Comparison of different procedures for serotyping aquatic birnavirus

5 pages, 2 figures, 5 tables. The current classification of aquatic birnaviruses is based on seroneutralization assays with polyclonal antibodies. In this study a comparison of several procedures used for serotyping aquatic birnaviruses was made with 10 virus strains (4 reference strains from salmon...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Novoa, Beatriz, Blake, S., Nicholson, B. L., Figueras Huerta, Antonio
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: American Society for Microbiology 1995
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10261/25363
id ftcsic:oai:digital.csic.es:10261/25363
record_format openpolar
spelling ftcsic:oai:digital.csic.es:10261/25363 2024-02-11T10:08:27+01:00 Comparison of different procedures for serotyping aquatic birnavirus Novoa, Beatriz Blake, S. Nicholson, B. L. Figueras Huerta, Antonio 1995-08 391208 bytes application/pdf http://hdl.handle.net/10261/25363 en eng American Society for Microbiology http://aem.asm.org/cgi/content/abstract/61/8/2925 Applied and Environmental Microbiology 61(8): 2925-2929 (1995) 0099-2240 http://hdl.handle.net/10261/25363 none artículo http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 1995 ftcsic 2024-01-16T09:27:18Z 5 pages, 2 figures, 5 tables. The current classification of aquatic birnaviruses is based on seroneutralization assays with polyclonal antibodies. In this study a comparison of several procedures used for serotyping aquatic birnaviruses was made with 10 virus strains (4 reference strains from salmonids and 6 birnaviruses isolated from turbot [Scophthalmus maximus]). The relationships among the birnavirus strains were studied by seroneutralization assay with polyclonal antibodies and by immunodot assay with both polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies. The results were compared with a presumptive classification obtained from analysis of restriction enzyme patterns of cDNA products obtained by PCR amplification. No correlation was found among the results obtained by the different procedures. The seroneutralization and the immunodot assays with polyclonal antibodies were not useful in classifying these birnaviruses strains; however, patterns of reaction with monoclonal antibodies emphasized the individuality of the strains, particularly in the case of two strains (231 and 460) whose patterns did not correspond to established serotypes. The application of PCR and restriction enzyme analysis is a promising system for approaching the classification of this viral group on the basis of genomic differences and similarities. The variable results obtained in this comparison lead us to think that the current classification of aquatic birnavirus may not be the most accurate and there is a need for modification incorporating recent isolates, not only from salmonid species but also from marine fish. This work was supported by grant AGF93-0769-C02-02 from the Comisión Interministerial de Ciencia y Tecnología. Beatriz Novoa acknowledges the Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia (Spain) for a research fellowship. Peer reviewed Article in Journal/Newspaper Scophthalmus maximus Turbot Digital.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council)
institution Open Polar
collection Digital.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council)
op_collection_id ftcsic
language English
description 5 pages, 2 figures, 5 tables. The current classification of aquatic birnaviruses is based on seroneutralization assays with polyclonal antibodies. In this study a comparison of several procedures used for serotyping aquatic birnaviruses was made with 10 virus strains (4 reference strains from salmonids and 6 birnaviruses isolated from turbot [Scophthalmus maximus]). The relationships among the birnavirus strains were studied by seroneutralization assay with polyclonal antibodies and by immunodot assay with both polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies. The results were compared with a presumptive classification obtained from analysis of restriction enzyme patterns of cDNA products obtained by PCR amplification. No correlation was found among the results obtained by the different procedures. The seroneutralization and the immunodot assays with polyclonal antibodies were not useful in classifying these birnaviruses strains; however, patterns of reaction with monoclonal antibodies emphasized the individuality of the strains, particularly in the case of two strains (231 and 460) whose patterns did not correspond to established serotypes. The application of PCR and restriction enzyme analysis is a promising system for approaching the classification of this viral group on the basis of genomic differences and similarities. The variable results obtained in this comparison lead us to think that the current classification of aquatic birnavirus may not be the most accurate and there is a need for modification incorporating recent isolates, not only from salmonid species but also from marine fish. This work was supported by grant AGF93-0769-C02-02 from the Comisión Interministerial de Ciencia y Tecnología. Beatriz Novoa acknowledges the Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia (Spain) for a research fellowship. Peer reviewed
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Novoa, Beatriz
Blake, S.
Nicholson, B. L.
Figueras Huerta, Antonio
spellingShingle Novoa, Beatriz
Blake, S.
Nicholson, B. L.
Figueras Huerta, Antonio
Comparison of different procedures for serotyping aquatic birnavirus
author_facet Novoa, Beatriz
Blake, S.
Nicholson, B. L.
Figueras Huerta, Antonio
author_sort Novoa, Beatriz
title Comparison of different procedures for serotyping aquatic birnavirus
title_short Comparison of different procedures for serotyping aquatic birnavirus
title_full Comparison of different procedures for serotyping aquatic birnavirus
title_fullStr Comparison of different procedures for serotyping aquatic birnavirus
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of different procedures for serotyping aquatic birnavirus
title_sort comparison of different procedures for serotyping aquatic birnavirus
publisher American Society for Microbiology
publishDate 1995
url http://hdl.handle.net/10261/25363
genre Scophthalmus maximus
Turbot
genre_facet Scophthalmus maximus
Turbot
op_relation http://aem.asm.org/cgi/content/abstract/61/8/2925
Applied and Environmental Microbiology 61(8): 2925-2929 (1995)
0099-2240
http://hdl.handle.net/10261/25363
op_rights none
_version_ 1790607795210420224