Jessopp, Mark
Identification of priority cetacean areas in the north-east Atlantic using systematic conservation planning
topic_facet Cetaceans
Marine mammals
Mobile marine protected areas
MPA
Prioritizr
Systematic conservation planning
Transboundary conservation
Conserve and sustainably use the oceans
seas and marine resources for sustainable development
description 9 pages, 3 figures, supporting information https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.4015.-- Data Availability Statement: The cetacean distribution maps used for this study are available via the Dryad Digital Repository 10.5061/dryad.mw6m905sz (Waggitt et al., 2020). Mobile marine protected areas have been proposed for the conservation of highly seasonal or mobile marine megafauna. However, seasonal data on the distribution of marine wildlife to inform protected areas are generally scarce worldwide, especially for cetaceans, which makes dynamic solutions difficult to implement. Furthermore, conservation objectives are often set at the level of individual species rather than at the community level, despite many species having similar or overlapping habitat requirements, and a comparison of the effectiveness of mobile vs. static Marine Protected Areas options has rarely been done. Systematic conservation planning was used to identify priority areas of cetacean biodiversity in the north-east Atlantic accounting for seasonal changes in distribution. Consistent hotspots across seasons at a community level, in particular along the shelf edge, suggest that fixed priority areas for cetacean biodiversity may be appropriate. The area required for protection to meet conservation targets (i.e. 20% of a population occurring within a protected area) is minimized when considering populations at basin scale rather than national level. Highly mobile megafauna normally exploit persistent and predictable oceanographic features, so a habitat suitability rather than a jurisdiction-based approach is more appropriate JG was supported by the Department of Agriculture, Fisheries, and the Marine FishKOSM Project and by the Spanish National Program Juan de la Cierva-Formación (FJC2019-040016-I). This work acknowledges the ‘Severo Ochoa Centre of Excellence’ accreditations (Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation; CEX2019-000928-S) Peer reviewed
author2 Agencia Estatal de Investigación (España)
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Giménez, Joan
Waggitt, James
Jessopp, Mark
author_facet Giménez, Joan
Waggitt, James
Jessopp, Mark
author_sort Giménez, Joan
title Identification of priority cetacean areas in the north-east Atlantic using systematic conservation planning
title_short Identification of priority cetacean areas in the north-east Atlantic using systematic conservation planning
title_full Identification of priority cetacean areas in the north-east Atlantic using systematic conservation planning
title_fullStr Identification of priority cetacean areas in the north-east Atlantic using systematic conservation planning
title_full_unstemmed Identification of priority cetacean areas in the north-east Atlantic using systematic conservation planning
title_sort identification of priority cetacean areas in the north-east atlantic using systematic conservation planning
publisher John Wiley & Sons
publishDate 2023
url http://hdl.handle.net/10261/341457
https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.4015
long_lat ENVELOPE(-60.873,-60.873,-64.156,-64.156)
geographic Cierva
geographic_facet Cierva
genre North East Atlantic
genre_facet North East Atlantic
op_relation https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.4015

Aquatic Conservation - Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 33(12): 1571-1579 (2023)
1052-7613
CEX2019-000928-S
http://hdl.handle.net/10261/341457
doi:10.1002/aqc.4015
1099-0755
op_rights open
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.4015
container_title Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems
container_volume 33
container_issue 12
container_start_page 1571
op_container_end_page 1579
_version_ 1790604879865053184