Wolf Media Coverage in the Region of Castilla y León (Spain): Variations over Time and in Two Contrasting Socio-Ecological Settings

© 2020 by the author. People’s attitudes towards large carnivores, and thus public support for their conservation, can be influenced by how these species are framed in the media. Therefore, assessing media coverage of large carnivores is of particular interest for their coexistence with humans. I us...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Animals
Main Author: Delibes-Mateos, Miguel
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10261/209431
https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10040736
id ftcsic:oai:digital.csic.es:10261/209431
record_format openpolar
spelling ftcsic:oai:digital.csic.es:10261/209431 2024-02-11T10:02:46+01:00 Wolf Media Coverage in the Region of Castilla y León (Spain): Variations over Time and in Two Contrasting Socio-Ecological Settings Delibes-Mateos, Miguel 2020 http://hdl.handle.net/10261/209431 https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10040736 en eng Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute Publisher’s version https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10040736 Sí Animals 10(4): 736 (2020) 2076-2615 http://hdl.handle.net/10261/209431 doi:10.3390/ani10040736 32340236 open Canis lupus Content analysis Human-wildlife conflicts Livestock loss Wolf attacks artículo http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 2020 ftcsic https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10040736 2024-01-16T10:52:54Z © 2020 by the author. People’s attitudes towards large carnivores, and thus public support for their conservation, can be influenced by how these species are framed in the media. Therefore, assessing media coverage of large carnivores is of particular interest for their coexistence with humans. I used content analysis to assess how the grey wolf was portrayed in a newspaper in northern Spain, how wolf media coverage varied over time (2006–2017), and in two different socio-ecological settings. Most documents addressed the conflictive relationship between the wolf and livestock (60%; n = 902). Moreover, coverage of this relationship increased over the study period in the south of the study area, where the wolf is strictly protected, has recolonised new localities, and damage to livestock has increased. Overall, other topics, such as wolf conservation or hunting, appeared much less frequently in the media, but predominated in the north of the study area, where the wolf is more abundant and huntable. Conflictive issues like wolf-livestock interactions are generally attractive for audiences, but drawing attention to this issue may compromise the management of conflicts associated with wolves. Ideally, the media should promote potential wolf conservation values if coexistence between wolves and humans is sought Peer reviewed Article in Journal/Newspaper Canis lupus Digital.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council) Animals 10 4 736
institution Open Polar
collection Digital.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council)
op_collection_id ftcsic
language English
topic Canis lupus
Content analysis
Human-wildlife conflicts
Livestock loss
Wolf attacks
spellingShingle Canis lupus
Content analysis
Human-wildlife conflicts
Livestock loss
Wolf attacks
Delibes-Mateos, Miguel
Wolf Media Coverage in the Region of Castilla y León (Spain): Variations over Time and in Two Contrasting Socio-Ecological Settings
topic_facet Canis lupus
Content analysis
Human-wildlife conflicts
Livestock loss
Wolf attacks
description © 2020 by the author. People’s attitudes towards large carnivores, and thus public support for their conservation, can be influenced by how these species are framed in the media. Therefore, assessing media coverage of large carnivores is of particular interest for their coexistence with humans. I used content analysis to assess how the grey wolf was portrayed in a newspaper in northern Spain, how wolf media coverage varied over time (2006–2017), and in two different socio-ecological settings. Most documents addressed the conflictive relationship between the wolf and livestock (60%; n = 902). Moreover, coverage of this relationship increased over the study period in the south of the study area, where the wolf is strictly protected, has recolonised new localities, and damage to livestock has increased. Overall, other topics, such as wolf conservation or hunting, appeared much less frequently in the media, but predominated in the north of the study area, where the wolf is more abundant and huntable. Conflictive issues like wolf-livestock interactions are generally attractive for audiences, but drawing attention to this issue may compromise the management of conflicts associated with wolves. Ideally, the media should promote potential wolf conservation values if coexistence between wolves and humans is sought Peer reviewed
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Delibes-Mateos, Miguel
author_facet Delibes-Mateos, Miguel
author_sort Delibes-Mateos, Miguel
title Wolf Media Coverage in the Region of Castilla y León (Spain): Variations over Time and in Two Contrasting Socio-Ecological Settings
title_short Wolf Media Coverage in the Region of Castilla y León (Spain): Variations over Time and in Two Contrasting Socio-Ecological Settings
title_full Wolf Media Coverage in the Region of Castilla y León (Spain): Variations over Time and in Two Contrasting Socio-Ecological Settings
title_fullStr Wolf Media Coverage in the Region of Castilla y León (Spain): Variations over Time and in Two Contrasting Socio-Ecological Settings
title_full_unstemmed Wolf Media Coverage in the Region of Castilla y León (Spain): Variations over Time and in Two Contrasting Socio-Ecological Settings
title_sort wolf media coverage in the region of castilla y león (spain): variations over time and in two contrasting socio-ecological settings
publisher Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
publishDate 2020
url http://hdl.handle.net/10261/209431
https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10040736
genre Canis lupus
genre_facet Canis lupus
op_relation Publisher’s version
https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10040736

Animals 10(4): 736 (2020)
2076-2615
http://hdl.handle.net/10261/209431
doi:10.3390/ani10040736
32340236
op_rights open
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10040736
container_title Animals
container_volume 10
container_issue 4
container_start_page 736
_version_ 1790598827305074688